Advertisement

Digital Making as an Opportunity for Social Inclusion

  • Marita Canina
  • Carmen Bruno
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 826)

Abstract

Within the framework of the EU-funded project ‘Digital Do-It-Yourself (DiDIY), we have explored the dynamics facilitating the acquisition of different competencies in this practice.

Rooted in design and construction, the digital making activities often emphasize the acquisition of problem-solving, critical thinking, creativity, cross-disciplinarily and collaboration.

Starting from the results of the Digital DIY project has come to light that the developed process can also facilitate inclusivity. The contemporary phenomenon of “digital making” linked to “make” enabled by digital technologies (e.g., Web 2.0, 3D printers) is a meaningful context for social inclusion through interpersonal productive activities.

In this paper, we will first define such competencies as a result of a comparative study of the literature analysis. The analysis of the current scenario of digital DIY as a social innovation phenomenon enabled us to define a model through which it was possible to identify the fundamental dynamics and factors for skilling. The same model can allow the replication and adaptation of such dynamics into a different environment, such as the social inclusion.

We will conclude with the proposal of transferring the skilling dynamics identified in digital DIY to promote social inclusion of elderly.

The DiDIY co-design model, developed during the EU projects, includes the development of tools that facilitate the involvement of people in the design process merging digital making and skills improvement. The social empowerment and the individual creativity and self-improvement skills are crucial elements to avoid social exclusion.

Keywords

Social inclusion Elderly Digital making 

References

  1. 1.
    European Project Digital Do It Yourself (DiDIY). http://www.didiy.eu/
  2. 2.
    Bruno C, Salvia G, Canina M (2016) Digital self-production as a means to improve education. In: 10th international technology, education and development conference 2016, Valencia, pp 2304–2310Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Salvia G, Bruno C, Canina M (2016) Skilling and learning through digital Do-It-Yourself: the role of (Co)Design. In: DRS2016: Design+ Research+ society-future-focused thinking. Design Research Society, Brighton, pp 2077–2089Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Atkinson P (2006) Do it yourself: democracy and design. J Des Hist 19(1):10Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Anderson C (2012) Makers: the new industrial revolution. McClelland & Stewart, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    European Commission (2007) Key competences for lifelong learning. European Reference Framework0Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    The Partnership of 21st Century Skills (2008) 21st century skills, education & competitiveness. A resource and policy guideGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vossoughi S, Bevan B (2014) Making and tinkering: a review of the literature. In: National Research Council Committee on out of school time STEM, pp 1–55Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peppler K, Bender S (2013) Maker movement spreads innovation one project at a time. Phi Delta Kappan 95(3):6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hielscher S, Smith A (2014) Community-based digital fabrication workshops: a review of the research literature (No. 08). SPRU Working Paper SeriesGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ree R (2011) Master thesis: 3D printing: convergences, frictions, fluidity, University of TorontoGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Naegele G, Schnabel E (2010) Measures for social inclusion of the elderly: the case of volunteering. Working paper. European foundation for the improvement of living and working conditions, Ireland. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/report/2010/quality-of-life-social-policies/measures-for-social-inclusion-of-the-elderly-the-case-of-volunteering-working-paper. Accessed 28 May 2018
  13. 13.
    World Health Organization (2002) The world health report 2002: reducing risks, promoting healthy life. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    United Nation (2002) Report of the second world assembly on ageing Madrid, New York, 8–12 April 2002. http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/CONF.197/9
  15. 15.
    Kahana E, Kahana B, Kercher K (2003) Ageing Int 28:155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Murray R, Caulier-Grice J, Mulgan G (2010) The open book of social innovation. Nesta and Young Foundation, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Benkler Y, Nissenbaum H (2006) Commons-based peer production and virtue. J Polit Philos 14(4):394–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gauntlett D (2011) Making is connecting: the social meaning of creativity, from DIY and knitting to YouTube and Web 2.0. Polity Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Soderberg J (2013) Automating amateurs in the 3D printing community. Work Organ Labour Globalisation 7(1):124–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Olphert CW, Damodaran L, May AJ (2010) Towards digital inclusion-engaging older people in the ‘digital world’. In: Accessible design in the digital world conference 2005, Dundee, Scotland. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b312/dac0a90bbdfeffc8b4348a5793593fbc58a1.pdf. Accessed 28 May 2018
  21. 21.
    Hill R, Betts L, Gardner S (2015) Older adults’ experiences and perceptions of digital technology: (Dis)empowerment, wellbeing, and inclusion. Comput Hum Behav 48:415–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sanders E, Chan P (2007) Emerging trends in design research. In: IASDR07 - International Association of Societies of Design Research, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, School of Design, Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    IDEActivity: Codesign in the Digital DIY scenario. Toolkit and guidelines (2017). http://www.ideactivity.polimi.it/toolkits/. Accessed 18 Dec 2017

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Politecnico di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations