Advertisement

Ergonomics and Acoustics in Music Education

  • Orlando Maria Patrizia
  • Lo Castro Fabio
  • Iarossi Sergio
  • Mariconte Raffaele
  • Longo Lucia
  • Giliberti Claudia
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 827)

Abstract

In music education, teachers and students often complain about acoustical discomfort. The facilities dedicated to study and musical training play an important role in risk assessment and have to respect standards on architectural acoustics. In particular, bad sound insulation of the classrooms, sound level emitted by musical and/or vocal instruments, high level of background noise and an unsuitable reverberation time, can compromise learning and performances and could cause pathologies (especially to auditory system and vocal apparatus) due to excessive noise levels and acoustical discomfort. The work aims to estimate the potential risk for music teachers and students in an Italian conservatory, identifying critical issues by collecting objective and subjective information. Measurement campaigns, medical evaluations, questionnaires have been performed to identify critical issues related to ergonomic discomfort. 129 workers were examined. The measurement campaign has detected that insulation values and reverberation times were often not adequate for the purpose of the classrooms. Moreover, the social survey has pointed out a high discomfort both among teachers and students The analysis of the singers’ voices in relation to the posture has allowed to identify possible solutions to remedy the pathologies related to the relationship between vocal effort and posture.

Keywords

Noise Acoustics Voice 

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Isaac MJ, McBroom DH, Nguyen SA, Halstead LA (2017) Prevalence of hearing loss in teachers of singing and voice students. J. Voice 31(3):379-e21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Olson AD, Gooding LF, Shikoh F, Graf J (2016) Hearing health in college instrumental musicians and prevention of hearing loss. Med Probl Perform 31(1):29–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cooper CL, Dewe P, O’Driscoll M (2001) Organizational stress: a review and critique of theory, research, and applications. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cantley LF, Galusha D, Cullen MR, Dixon-Ernst C, Rabinowitz PM, Neitzel RL (2015) Association between ambient noise exposure, hearing acuity, and risk of acute occupational injury. Scand J Work Environ Health 41:75–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yoon J, Hong J, Roh J (2015) Dose - response relationship between noise exposure and the risk of occupational injury. Noise Health 17(74):43–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sound advice: Control of noise at work in music and entertainment, Heath and Safety Executive (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Parra L, Torres M, Lloret J, Campos A, Bosh I (2018) Assisted protection headphone proposal to prevent chronic exposure to percussion instruments on musicians. J Healthc Eng 11Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    DPCM. Requisiti acustici passivi degli edifici, 5 December 1997Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Legge 26 ottobre 1995, no 447, Legge quadro sull’inquinamento acusticoGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Decree of the President of the Province of Bolzano, 7 July 2008, no 26Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    UNI EN ISO 3382-1-2008. “Acoustics - Measurement of acoustic parameters of environments - Part 1: Showrooms”Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    UNI 11367 (2010) Building acoustics - Acoustic classification of real estate units - Assessment and verification procedure in progressGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    UNI 11532-1 (2018) Building acoustics - Internal acoustic characteristics of confined spacesGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ministerial circular no 3150 (22 May 1967) “Evaluation criteria and testing of acoustic requirements in school buildings”; Ministerial Decree 18 December 1975 “Technical standards relating to school buildings, including the minimum indexes of teaching functionality, building and urban planning- to be observed in the execution of school building works”Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    ANSI S12.60-2002 (2002) American National Standard Acoustical Performance Criteria, Design Requirements, and Guidelines for SchoolsGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Building Bulletin 93 (28 May 2003) Acoustic design of schools - performance standards, UK, 2014; Arrêté du 25 avril 2003 relatif à la limitation du bruit dans les établissements d’nseignement JOGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    DIN 18041:2016-03 Hörsamkeit in Räumen - Anforderungen, Empfehlungen und Hinweise für die Planung (Acoustic quality in rooms- Specifications and instructions for the room acoustic design)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    UNI EN ISO 9612 Acustica - Determinazione dell’esposizione al rumore negli ambienti di lavoro - Metodo tecnico progettualeGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
    Jacobson B et al (1997) The voice handicap index (VHI): development and validation. J Speech-Lang Path 6:66–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Orlando Maria Patrizia
    • 1
  • Lo Castro Fabio
    • 2
  • Iarossi Sergio
    • 2
  • Mariconte Raffaele
    • 3
  • Longo Lucia
    • 1
  • Giliberti Claudia
    • 3
  1. 1.Dipartimento Organi di SensoUniversità Sapienza RomeRomeItaly
  2. 2.CNR I.N.S.E.A.N., sezione Acustica e Sensoristica Orso Mario CorbinoRomeItaly
  3. 3.INAIL Dipartimento Innovazioni Tecnologiche e Sicurezza degli Impianti, Prodotti ed Insediamenti AntropiciRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations