Advertisement

WT Model & Applications in Loan Platform Customer Default Prediction Based on Decision Tree Algorithms

  • Sulin Pang
  • Jinmeng Yuan
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10954)

Abstract

Due to the huge losses caused by the bad credit customers, loan platforms attach great attention to testing and forecasting of bad loans. From perspectives of both loan customer type identification and loan default prediction, we initially constructed a WT early warning model for loan default client prewarning based on C5.0 decision tree, CART decision tree and CHAID decision tree in this paper. WT model is set with weighted calculating algorithms. Considering the data characteristics of loan platform, we designed a posteriori combination algorithm of three sub-models: C5.0, CART, CHAID, and performance test indicators: sensitivity, accuracy, warning rate, false alarm rate. In empirical research, we used the real loan transaction dataset of a bank in Taiwan to construct the WT model of the bank, and found that WT model overcomes the shortcomings of each sub-model respectively and achieves effective prewarning of customer default. The experimental results show that the alarm rate of test data set is 26.93% and the false alarm rate is 18.33% and the accuracy rate is 81.67% when applying the WT model. Loan platforms can acquire both high customer default prediction accuracy and high alarm rate by applying WT prewarning model. Both the research method and experiment results in this paper are meaningful to loan platform operation.

Keywords

WT model Decision tree algorithms Customer default prewarning Loan platforms 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The paper is supported by Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants No. 91646112); The Key Programs of Science and Technology Department of Guangdong Province (Grants No. 2016A020224001).

References

  1. 1.
    Bache, K., Lichman, M.: UCI Machine Learning Repository (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li, X.L., Zhong, Y.: An overview of personal credit scoring: techniques and future work. Int. J. Intell. Sci. 2, 181–189 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pawlak, Z.: Rough sets. Int. J. Inf. Comput. Sci. 11(5), 341–356 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ge, P., Peng, M.: The optimization and application of the decision tree algorithm in the classification prediction 47, 936–939 (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Imtiaz, S., Brimicombe, A.J.: A better comparison summary of credit scoring classification. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 8, 1–4 (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bellalah, M., Zouari, S., Levyne, O.: The performance of hybrid models in the assessment of default risk. Econ. Model. 52, 259–265 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Xia, Y., Liu, C., Liu, N.: Cost-sensitive boosted tree for loan evaluation in peer-to-peer lending. Electr. Commer. Res. Appl. 24, 30–49 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Xia, Y.F., Liu, C.Z., Li, Y.Y., Liu, N.N.: A boosted decision tree approach using Bayesian hyper-parameter optimization for credit scoring. Expert Syst. Appl. 78, 225–241 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Abelian, J., Castellano, J.G.: A comparative study on base classifiers in ensemble methods for credit scoring. Expert Syst. Appl. 73, 1–10 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sivakumar, S., Selvaraj, R.: Predictive modeling of students performance through the enhanced decision tree. Adv. Electr. Commun. Comput. 443, 21–36 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pai, P.-F., Chen, C.-T., Hung, Y.-M., Hung, W.-Z., Chang, Y.-C.: A group decision classifier with particle swarm optimization and decision tree for analyzing achievements in mathematics and science. Neural Comput. Appl. 25(7–8), 2011–2023 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Luo, L., Zhang, X., Peng, H., Lv, W., Zhang, Y.: A new pruning method for decision tree based on structural risk of leaf node. Neural Comput. Appl. 22(1), 17–26 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Finance Engineering, School of ManagementJinan UniversityGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Guangdong Emergency Technology Research Center of Risk Evaluation and Prewarning on Public Network SecurityGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations