Advertisement

Risk Factors Associated with Work-Related Fatigue Among Indonesian Mining Workers

  • Baiduri Widanarko
  • Robiana Modjo
  • Julia Rantetampang
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 825)

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the association between risk factors for work-related fatigue (WRF) among Indonesian mining workers. This preliminary study was conducted among 201 surface mining workers as part of a larger study in a mineral mining industry in Indonesia. A validated self-reported questionnaire was used to obtain information on individual characteristics (i.e. age, smoking and exercise habits, duration of work, shift work, and job position), physical (i.e. duration of working in sitting posture, squatting posture, trunk flexion posture, hand above shoulder, using vibrating hand tool, exposed to whole body vibration, and lifting), and psychosocial (i.e. effort, reward, over commitment, supervisor support, co-worker support, job satisfaction, and work stress) factors. Two sets of validated questionnaires were used to assess acute and chronic WRF as the outcomes. A multivariate linear regression model was developed for each outcome. This study found that being mining operators and processing plant operators, doing activities that involved hands above shoulders, using vibrating hand tools, and reporting high effort score increased acute WRF score. In contrast, former smokers and high supervisor support decreased the score of acute WRF. Being mining operators, warehouse crews and processing plant operators, reporting high effort score, high over commitment score and their job to be mildly/moderately to very/extremely stressful increase chronic WRF score. In conclusion, job position and both physical and psychosocial factors increased the acute WRF score, whereas for chronic WRF, only job position and psychosocial factor increased chronic WRF score.

Keywords

Fatigue Stress Developing country 

References

  1. 1.
    Mine Safety and Health Administration (2016) Mine Injury and Worktime, Quarterly. https://arlweb.msha.gov/Stats/Part50/WQ/2016/MIWQ%20Final%202016.pdf
  2. 2.
    Department of Mines Industry Regulation and Safety (2018) Safety performance in the Western Australian mineral industry — accident and injury statistics 2016–2017. http://www.dmp.wa.gov.au/Documents/Safety/MSH_Stats_Reports_SafetyPerfWA_2016-17.pdf
  3. 3.
    Direktorat Jenderal Mineral dan Batubara Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral. Data Berkala Minerba, Jakarta (September 2017). https://www.minerba.esdm.go.id/library/content/file/28935-Minerba%20dalam%20angka/bc062368041a21f457bebbcb97dcc8f92017-11-14-17-58-42.pdf
  4. 4.
    Fletcher A (2010) Staying safe in the jungles of Borneo: five studies of fatigue and cultural issues in remote mining projects. Ind Health 48(4):406–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Swaen G, Van Amelsvoort L, Bültmann U, Kant I (2003) Fatigue as a risk factor for being injured in an occupational accident: results from the Maastricht Cohort Study. Occup Environ Med 60(1):i88–i92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fischer D, Lombardi DA, Folkard S, Willetts J, Christiani DC (2017) Updating the “Risk Index”: a systematic review and meta-analysis of occupational injuries and work schedule characteristics. Chronobiol Int 34:1423–1438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Civil Aviation Safety Authority (2006) Fatigue Risk Management System (FRMS) Integration: a practical guide for small and medium-sized operations who want to run their FRMS within a safety management system (SMS)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kant I, Bültmann U, Schröer KAP, Beurskens AJHM, van Amelsvoort LGPM, van Swaen GMH (2003) An epidemiological approach to study fatigue in the working population: the Maastricht Cohort Study. Occup Environ Med 60(1):i32–i39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Winwood PC, Winefield AH, Dawson D, Lushington K (2005) Development and validation of a scale to measure work-related fatigue and recovery: the occupational fatigue exhaustion/recovery scale (OFER). J Occup Environ Med 47(6):594–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leijon O, Wiktorin C, Harenstam A, Karlqvist L (2002) MOA research group. validity of a self-administered questionnaire for assessing physical work loads in a general population. J Occup Environ Med 44(8):724–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wiktorin C, Hjelm EW, Winkel J, Koster M (1996) Reproducibility of a questionnaire for assessment of physical load during work and leisure time. J Occup Environ Med 38(2):190–201 PubMed PMID: ISI:A1996TY10800014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Viikari Juntura E, Rauas S, Martikainen R et al (1996) Validity of self-reported physical work load in epidemiologic studies on musculoskeletal disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health 22(4):251–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Siegrist J, Wege N, Pühlhofer F, Wahrendorf M (2008) A short generic measure of work stress in the era globalization: effor-reward imbalance. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 82(8):1005–1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Karasek R, Brisson C, Kawakami N, Houtman I, Bongers P, Amick B (1998) The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. J Occup Health Psychol 3(4):322–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pejtersen JH, Kristensen TS, Borg V, Bjorner JB (2010) The second version of the copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire. Scand J Public Health 38(3):8–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smith A, Johal S, Wadsworth E, Davey G, Peters T (2000) The scale of occupational stress: The Bristol Stress and Health at Work Study (CRR 265/2000). Health and Safety ExecutiveGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Winwood P, Lushington K, Winefield A (2006) Further development and validation of the occupational fatigue exhaustion recovery (OFER) scale. J Occup Environ Med 48:381–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software (2012) Release 12. College Station, Texas: StataCorp LPGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    US Department of Health Human Services (2004) The health consequences of smoking: a report of the Surgeon GeneralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Adamo DE, Martin BJ, Johnson PW (2002) Vibration-induced muscle fatigue, a possible contribution to musculoskeletal injury. Eur J Appl Physiol 88(1):134–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Seri RK, Norhidayah H, Mohd SO (2013) A study on muscle fatigue associated with awkward posture among workers in aerospace industry. Adv Eng Forum 10:287CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Baiduri Widanarko
    • 1
    • 2
  • Robiana Modjo
    • 1
    • 2
  • Julia Rantetampang
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Occupational Health and Safety, Faculty of Public HealthUniversitas IndonesiaDepokIndonesia
  2. 2.Center of Assessment and Application of Occupational Health and Safety, Faculty of Public HealthUniversitas IndonesiaDepokIndonesia

Personalised recommendations