Advertisement

Self-management Process After a Work Accident: A Gender Analysis

  • Liliana Cunha
  • Cláudia Pereira
  • Marta Santos
  • Marianne Lacomblez
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 826)

Abstract

The return to the professional activity after a work accident corresponds to a complex process, whose path often reveals inequality factors, especially if we look at it through the gender lens.

Under the scope of the project “Return-to-work after an accident: to overcome obstacles” carried out in Portugal together with the National Association of Disabled Workers Injured On-the-job, with 371 participants, the circumstances and the consequences of the work accidents were analyzed.

Although the gender dimension was not considered at the origin of the investigation, the study’s methodological layout took into account the representativeness of men and women for the purposes of sample constitution and findings’ analysis – findings that show a clear inequality especially in the moments prior to the accident and in the reinsertion process.

Consequently, there seems to be a tendency towards the precariousness in the job and working conditions after the accident: for men, apart from the salary, the unemployment allowance emerges as the main source of income, while in the case of women the sick pay prevails as income source. From the perspective of the working conditions of those who return to the same company after the accident, most participants do not get a readjusted workstation or work schedule and there is a sense that the job is on the line, reported particularly by women.

Keywords

Work accident Paths Gender 

References

  1. 1.
    Vendramin P, Valenduc G (2014) A gender perspective on older workers’ employment and working conditions. European Trade Union Institute, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hareven T, Masaoka K (1988) Turning points and transitions: perceptions of the life course. J Fam Hist 13(3):271–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ramos S (2010) Envelhecimento, trabalho e cognição: do laboratório para o terreno na construção de uma alternativa metodológica. Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, LisboaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cunha L, Santos M, Pereira C (2017) Return to employment after a work-related accident: how he/she defines himself/herself in relation to others. ETUI Seminar: His and Hers occupational hazards, health, justice and prevention actors. ITUH, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pereira C, Rodrigues V (2018, accepted) A reconstituição de experiências após um acidente de trabalho: mapas de percurso com instrumento de análise. Laboreal, 14(1)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centro de Psicologia da Universidade do Porto, FPCEUP, Universidade do PortoPortoPortugal
  2. 2.Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação da Universidade do PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations