Advertisement

What Can Be Revived (and What Cannot)

  • Lucas John Mix
Chapter

Abstract

Aristotle’s nutritive soul remains one of the best descriptions of organismality or vegetable life. Darwin’s evolution by natural selection explains the complex organization of extant life. Kant’s causal nexus unifies natural selection (as a string of efficient causes) and the apparent purposiveness of life (as a final cause). We need only make this process of natural selection the identity or essence of life (as formal cause). Then we can say that a single process, in action and in fulfillment, acts as the efficient, formal, and final cause of a living being. Life is an active, chemical processes whose cause, identity, and purpose are self-perpetuation. The vegetable life-concept can be revived in modern biology through evolution and biological nominalism.

References

  1. Foucault, Michel. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Vintage, 1994.Google Scholar
  2. Goff, Philip, William Seager, and Sean Allen-Hermanson. “Panpsychism.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2017 ed. Stanford University, 1997–. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/panpsychism/.
  3. Haig, David. “The Strategic Gene.” Biology and Philosophy 27, no. 4 (2012): 461–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Haig, David. “Fighting the Good Cause: Meaning, Purpose, Difference, and Choice.” Biology and Philosophy 29, no. 5 (2014): 675–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Mayr, Ernst. “Cause and Effect in Biology: Kinds of Causes, Predictability, and Teleology Are Viewed by a Practicing Biologist.” Science 134 (1961): 1501–1506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Mayr, Ernst. “Teleological and Teleonomic, A New Analysis.” Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14 (1974): 91–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mix, Lucas J. “Defending Definitions of Life.” Astrobiology 15, no. 1 (2015): 15–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mix, Lucas J. “Nested Explanation in Aristotle and Mayr.” Synthese 193, no. 6 (2016): 1817–1832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nagel, Thomas. Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Plantinga, Alvin. Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Schrödinger, Erwin. What Is Life? The Physical Aspect of the Living Cell; With, Mind and Matter & Autobiographical Sketches. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lucas John Mix
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Organismic and Evolutionary BiologyHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations