Advertisement

The Relation of Visual-Digital Literacy in User Interaction with Mobile Devices

  • Patrícia Carrion
  • Manuela Quaresma
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 827)

Abstract

The rapid pace of technological innovation highlights the issues of users’ relation with the digital sphere, and, in regards to graphical interfaces, shows the existence of a Visual-Digital Literacy. This paper proposes as an overall intention to investigate the impact of Visual Literacy in users’ access to smartphones. To that effect, we hypothesize that a limited visual repertoire is a direct cause of users’ deficiency in Digital Literacy skills. We defined two evaluation techniques: an Iconographic Comprehension Test and an experiment. The convergence of both sought to answer the following research question: how does Visual Literacy relate to users’ digital proficiency? First, we applied the Comprehension Test to detect the proper understanding of symbols, i.e., to measure users’ ability to interpret visual elements. The test proposed the classification of 48 subjects, ranging from 18 to 65 years old, in two extremes of Visual Literacy. Afterward, using extreme case sampling, we recruited 12 of said subjects to our experiment, seeking to assess the impact that Visual Literacy has on Digital Literacy, while users performed tasks on a smartphone. We used three methods of qualitative and quantitative data analysis to measure users’ performance: Student’s t-test and Pearson Correlation Coefficient, followed by Retrospective Think Aloud (RTA) protocol. The results showed that Visual Literacy does influence users’ performance in the interaction with devices, proving that Digital Literacy relates to people’s visual repertoires.

Keywords

Digital Literacy Visual Literacy Human-Computer Interaction 

References

  1. 1.
    Burdick A, Drucker J, Lunenfeld P, Presner T, Schnapp J (2012) Digital humanities. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Landow GP (2006) Hypertext 3.0: critical theory and new media in an era of globalization. JHU Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Potter J (1996) Discourse analysis and constructionist approaches: theoretical background. In: Richardson JTE (ed) Handbook of qualitative research methods for psychology and the social sciences. British Psychological Society, Leicester, pp 125–140Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hartson R, Pyla PS (2012) The UX book: process and guidelines for ensuring a quality user experience. Elsevier, Morgan KaufmannGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Prensky M (2001) Digital natives. Digit Immigr Horiz 9(5):1–6Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Claypoole VL, Schroeder BL, Mishler AD (2016) Keeping in touch: tactile interface design for older users. Ergon Des Quart Human Factors Appl 24(1):18–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beheshti J, Large JA (2006) Interface design, web portals, and children. Libr. Trends 54(2):318–342Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chan AHS, Mahastama AW, Saptadi TS (2013) Designing usable icons for non e-literate user. In: Proceedings of the international multiconference of engineers and computer scientists (IMECS), vol. 2. Newswood Limited, Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dong Y, Lee K (2008) A Cross-cultural comparative study of users’ perceptions of a webpage: with a focus on the cognitive styles of Chinese, Koreans and Americans. Int J Des 2(2):19–30Google Scholar
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    de Lemos Formiga E (2002) Comprehensibility assessment of graphical symbols through methods of informational ergonomics (Avaliação de Compreensibilidade de Símbolos Gráficos Através de Métodos da Ergonomia Informacional). In: Moraes A (org) Warnings and signaling project: informational ergodesign (Avisos, Advertências e Projeto de Sinalização: Ergodesign Informacional). iUsEr, Rio de Janeiro, pp 113–141Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Net Market Share. https://netmarketshare.com/. Accessed 20 Jan 2018
  13. 13.
    Pituch KA, Whittaker TA, Stevens JP (2015) Intermediate statistics: a modern approach. Routledge, OxfordshireGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rubin J, Chisnell D (2008) Handbook of usability testing: how to plan, design and conduct effective tests, 2nd edn. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wickens CD, Gordon SE, Liu Y (1997) An introduction to human factors engineering. Addison Wesley Longman, BostonGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Minitab. http://www.minitab.com/Accessed 19 Jan 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de JaneiroRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations