Advertisement

An Effective Low-Light Image Enhancement Algorithm via Fusion Model

  • Ya-Min Wang
  • Zhan-Li Sun
  • Fu-Qiang Han
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10956)

Abstract

In a low-light condition, the quality of a captured image may be much poorer than that obtained in a normal environment. As an effective preprocessing step, many enhancement algorithms have been proposed to improve the performance of a computer vision task. In most existing algorithms, a image is often enhanced as a whole. As a result, the image may be over-enhanced or under-enhanced due to different degree of exposure in local area. Aiming at this issue, in this paper, we propose a low-light image enhancement algorithm based on image fusion technology. In the proposed method, a fusion strategy is devised by considering the exposure extent of local area. The weight matrix for image fusion is first calculated. Then, the pixel with insufficient exposure is selected according to the adaptive threshold. Next, the multi-exposure images can be synthesized by using the estimated optimal exposure rate. Finally, we use the input image to fuse with the enhanced image for slightly under-exposed images to get the enhancement image, while the severely under-exposed images can be enhanced by fusing a reflection map based on retinex with the enhanced image. Experimental results show that our method can obtain enhancement results with less color and lightness distortion compared to several state-of-the-art methods.

Keywords

Low-light image enhancement Image fusion Illumination estimation 

References

  1. 1.
    Pisano, E.D., Zong, S., Hemminger, B.M., et al.: Contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization image processing to improve the detection of simulated spiculations in dense mammograms. J. Digit. Imaging 11(4), 193 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abdullah-Al-Wadud, M., Kabir, M.M., Dewan, A.A., Chae, O.: A dynamic histogram equalization for image contrast enhancement. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. 53(2), 593–600 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Celik, T., Tjahjadi, T.: Contextual and variational contrast enhancement. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 20(12), 3431–3441 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee, C., Lee, C., Kim, C.-S.: Contrast enhancement based on layered difference representation of 2D histograms. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 22(12), 5372–5384 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang, S., Zheng, J., Hu, H.M., Li, B.: Naturalness preserved enhancement algorithm for non-uniform illumination images. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 22(9), 3538–3578 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elad, M.: Retinex by two bilateral filters. In: Kimmel, R., Sochen, N.A., Weickert, J. (eds.) Scale-Space 2005. LNCS, vol. 3459, pp. 217–229. Springer, Heidelberg (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1007/11408031_19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guo, X., Li, Y., Ling, H.: Lime: low-light image enhancement via illumination map estimation. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 26(2), 982–993 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    He, K., Sun, J., Tang, X.: Single image haze removal using dark channel prior. In: IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1956–1963 (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Narasimhan, S.G., Nayar, S.K.: Contrast restoration of weather degraded images. IEEE Computer Society (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Meng, G., Wang, Y., Duan, J., Xiang, S., Pan, C.: Efficient image dehazing with boundary constraint and contextual regularization. In: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 617–624 (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dong, X., Wang, G., Pang, Y., Li, W., Wen, J., Meng, W., Lu, Y.: Fast efficient algorithm for enhancement of low lighting video. In: IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, pp. 1–6 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ren, W., Liu, S., Zhang, H., Pan, J., Cao, X., Yang, M.-H.: Single image dehazing via multi-scale convolutional neural networks. In: Leibe, B., Matas, J., Sebe, N., Welling, M. (eds.) ECCV 2016, Part II. LNCS, vol. 9906, pp. 154–169. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46475-6_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ying, Z., Li, G., Ren, Y., Wang, R., Wang, W.: A new image contrast enhancement algorithm using exposure fusion framework. In: Felsberg, M., Heyden, A., Krüger, N. (eds.) CAIP 2017, Part II. LNCS, vol. 10425, pp. 36–46. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64698-5_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ying, Z., Li, G., Ren, Y., Wang, R., Wang, W.: A new low-light image enhancement algorithm using camera response model. In: International Conference on Computer Vision Workshop (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    He, K., Sun, J., Tang, X.: Guided image filtering. In: Daniilidis, K., Maragos, P., Paragios, N. (eds.) ECCV 2010, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6311, pp. 1–14. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15549-9_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Electrical Engineering and AutomationAnhui UniversityHefeiChina

Personalised recommendations