Advertisement

The Use of Standards for Identifying, Codifying and Transmitting Expert Ergonomic Knowledge

  • Gill Whitney
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 824)

Abstract

Formal technical standards based on ergonomic principles can ensure that products, systems and services are fit for purpose, accessible and useable. The application of these standards should be used to ensure that items of technology meet political requirements for equality by enabling the full range of end users to participate in the digital society. Ergonomists and representatives of consumers participate in the specification and creation of these standards to ensure that their content is relevant, correct and up-to-date. They work to ensure that the standards accurately represent the needs and requirements of end users including amongst others people with disabilities, older people and people with different language and cultural backgrounds. A number of these standards are referenced in law and in procurement contracts. They are not often not used in higher education resulting in knowledge deficit for young technical professionals. The paper is based on the authors experience including working in the area of accessibility standardization and at a University which prides itself on the diversity of its staff and has students from more than 150 nations. The paper ends with a consideration of the way in which more effective use can be made of these standards.

Keywords

Standard Knowledge transfer Accessibility 

References

  1. 1.
    Lazar J, Abascal J, Barbosa S, Barksdale J, Friedman B, Grossklags J, Gulliksen J, Johnson J, McEwan T, Martínez-Normand L, Michalk W, Tsai J, van der Veer G, Axelson H, Walldius A, Whitney G, Winckler M, Wulf V, Churchill E, Cranor L, Davis J, Hedge A, Hochheiser H, Hourcade J, Lewis C, Nathan L, Paterno F, Reid B, Quesenbery W, Selker T, Wentz B (2016) Human-computer interaction and international public policymaking: a framework for understanding and taking future actions. Found Trends® Hum Comput Interact 9(2):69–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Velleman E, Nahuis I, van der Geest T (2015) Factors explaining adoption and implementation processes for web accessibility standards within eGovernment systems and organizations. Univ Access Inf Soc 16(1):173–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fox R, Sommerich C, Green P, Albin T, Poston A, Gardner-Bonneau D, Parsons K (2015) Human factors and ergonomics standards. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, vol 59, no 1, pp 440–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Growth, European Standards (2018) STANDARDISATION - Mandate 554. http://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/mandates/index.cfm?fuseaction=search.detail&id=577. Accessed 13 Apr 2018
  5. 5.
    BSI (2018) How are standards made? | BSI Group. https://www.bsigroup.com/en-GB/standards/Information-about-standards/how-are-standards-made/. Accessed 26 Feb 2018
  6. 6.
    BSI (2018) Different types of standards | BSI Group. https://www.bsigroup.com/en-GB/standards/Information-about-standards/different-types-of-standards/. Accessed 12 Apr 2018
  7. 7.
    Hall-Andersen LB, Broberg O, Christoffersen LD (2013) Integrating ergonomic knowledge into engineering design processes. Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens LyngbyGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    ISO (2018) Stages and resources for standards development. https://www.iso.org/stages-and-resources-for-standards-development.html. Accessed 12 Apr 2018
  9. 9.
    Yesilada Y, Brajnik G, Vigo M, Harper S (2013) Exploring perceptions of web accessibility: a survey approach. Behav Inf Technol 34(2):119–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Viardot E, Sherif M, Chen J (2016) Managing innovation with standardization: an introduction to recent trends and new challenges. Technovation 48–49:1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Großmann A, Filipović E, Lazina L (2015) The strategic use of patents and standards for new product development knowledge transfer. R&D Manag 46(2):312–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    ISO (2018) ISO and IEC international standards for policy makers. https://www.iso.org/files/live/sites/isoorg/files/archive/pdf/en/pub100359.pdf. Accessed 12 Apr 2018
  13. 13.
    REF 2021 (2018) Research excellence framework. http://www.ref.ac.uk/. Accessed 13 Apr 2018
  14. 14.
    McDermott R (2000) Chapter 2 - Why information technology inspired but cannot deliver knowledge management. In: Knowledge and communities. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, pp 21–35. ISBN 9780750672931.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-7293-1.50005-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    User co-production in standardisation (2018) 1st edn. [ebook] Delf: NEN, p 4. https://www.nen.nl/Normontwikkeling/Progressive.htm. Accessed 13 Apr 2018
  16. 16.
    European Commission, Growth (2018) Joint initiative on standardisation: responding to a changing marketplace - growth - European commission. http://ec.europa.eu/growth/content/joint-initiative-standardisation-responding-changing-marketplace-0_en. Accessed 26 Mar 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Middlesex UniversityLondonUK

Personalised recommendations