Advertisement

Identifying Factors Related to the Estimation of Near-Crash Events of Elderly Drivers

  • Misako Yamagishi
  • Takashi Yonekawa
  • Makoto Inagami
  • Toshihisa Sato
  • Motoyuki Aakamatsu
  • Hirofumi Aoki
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 826)

Abstract

This study attempted to identify factors associated with driving behavior of elderly drivers to assess their safety and estimate their risk during naturalistic driving. We performed binomial logistic regression using self-reported past crash involvement as a response variable to identify critical factors and provided an estimation model has 18 variables. However, applying driver category based on crash and near-crash events (CNCs) collected from naturalistic driving study employed on-dash cam instead of self-reported crash involvement to the previous model showed lower predictive performance (0.63 for sensitivity and 0.51 for specificity). This implies that the model based on self-reported crash experiences was difficult to detect for drivers with CNC during naturalistic driving. Then, we performed binomial logistic regression based on CNC involvement and indicated another model, where the predictive performance was improved, with 0.81 for sensitivity and 0.70 for specificity. To predict the number of CNCs as drivers’ risk, this study adopted Poisson regression analysis using nine variables selected from the second model. The analyses showed a plausible model and significant variables for the estimation of CNCs. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was one of the better predictor putting in this model, and showed the probability that lower performance associated with higher number of CNCs. This model for CNC estimation would be helpful for the development of safety programs for elderly drivers with possible incidents.

Keywords

Elderly drivers Poisson regression analysis Naturalistic driving 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This study was conducted with the support of the “Center of Innovation (COI) program,” which is part of the research result institute of the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST.) We have also listed the members who provided their cooperation with the collection and analysis of the DR data as a way to express our sincere gratitude.

References

  1. 1.
    Neale LV, Dingus AT, Klauer GS, Sudweeks J, Goodman M (2005) An overview of the 100-car naturalistic study and findings. National highway traffic safety administration paper number 05-0400 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Guo F, Fang Y (2013) Individual driver risk assessment using naturalistic driving data. Accid Anal Prev 61:3–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Guo F, Fang Y, Antin FJ (2015) Older driver fitness-to-drive evaluation using naturalistic driving data. J Saf Res 54:49–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huisingh C, Levitan BL, Marguerite RI, Maclennan P, Wadley V, Owsley C (2017) Visual sensory and visual-cognitive function and rate of crash and near-crash involvement among older drivers using naturalistic driving data. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 58(7):2959–2967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Anstey JK, Wood J, Lord S, Walker GJ (2005) Cognitive, sensory and physical factors enabling driving safety in older adults. Clin Psychol Rev 25(1):45–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Suto S, Kumada T (2010) Effects of age-related decline of visual attention, working memory and planning functions on use of IT-equipment. Jpn Psychol Res 52(3): 201–215Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    TransAnalytics Health & Safety Services. DrivingHealth.com. http://drivinghealth.com/. Accessed 18 Apr 2018
  8. 8.
    Akamatsu M, Hayama K, Takahashi J, Iwasaki A, Daigo H (2006) Cognitive and physical factors in changes to the automobile driving ability of elderly people and their mobility life: Questionnaire survey in various regions of Japan. IATSS Res 30(1):38–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sato T, Akamatsu M, Aoki H, Kanamori H, Yamagishi M (2016) Relations between elderly drivers cognitive functions and their compensatory driving behaviors. Humanist 5th ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stanton AN, Landry S, Di Bucchianico G, Vallicelli, A (2014) Advances in human aspects of transportation. In: Proceedings of the AHFE 2014 International Conference on Human Factors in TransportationGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ball K, Owsley C (1991) Identifying correlated of accident involvement for the older driver. Hum Factor 33(5):583–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Misako Yamagishi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Takashi Yonekawa
    • 2
  • Makoto Inagami
    • 2
  • Toshihisa Sato
    • 3
  • Motoyuki Aakamatsu
    • 3
  • Hirofumi Aoki
    • 2
  1. 1.Aichi Shukutoku UniversityNagakuteJapan
  2. 2.Nagoya UniversityNagoyaJapan
  3. 3.National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and TechnologyTsukubaJapan

Personalised recommendations