Using Natural Gesture Interactions Leads to Higher Usability and Presence in a Computer Lesson

  • Shannon K. T. BaileyEmail author
  • Cheryl I. Johnson
  • Valerie K. Sims
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 826)


In the last few years, motion-tracking technology has become much more accurate and cost effective, opening the door to advances in natural user interfaces (NUIs), such as gesture-based human-computer interactions. Gesture-based interactions involve using the body to input a command in a computer system. The degree to which NUIs are easy to use should be addressed by research as these technologies become more widespread. Before the usefulness of NUIs can be assessed and optimal interfaces refined, the extent to which NUIs are “natural” or “intuitive” should be determined. The purpose of the present study was to determine how natural gestural computer interactions are perceived by users in a computer-based science lesson. An experiment was conducted comparing natural gestures to arbitrary gestures in a computer lesson to answer the research question of how natural gestures are perceived by users in terms of system usability and presence. Perceived usability of the computer lesson was measured using the System Usability Scale. Natural gestures were rated almost a full point higher in usability (on a 5-point scale) than arbitrary gestures. Presence (i.e., the feeling of “being there” in a virtual environment) was also measured after the computer lesson using the Presence Questionnaire. Natural gesture interactions were seen as inducing a higher sense of control in the computer lesson, more immersion, and better interface quality than arbitrary gesture interactions. The finding that natural gestures are perceived as more usable and contribute to higher feelings of presence should encourage instructional designers and researchers to keep the user in mind when developing gesture-based interactions.


Gesture Human-computer interaction Natural user interface Presence Usability 


  1. 1.
    Schwartz RN, Plass JL (2014) Click versus drag: User-performed tasks and the enactment effect in an interactive multimedia environment. Comput Hum Behav 33:242–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grandhi SA, Joue G, Mittelberg I (2010) Understanding naturalness and intuitiveness in gesture production: insights for touchless gestural interfaces. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 821–824. ACMGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shiratuddin MF, Wong KW (2011) Non-contact multi-hand gestures interaction techniques for architectural design in a virtual environment. In: Proceedings of international conference on information technology and multimediaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bailey SKT (2017) Getting the upper hand: Natural gesture interactions improve instructional efficiency on a conceptual computer lesson [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Central FloridaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brooke J (1996) SUS: a “quick and dirty” usability scale. In: Jordan PW, Thomas B, Weerdmeester BA, McClelland IL (eds.) Usability evaluation in industry, pp 189–194. Taylor & Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Witmer BG, Jerome CJ, Singer MJ (2005) The factor structure of the presence questionnaire. Presence-Teleop Virt 14:298–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Field A (2013) Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics, p 876Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shannon K. T. Bailey
    • 1
    Email author
  • Cheryl I. Johnson
    • 1
  • Valerie K. Sims
    • 2
  1. 1.Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems DivisionOrlandoUSA
  2. 2.University of Central FloridaOrlandoUSA

Personalised recommendations