Advertisement

Improving Lighting Quality by Practical Measurements of the Luminance Distribution

  • Thijs Kruisselbrink
  • Juliëtte van Duijnhoven
  • Rajendra Dangol
  • Alexander Rosemann
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 827)

Abstract

Light is one of the important aspects for a comfortable office environment. Too often high quality lighting is not achieved. Lighting quality can be defined by different aspects that are relevant such as the quantity, distribution, glare, spectral power distribution, daylight, directionality, and dynamics of light.

The luminance distribution seems to be a suitable measure to achieve high quality lighting. The luminance distribution can be measured, with a practical accuracy, by commercially available cameras and fisheye lenses. All these aspects spectral power distribution can be measured using a camera-based luminance distribution measurement device. So, a luminance distribution measurement device is an excellent tool to measure or indicate lighting quality. It can be used to achieve a better understanding of lighting quality and potentially it can be implemented in automated building control systems.

Keywords

Luminance distribution Lighting quality Measurements 

References

  1. 1.
    Veitch JA, Newsham GR (1998) Determinants of lighting quality I: state of the science. J Illum Eng Soc 27:92–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boyce PR (2014) Human Factors in Lighting, 3rd edn. CRC Press, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Veitch JA, Newsham GR (n.d.) Determinants of Lighting Quality I: State of the ScienceGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kruisselbrink T, Dangol R, Rosemann A (2018) Photometric measurements of lighting quality: an overview. Build Environ 138:42–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.04.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Van Den Wymelenberg K, Inanici M (2014) A critical investigation of common lighting design metrics for predicting human visual comfort in offices with daylight. LEUKOS 10:145–164.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15502724.2014.881720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rea MS (2000) The IESNA lighting handbook. Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    European Committee For Standardization (2009) NEN-EN 12464-1: Light and lighting - Lighting of work places - Part 1: Indoor work placesGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bodrogi P, Brückner S, Khanh TQ (2010) Dimensions of light source colour quality. In: Conference on colour graphics, imaging and vision, pp 155–159Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kruisselbrink T, Aries M, Rosemann A (2017) A practical device for measuring the luminance distribution. Int J Sustain Light 36:75–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Inanici MN (2006) Evaluation of high dynamic range photography as a luminance data acquisition system. Light Res Technol 38:123–136.  https://doi.org/10.1191/1365782806li164oaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sarkar A, Mistrick RG (2006) A novel lighting control system integrating high dynamic range imaging and DALI. LEUKOS 2:307–322.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15502724.2006.10747642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tohsing K, Schrempf M, Riechelmann S, Schilke H, Seckmeyer G (2013) Measuring high-resolution sky luminance distributions with a CCD camera. Appl Opt 52:1564–1573.  https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.52.001564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reinhard E, Ward G, Pattanaik S, Debevec P (2006) High dynamic range imaging: acquisition, display, and image-based lighting (the Morgan Kaufmann series in computer graphics). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San FransiscoGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moeck M, Anaokar S (2006) Illuminance analysis from high dynamic range images. LEUKOS 2:211–228Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cai H, Chung T (2011) Improving the quality of high dynamic range images. Light Res Technol 43:87–102.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153510371356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ward G (n.d.) Anyhere Software. http://www.anyhere.com/. Accessed 7 Mar 2016
  17. 17.
    Mead A, Mosalam K (2016) Ubiquitous luminance sensing using the Raspberry Pi and camera module system. Light Res Technol 1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153516649229
  18. 18.
    Mitsunaga T, Nayar SK (1999) Radiometric self calibration. In: IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, vol 1, pp 374–380. IEEE Computer Society, Fort Collins.  https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.1999.786966
  19. 19.
    Pascale D (n.d.) A Review of RGB Color SpacesGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Inanici MN (2010) Evalution of high dynamic range image-based sky models in lighting simulation. Leukos 7:69–84.  https://doi.org/10.1582/LEUKOS.2010.07.02001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wüller D, Gabele H (2007) The usage of digital cameras as luminance meters. In: Electronic imaging conference, vol 6502, San Jose, USA, pp. 1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1117/12.703205
  22. 22.
    Cauwerts C, Bodart M, Deneyer A (2012) Comparison of the vignetting effects of two identical fisheye lenses. LEUKOS 8:181–203Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ulbricht R (1920) Das Kugelphotometer. Verlag Oldenburg, Berlin Und MunchenGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wienold J, Christoffersen J (2006) Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction model for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras. Energy Build 38:743–757.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wienold J (2015) EvalglareGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nabil A, Mardaljevic J (2006) Useful daylight illuminances: a replacement for daylight factors. Energy Build 38:905–913.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hellinga H, Hordijk T (2014) The D&V analysis method: a method for the analysis of daylight access and view quality. Build Environ 79:101–114.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.04.032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cuttle C (2014) Research note: a practical approach to cubic illuminance measurement. Light Res Technol 46:31–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dubois M-C, Gentile N, Naves David Amorim C, Geisler-Moroder D, Jakobiak R, Matusiak B, et al. Monitoring protocol for lighting and daylighting retrofits: A Technical Report of Subtask D (Case Studies), T50.D3 (2016)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Howlett O, Heschong L, Mchugh J (2007) Scoping study for daylight metrics from luminance maps scoping study for daylight metrics from luminance maps. LEUKOS 3:201–215.  https://doi.org/10.1582/LEUKOS.2007.03.03.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rockcastle S, Andersen M (2014) Measuring the dynamics of contrast & daylight variability in architecture: a proof-of-concept methodology. Build Environ 81:320–333.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.06.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Eindhoven University of TechnologyEindhovenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Intelligent Lighting InstituteEindhovenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations