Advertisement

Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Planning Epilepsy Surgery

  • Pantelis Lioumis
  • Jyrki P. Mäkelä
Chapter

Abstract

Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) is increasingly used for noninvasive functional mapping of eloquent cortical areas in preoperative evaluation for brain surgery. Reliability of nTMS has been studied in healthy populations. Here we describe the methods and protocols for nTMS mapping of motor- and language-related cortical areas and describe results of nTMS in patients going through work-ups for epilepsy surgery. Clinical evidence indicates that nTMS mapping is a safe and useful tool in planning epilepsy surgery.

Keywords

Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) Electrical cortical stimulation (ECS) Intractable epilepsy surgery Motor cortex localization Language cortical localization Noninvasive functional mapping Presurgical evaluation 

References

  1. 1.
    Barker AT, Jalinous R, Freeston IL. Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. Lancet. 1985;1:1106–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ilmoniemi RJ, Ruohonen J, Karhu J. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a new tool for functional imaging of the brain. J Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 1999;27:241–84.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Matthews PB. The effect of firing on the excitability of a model motoneurone and its implications for cortical stimulation. J Physiol. 1999;518:867–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gil-Robles S, Duffau H. Surgical management of World Health Organization grade II gliomas in eloquent areas: the necessity of preserving a margin around functional structures. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;28:E8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pouratian N, Bookheimer SY. The reliability of neuroanatomy as a predictor of eloquence: a review. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;28:E3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kombos T, Süss O. Neurophysiological basis of direct cortical stimulation and applied neuroanatomy of the motor cortex: a review. Neurosurg Focus. 2009;27:E3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lesser RP, Lüders H, Klem G, Dinner DS, Morris HH, Hahn JF, Wyllie EJ. Extraoperative cortical functional localization in patients with epilepsy. Clin Neurophysiol. 1987;4:27–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hamer HM, Morris HH, Mascha EJ, Karafa MT, Bingaman WE, Bej MD, et al. Complications of invasive video-EEG monitoring with subdural grid electrodes. Neurology. 2002;58:97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Papanicolaou AC, Rezaie R, Narayana S, Choudhri AF, Wheless JW, Castillo EM, et al. Is it time to replace the Wada test and put awake craniotomy to sleep? Epilepsia. 2014;55:629–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blume WT, Jones DC, Pathak P. Properties of after-discharges from cortical electrical stimulation in focal epilepsies. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;115:982–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tharin S, Golby A. Functional brain mapping and its applications to neurosurgery. Neurosurgery. 2007;60:185–201; discussion 201–2PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Corina DP, Loudermilk BC, Detwiler L, Martin RF, Brinkley JF, Ojemann G. Analysis of naming errors during cortical stimulation mapping: implications for models of language representation. Brain Lang. 2010;115:101–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sanai N, Mirzadeh Z, Berger MS. Functional outcome after language mapping for glioma resection. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:18–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Duffau H. Awake surgery for nonlanguage mapping. Neurosurgery. 2010;66:523–8; discussion 528–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wada J, Rasmussen TJ. Intracarotid injection of sodium amytal for the lateralization of cerebral speech dominance. 1960. Neurosurg. 2007;106:1117–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baxendale S. The Wada test. Curr Opin Neurol. 2009;22:185–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Majchrzak K, Bobek-Billewicz B, Tymowski M, Adamczyk P, Majchrzak H, Ladziński P. Surgical treatment of insular tumours with tractography, functional magnetic resonance imaging, transcranial electrical stimulation and direct subcortical stimulation support. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2011;45:351–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mäkelä JP, Forss N, Jääskeläinen J, Kirveskari E, Korvenoja A, Paetau R. Magnetoencephalography in neurosurgery. Neurosurgery. 2006;59:493–510; discussion 510–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rutten GJ, Ramsey NF. The role of functional magnetic resonance imaging in brain surgery. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;28:E4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Willems PW, van der Sprenkel JW, Tulleken CA, Viergever MA, Taphoorn MJ. Neuronavigation and surgery of intracerebral tumours. J Neurol. 2006;253:1123–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Petrovich Brennan NM, Whalen S, de Morales Branco D, O’Shea JP, Norton IH, Golby AJ. Object naming is a more sensitive measure of speech localization than number counting: converging evidence from direct cortical stimulation and fMRI. NeuroImage. 2007;37:S100–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Friederici AD. Pathways to language: fiber tracts in the human brain. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009;13:175–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Weiller C, Bormann T, Saur D, Musso M, Rijntjes M. How the ventral pathway got lost: and what its recovery might mean. Brain Lang. 2011;118:29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Inoue T, Shimizu H, Nakasato N, Kumabe T, Yoshimoto T. Accuracy and limitation of functional magnetic resonance imaging for identification of the central sulcus: comparison with magnetoencephalography in patients with brain tumors. NeuroImage. 1999;10:738–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Korvenoja A, Kirveskari E, Aronen HJ, Avikainen S, Brander A, Huttunen J, et al. Sensorimotor cortex localization: comparison of magnetoencephalography, functional MR imaging, and intraoperative cortical mapping. Radiology. 2006;241:213–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kamada K, Takeuchi F, Kuriki S, Todo T, Morita A, Sawamura Y. Dissociated expressive and receptive language functions on magnetoencephalography, functional magnetic resonance imaging, and amobarbital studies. Case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg. 2006;104:598–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shiraishi H. Source localization in magnetoencephalography to identify epileptogenic foci. Brain and Development. 2011;33:276–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Forster MT, Hattingen E, Senft C, Gasser T, Seifert V, Szelényi A. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional magnetic resonance imaging: advanced adjuncts in preoperative planning for central region tumors. Neurosurgery. 2011;68:1317–24; discussion 1324–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Picht T, Schmidt S, Brandt S, Frey D, Hannula H, Neuvonen T, et al. Preoperative functional mapping for rolandic brain tumor surgery: comparison of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation to direct cortical stimulation. Neurosurgery. 2011;69:581–8; discussion, 588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vitikainen AM, Lioumis P, Paetau R, Salli E, Komssi S, Metsähonkala L, et al. Combined use of non-invasive techniques for improved functional localization for a selected group of epilepsy surgery candidates. NeuroImage. 2009;45:342–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Säisänen L, Könönen M, Julkunen P, Määttä S, Vanninen R, Immonen A, et al. Non-invasive preoperative localization of primary motor cortex in epilepsy surgery by navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation. Epilepsy Res. 2010;92:134–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vitikainen AM, Salli E, Lioumis P, Mäkelä JP, Metsähonkala L. Applicability of nTMS in locating the motor cortical representation areas in patients with epilepsy. Acta Neurochir. 2013;155:507–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Krings T, Buchbinder BR, Butler WE, Chiappa KH, Jiang HJ, Rosen BR, Cosgrove GR. Stereotactic transcranial magnetic stimulation: correlation with direct electrical cortical stimulation. Neurosurgery. 1997;41:1319–25; discussion, 1325–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Krieg SM, Shiban E, Buchmann N, Gempt J, Foerschler A, Meyer B, et al. Utility of presurgical navigated transcranial magnetic brain stimulation for the resection of tumors in eloquent motor areas. Neurosurg. 2012;116:994–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Picht T, Schulz J, Hanna M, Schmidt S, Suess O, Vajkoczy P. Assessment of the influence of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation on surgical planning for tumors in or near the motor cortex. Neurosurgery. 2012;70:1248–56; discussion, 1256–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pascual-Leone A, Gates JR, Dhuna A. Induction of speech arrest and counting errors with rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology. 1991;41:697–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Devlin JT, Watkins KE. Stimulating language: insights from TMS. Brain. 2007;130:610–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lioumis P, Zhdanov A, Mäkelä N, Lehtinen H, Wilenius J, Neuvonen T, et al. A novel approach for documenting naming errors induced by navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurosci Methods. 2012;204:349–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Picht T, Krieg SM, Sollmann N, Rösler J, Niraula B, Neuvonen T, et al. A comparison of language mapping by preoperative navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and direct cortical stimulation during awake surgery. Neurosurgery. 2013;72:808–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tarapore PE, Findlay AM, Honma SM, Mizuiri D, Houde JF, Berger MS, et al. Language mapping with navigated repetitive TMS: proof of technique and validation. NeuroImage. 2013;82:260–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ille S, Sollmann N, Hauck T, Maurer S, Tanigawa N, Obermueller T, et al. Combined noninvasive language mapping by navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional MRI and its comparison with direct cortical stimulation. J Neurosurg. 2015;123:212–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Krieg S, Lioumis P, Makelä JP, Wilenius J, Karhu J, Hannula H, et al. Current protocol for motor and language mapping by navigated TMS in patients and healthy volunteers; workshop report. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017;159:1187–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ruohonen J, Karhu J. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurophysiol Clin. 2010;40:7–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mäkelä T, Vitikainen AM, Laakso A, Mäkelä JP. Integrating nTMS data into a radiology picture archiving system. J Digit Imaging. 2015;28:428–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Brodeur MB, Dionne-Dostie E, Montreuil T, Lepage M. The Bank of Standardized Stimuli (BOSS), a new set of 480 normative photos of objects to be used as visual stimuli in cognitive research. PLoS One. 2010;5:e10773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Vitikainen AM, Mäkelä E, Lioumis P, Jousmäki V, Mäkelä JP. Accelerometer-based automatic voice onset detection in speech mapping with navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurosci Methods. 2015;253:70–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Vitikainen AM. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation in preoperative functional mapping in patients with epilepsy, University of Helsinki. University of Helsinki, report series in physics, HU-P-D235 (doctoral dissertation). In:Available from; 2016. https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/160259.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Picht T, Mularski S, Kuehn B, Vajkoczy P, Kombos T, Suess O. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation for preoperative functional diagnostics in brain tumor surgery. Neurosurgery. 2009;65:93–8; discussion 98–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Mäkelä JP, Vitikainen AM, Lioumis P, Paetau R, Ahtola E, Kuusela L, et al. Functional plasticity of the motor cortical structures demonstrated by navigated TMS in two patients with epilepsy. Brain Stimul. 2013;6:286–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Schmidt S, Holst E, Irlbacher K, Oltmanns F, Merschhemke M, Brandt SA. A case of pathological excitability located with navigated-TMS: presurgical evaluation of focal neocortical epilepsy. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2010;28:379–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Picht T. Current and potential utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the diagnostics before brain tumor surgery. CNS Oncol. 2014;3:299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Babajani-Feremi A, Narayana S, Rezaie R, Choudhri AF, Fulton SP, Boop FA, et al. Language mapping using high gamma electrocorticography, fMRI, and TMS versus electrocortical stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016;127:1822–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Danner N, Julkunen P, Hypponen J, Niskanen E, Saisanen L, Kononen M, et al. Alterations of motor cortical excitability and anatomy in Unverricht-Lundborg disease. Mov Disord. 2013;28:1860–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;120:2008–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Krishnan C, Santos L, Peterson MD, Ehinger M. Safety of noninvasive brain stimulation in children and adolescents. Brain Stimul. 2015;8:76–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Henri Lehtinen, Jyrki P. Mäkelä, Teemu Mäkelä, Pantelis Lioumis, Liisa Metsähonkala, Laura Hokkanen, Juha Wilenius, Eija Gaily, (2018) Language mapping with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation in pediatric and adult patients undergoing epilepsy surgery: Comparison with extraoperative direct cortical stimulation. Epilepsia Open 3(2):224–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pantelis Lioumis
    • 1
  • Jyrki P. Mäkelä
    • 2
  1. 1.Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.BioMag Laboratory, HUS Medical Imaging Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University HospitalHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations