Advertisement

An Ergonomic Program in a Chemical Plant of Rhodia/Solvay in Brazil

  • Valmir Azevedo
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 825)

Abstract

Since 2002, an ergonomic program, assumed by the management of the industrial site, including the participation of employees, being done comes to identify, analyze, solve and control ergonomic risk factors at work. The steps of the ergonomic process are: 1. training of the employees in ergonomics (main concepts, risk factors identification, simplified and some advanced methods of ergonomic analysis, record activities/tasks; discussion and choice of solutions, action plan, implementation of solution, follow-up); 2. formation of the working group by plant; 3. identification of activities with potential risk to cause damage to health; 4. ergonomic analysis of activities/tasks at workplace and photo/filming of them; 5. discution of collected data, seeing photos/films and classification of risk degree, in group; 6. discussion and choice of solutions in group; 7. elaboration of technical report; 8. fill indicator «ergostatus» ; 9. elaboration of action plan by the team of the plant; 10. implementation of solution; 11. follow-up after implementation of solution; 12. update the indicator. The main achievements were: office furniture adequacy; labs furniture and practices adequacy; elimination of manual lifting to loads >20 kg; mounting of several mechanical lifting load devices; installation of force reduction devices in valves; automation of processes (ex.: filling and charging barrels at logistic; silica amorphous packing); improvement of management of equipments (forklifts in logistic); the initiative of each area or plant to identify and eliminate ergonomic risk factors (nowadays each area or plant has an employee in charge of ergonomics issues).

Keywords

Ergonomics Chemical Plant Worker’s participation 

References

  1. 1.
    Taylor FW (1995) Princípios da Administração Científica. Atlas, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Guerin F (2008) Compreender o trabalho para transformá-lo. Edgar Blucher, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Daniellou FA (2004) Ergonomia em Busca de Seus Princípios. Edgar Bluccher, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wisner A (2003) A Inteligência no Trabalho. Fundacentro, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    NR 17 (1990) Ministério do Trabalho, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Couto HA (1995) Ergonomia Aplicada ao Trabalho, vol I. Ergo Editora, Belo HorizonteGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Couto HA (1996) Ergonomia Aplicada ao Trabalho, vol II. Ergo Editora, Belo HorizonteGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Couto HA (2000) Novas Perspectivas na Abordagem Preventiva das LER/DORT. Ergo, Belo HorizonteGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chaffin AM (2001) Biomecânica ocupacional. Ergo Editora, Belo HorizonteGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wilson JR (2000) Fundamentals of ergonomics in theory and practice. Appl Ergonomics 31:557–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moore JS, Garg A (1995) The Strain Index: a proposed method to analyze jobs for risk of distal upper extremity disorders. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 56:443–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Colombini D, Occhipinti E (1996) Proposta di un indice sintetico per la valutazione dell`esposizione a movimenti repetitive degli arti superiori (OCRA Index). Medicina del Lavoro. Med Lav 87(6):526–548Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Waters TR, Putz-Anderson V, Garg A, Fine LJ (1993) Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. Ergonomics 36(7):749–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Waters TR, Lu ML, Piacitelli A, Werren D, Deddens JA (2011) Efficacy of the revised NIOSH lifting equation to predict risk of low back pain due manual lifting: expanded cross-sectional analysis. J Occup Environ Med 53(9):1061–1067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Blehm C, Vishnu S, Khattak A, Mitra S, Yee RW (2005) Computer vision syndrome: a rewiew. Surv Ophthalmol 50(3):253–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reason J (2000) Human error: models and management. BMJ 320(7237):768–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rhodia SolvayPaulíniaBrazil
  2. 2.Unicamp UniversityCampinasBrazil

Personalised recommendations