Advertisement

Mediating Role of Loneliness and Organizational Conflict Between Work Overload and Turnover Intention

  • Serpil Aytac
  • Oguz Basol
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 827)

Abstract

The fact that organizations offer employees a positive organizational climate not only increases employees’ happiness levels but also raises the level of creativity of employees. When it is thought that the only way for organizations to survive in a competitive environment is innovative and creative applications, the positive dynamics within the organization once again emerges. This research focuses on negative behaviors such as work overload, loneliness, organizational conflict and turnover intention which affect employees’ creativity and it aims to discover the mediating role of loneliness and organizational conflict between work overload and turnover intention. In the present research, a survey was conducted including 145 service sector employees. To analyze the demographic characteristics of the participants, internal consistency and correlations of scales, SPSS 22.0; and to test the mediating role, SmartPLS 2.0 were used. According to the analysis results; it is determined that between work overload and turnover intention, loneliness and organizational conflict have a mediating role. When all the results are evaluated together, work overload in the organization forces employees to extreme behavior and it is found that employees feel loneliness or conflict, and as a result, their turnover intention increases. Related to this, it is possible to say that the overloaded employees get further away from creativity.

Keywords

Work overload Loneliness Conflict Turnover intention 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank MBT Translation and Interpreting Services for them assistance in proof-reading and editing of this manuscript.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

  1. 1.
    Qureshi MI, Iftikhar M, Abbas SG, Hassan U, Khan K, Zaman K (2013) Relationship between job stress, workload, environment and employees turnover intentions: what we know, what should we know. World Appl Sci J 23(6):764–770Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cam E (2004) Çalışma Yaşamında Stres ve Kamu Kesiminde Kadın Çalışanlar. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi 1(1):1–10Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Keser A, Kümbül Güler B (2016) Çalışma Psikolojisi. Umuttepe Yayınları, KocaeliGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Coşkuner S, Şener A (2013) Akademisyenlerin İş ve Aile Karakteristiklerinin Evlilik, Aile ve Yaşam Tatmini ile İlişkisi: İş ve Aile Çatışmasının Aracı Rolü. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyolojik Araştırmalar E-Dergisi, 1–25 Kasım 2013Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dağdeviren N, Musaoğlu Z, Ömürlü İK, Öztora S (2011) Akademisyenlerde İş Doyumunu Etkileyen Faktörler. Balkan Med J 28(4):69–74Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Demirbaş B, Haşit D (2016) İş Yerinde Yalnızlık ve İşten Ayrılma Niyetine Etkisi: Akademisyenler Üzerine Bir Uygulama. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 16(1):137–158Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Radzali FM, Ahmad A, Omar Z (2013) Workload, job stress, family-to-work conflict and deviant workplace behavior. Int J Acad Res Bus Soc Sci 3(12):109–115Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Suozzo SH (2015) The effect of workload, job satisfaction, and role conflict on the timing of leaving of nursing faculty from their current faculty position. PhD Thesis, Seton Hall UniversityGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xiaoming Y, Ma B-J, Chang CL, Shieh C-J (2014) Effects of workload on burnout and turnover intention of medical staff: a study. Stud Ethno-Med 8(3):229–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wright SL (2005) Loneliness in the Workplace. PhD Thesis in Psychology, University of Canterbury. Christchurch. New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wright SL, Burt CDB, Strongman KT (2006) Loneliness in the workplace: construct definition and scale development. NZ J Psychol 35(2):59–68Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Çetin A, Alacalar A (2016) İş Yaşamında Yalnızlığı Yordamada Kişilik Özellikleri ile Algılanan Sosyal ve Örgütsel Desteğin Rolü. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi 12(27):193–216Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Erdil O, Ertosun ÖG (2011) The relationship between social climate and loneliness in the workplace and effects on employee well-being. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 24:505–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ertosun ÖG, Erdil O (2012) The effects of loneliness on employees’ commitment and intention to leave. Procedia – Soc Behav Sci 41:469–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chana SH, Qiu HH (2011) Loneliness, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment of migrant workers: empirical evidence from China. Int J Hum Resour Manag 22(5):1109–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rahim MA (2002) Toward a theory of managing organizational conflict. Int J Conflict Manag 3(13):206–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tozkoparan G (2013) Beş Faktör Kişilik Özelliklerinin Çatışma Yönetim Tarzlarına Etkisi: Yöneticililer Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi 9(9):189–231Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wickham RE, Williamson RE, Beard CL, Kobayashi CLB, Hirst TW (2016) Authenticity attenuates the negative effects of interpersonal conflict on daily well-being. J Res Pers 60:56–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Leon-Perez JM, Medina FJ, Arenas A, Munduate L (2015) The relationship between interpersonal conflict and workplace bullying. J Manag Psychol 30(3):250–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Karcıoğlu F, Kahya C, Buzkan K (2012) Çatışma Yönetim Stratejisinin Tahmin Edicileri Olarak Örgütsel Kültür Tipleri. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 26(1):77–91Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Takase M (2010) A Concept analysis of turnover intention: implications for nursing management. Collegian 17:3–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Onay M, Kılcı S (2011) İş Stresi ve Tükenmişlik Duygusunun İşten Ayrılma Niyeti Üzerine Etkileri: Garsonlar ve Aşçıbaşılar. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimler Dergisi 3(2):363–372Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Galletta M, Portoghese I, Battistelli A, Leiter MP (2013) The roles of unit leadership and nurse-physician collaboration on nursing turnover intention. J Adv Nurs 69:1771–1784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nelsey L, Brownie S (2012) Effective leadership, teamwork and mentoring essential elements in promoting generational cohesion in the nursing workforce and retaining nurses. Collegian 19:197–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kelly LA, McHugh MD, Aiken LH (2011) Nurse outcomes in magnet(r) and nonmagnet hospitals. J Nurs Adm 41:428–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Spector PE, Jex SM (1998) Development of four self-report measures of job stressors and strain: interpersonal conflict at work scale, organizational constraint scale, quantitative workload inventory, and physical symptoms inventory. J Occup Health Psychol 3:356–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Keser A, Öngen Bilir B, Aytaç S (2017) Niceliksel İş Yükü Envanterinin Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. İş-Güç Endüstri İlişkileri Dergisi 19(2):55–78Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Doğan T, Çetin B, Sungur MZ (2009) İş Yaşamında Yalnızlık Ölçeği Türkçe Formunun Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirlik Çalışması. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi 10:271–277Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cook JD, Hepworth SJ, Wall TD, Warr PB (1981) The experience of work a compendium and review of 249 measures and their use. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Teoman DD (2007) Performans Değerlendirme Sürecinde Oluşan Adalet Algısı, Bu Algının İç, Dış ve Sosyal Ödüllerle Olan İlişkisinin İşten Ayrılma Niyetine Olan Etkisi, Master Thesis of Psychology, Istanbul UniversityGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Baron MR, Kenny D (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(6):1173–1182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bayram N (2010) Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş: AMOS Uygulamaları. Ezgi Kitabevi, BursaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Uludag UniversityBursaTurkey
  2. 2.Kırklareli UniversityKırklareliTurkey

Personalised recommendations