Advertisement

Ghosts in the Machine: Vitalism

  • Lucas John Mix
Chapter

Abstract

Questions of organismal unity and purpose remained problematic under the mechanical paradigm. Alternative paradigms emerged. Though wildly different, they all attracted the label vitalism for rejecting aspects of the mechanical philosophy. Animists such as Stahl simply opted for a return to vegetable souls. Van Helmont and other iatrochemists sought life-specific material and efficient causes. Self-identified vitalists proposed vital spirits and forces, including archei, sensibilité, mesmerism, galvanism, élan vital, and entelechy. German Idealists, meanwhile, pushed for more subjectivity and spirituality within the non-human world. They have largely been rejected and labelled “vitalist” because their position do not fit with current ideas of mechanism, but many were important to the later development of biology. A critical distinction hangs on how we use the term “nature.”

References

  1. Canguilhem, Georges. Knowledge of Life. New York: Fordham University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
  2. Foucault, Michel. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Vintage, 1994.Google Scholar
  3. Hegel, G.W.F. Hegel’s Philosophy of Nature. Translated by A.V. Miller. Oxford, UK: Clarendon, 2004.Google Scholar
  4. Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. The Leibniz-stahl Controversy. Translated by François Duchesneau and Justin E.H. Smith. The Yale Leibniz. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
  5. Lewes, George Henry. The Problems of Life and Mind, 2 vols. Boston: Osgood and Company, 1874, (1875).Google Scholar
  6. Marder, Michael. The Philosopher’s Plant: An Intellectual Herbarium. New York: Columbia University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Martin, Raymond, and John Barresi. The Rise and Fall of Soul and Self: An Intellectual History of Personal Identity. New York: Columbia University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
  8. Mill, John Stuart. Nature, the Utility of Religion, and Theism, 3rd ed. London: Longman, Green, 1885.Google Scholar
  9. Miller, Elaine P. The Vegetative Soul: From Philosophy of Nature to Subjectivity in the Feminine. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  10. O’Connor, Timothy, and Hong Yu Wong. “Emergent Properties.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer 2015 ed. Stanford University, 1997–. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/properties-emergent/.
  11. Oken, Lorenz. Elements of Physiophilosophy. Translated by Alfred Tulk. London: C. and J. Adlard, 1847.Google Scholar
  12. Osler, Margaret J. Reconfiguring the World: Nature, God, and Human Understanding from the Middle Ages to Early Modern Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
  13. Rey, Roselyne. “Psyche, Soma, and the Vitalist Philosophy of Medicine.” In Psyche and Soma: Physicians and Metaphysicians on the Mind-Body Problem from Antiquity to Enlightenment, edited by John P. Wright and Paul Potter, 255–265. Oxford: Clarendon, 2000.Google Scholar
  14. Ruse, Michael. Darwin and Design: Does Evolution Have a Purpose? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  15. Ruse, Michael. Science and Spirituality: Making Room for Faith in the Age of Science. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wallace, Alfred Russel. The World of Life: A Manifestation of Creative Power, Directive Mind and Ultimate Purpose. London: Chapman and Hall, 1910.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lucas John Mix
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Organismic and Evolutionary BiologyHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations