Underground Workspaces: A Human Factors Approach
With increasing population density in urban areas, underground space use in these urban centres is also on the rise. This can be in the form of more traditional underground (UG) facilities, such as water treatment plants and subway stations, but also more diversified uses such as underground offices and data centres. As these relatively novel underground workspaces are constructed, we need to take a human centric approach to ensure that the workers are happy and healthy. When designing any space, it is important to consider the relationships between the environmental, architectural characteristics and behavior and wellbeing. This is crucial in underground developments, as the initial cost of developing an underground space is significantly higher (at least in the short term) than aboveground and would have to be offset by a longer building life. Previous studies show negative attitudes towards working underground and hint at possible psychological and health complaints. Major themes include lighting and circadian rhythms, metabolic changes and claustrophobia. However, these studies are over thirty years old and mainly concentrate on self-report measures. To respond to this challenge, we have systematically examined the relationship between underground spaces and human performance in a 4 year research program. Using mixed methods such as psychophysiological measurements, cognitive tests and interviews, we examine the architectural and engineering choices that could impact or mitigate specific issues related to underground work environment.
KeywordsUnderground Workspace Human factors Cognition Social Health Architecture Psychology
This material is based on research/work supported by the Land and Liveability National Innovation Challenge (L2 NIC) Award No. L2NICCFP1-2013-2 (PI: Chee-Kiong Soh). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the L2 NIC.
- 1.United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2017) World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision, custom data acquired via website. https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/DataQuery/. Accessed 24 April 2018
- 2.World Economic Forum: These are the world’s most crowded cities webpage. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/05/these-are-the-world-s-most-crowded-cities/. Accessed 5 Aug 2018
- 3.World Economic Forum: Which are the world’s most crowded cities? https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/11/which-are-the-worlds-most-crowded-cities. Accessed 5 Aug 2018
- 4.United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division The World’s Cities in 2016 – Data Booklet (ST/ESA/ SER.A/392) (2016)Google Scholar
- 5.United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Natural Sciences, Science and Technology, Sustainable Engineering. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/science-technology/engineering/sustainable-engineering/. Accessed 24 April 2018
- 11.Posadzki PP, Bajpai R, Kyaw BM, Roberts NJ, Brzezinski A, Christopoulos GI, Divakar U, Bajpai S, Soljak M, Jarbrink K, Nang EEK, Soh CK, Car J (2018) Melatonin and health: an umbrella review of health outcomes and biological mechanisms of action. BMC Med 16(1):18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-1000-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Lee EH, Christopoulos GI, Kwok KW, Roberts AC, Soh CK (2017) A psychosocial approach to understanding underground spaces. Frontiers Psychol 8, 452. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00452
- 14.Hane T, Muro K, Sawada H (1991) Psychological factors involved in establishing comfortable underground environments. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on underground space and earth sheltered buildings: urban underground utilization 1991. Urban Underground Space Center of Japan, Tokyo, Japan, pp 480–492Google Scholar
- 18.Carmody J, Sterling RL (1990) Underground space on earth: analog for a lunar base. Engineering, Construction, and Operations in Space II. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, pp 551–560Google Scholar
- 19.Godard JP (2004) Urban underground space and benefits of going underground. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 19(4–5):372Google Scholar
- 26.Mohirta A (2012) Natural lighting and psychological barriers in underground space, Ph.D. thesis. Brookes University, Oxford, EnglandGoogle Scholar
- 32.Collins BL (1975) Windows and people: a literature survey. Psychological reaction to environments with and without windows (No. NBS-BSS-70). National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC (USA); US Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, Institute for Applied Technology, WashingtonGoogle Scholar