Advertisement

Design for the Lower Limbs. A Study for the Development of an Assistive Robotic System for Sensorimotor Rehabilitation After Stroke

  • Francesca Toso
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 824)

Abstract

Stroke is the first cause of disability and the second of death in Europe.

Given the wideness of the target of patients affected by it and the impossibility to reduce them in a sample, the study focused on the need of therapists to start the rehabilitation with bedridden patients that for different reasons cannot stand but have a good cognitive response: the lack of assistive devices for the rehabilitation for lying patients and the time needed for their discharge from a stroke unit to another ward are times of inactivity that can lead to a less effective recovery. The paper is the synthesis of a doctoral research in Design Sciences: based on the concept of neural plasticity and the possibility of complete recovery after stroke, a project concept has been built on technologically-driven dynamics of distraction, involving the patients in a flow heading to an optimal experience state, fostering the engagement through the gamification of the exercises and giving to the therapist the possibility to control and customize the levels of complexity of the stimulation. After an interdisciplinary desktop research, an on-field observation has been conducted to identify possible areas of intervention: attention has been given to the environment of use, the therapists as main users, the patients as secondary users and beneficiary of the interaction, the design and the usability of the system. The result is a design concept of an assistive robotic system for sensorimotor rehabilitation of lower limbs enhanced by a digital gaming and progress monitoring system.

Keywords

Medical design Assistive robotic devices Stroke rehabilitation 

References

  1. Abt CC (1987) Serious games. University Press of AmericaGoogle Scholar
  2. Belda-Lois JM, Mena-del Horno S, Bermejo-Bosch I, Moreno JC, Pons JL, Farina D, Iosa M, Molinari M, Tamburella F, Ramos A, Caria A (2011) Rehabilitation of gait aft er stroke: a review towards a top-down approach. J NeuroEng Rehab 8:66.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-8-66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blessing LTM, Chakrabarti A (2009) DRM, a design research methodology. Springer Science & Business Media, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Calabrese JD (2013). Ethnographic approaches to health experiences research.pdf. In: Understanding and using health experiences: improving patient care, vol. 2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Calleja G (2011) In-game: from immersion to incorporation. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Carvalho D, Teixeira S, Lucas M, Yuan TF, Chaves F, Peressutti C, Machado S, Bittencourt J, Menéndez-González M, Nardi AE, Velasques B, Cagy M, Piedade R, Ribeiro P, Arias-Carrión O (2013). The mirror neuron system in post-stroke rehabilitation. Int Arch Med. http://www.intarchmed.com/content/6/1/41
  7. Csikszentmihalyi M (2009) Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. Harper CollinsGoogle Scholar
  8. ESO (2017) In Brussels, ESO urges Europe to end the “stroke care lottery.” https://eso-stroke.org/kategorie-1/brussels-eso-urges-europe-end-stroke-care-lottery/. Accessed 24 Oct 2017
  9. Gallese V (2005) Embodied simulation: from neurons to phenomenal experience. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 4(1):23–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gazzaley A, Rosen LD (2016) The distracted mind: ancient brains in a high-tech world. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Mival O, Benyon D (2015) User Experience (UX) design for medical personnel and patients. In: Requirements engineering for digital health. Springer, Cham, pp 117–131.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09798-5_6Google Scholar
  12. Perfetti C (1986) Movimento, azione, recupero. Liviana Scolastica, PadovaGoogle Scholar
  13. Perfetti C (1979) La rieducazione motoria dell’emiplegico. GhedimediaGoogle Scholar
  14. Perfetti C (1992). Esercizi per una memoria riabilitativa. Idelson LivianaGoogle Scholar
  15. Perfetti C, Pieroni A (1992) La logica dell’esercizio. Idelson LivianaGoogle Scholar
  16. Rizzolatti G, Sinigaglia C (2006) So quel che fai: il cervello che agisce e i neuroni specchio. Cortina RaffaelloGoogle Scholar
  17. Sanders M (1993) Human factors in engineering and design. McGraw-Hill Education, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Stevenson F (2013) Observing interactions as an approach to understanding patients’ experiences. In: Understanding and using health experiences: improving patient care, vol. 2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tilley AR (1994) Le misure dell’uomo e della donna: dati di riferimento per il progetto. BE-MAGoogle Scholar
  20. Toso F (2017) Sense and movement. Design of a system for sensorimotor rehabilitation after stroke. Des J 20(sup1):S2463–S2472.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352761CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Università Iuav di VeneziaVeneziaItaly

Personalised recommendations