Biofuel Production from Carbon Dioxide Gas in Polluted Areas

  • Delia Teresa SponzaEmail author
  • Cansu Vural
  • Gokce Güney
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)


Although carbon dioxide (CO2) in the air is at a low level (between 0 and 0.03%), the concentration of it is significantly higher in industrial regions. The CO2 concentration in the atmosphere increases 2–3 ppm every year because of the burning of fossil fuels. Global studies have focused on reducing the carbon dioxide level to the minimum limit (450 ppm) by reducing CO2 emissions 50–80% by the year 2050. In this study, in order to minimize the CO2 levels in the Aliağa and Atatürk industrial districts in Izmir, Turkey, S. elongatus from cyanobacteria were isolated from the Gölcük Lake in Ödemiş, Izmir, and were used to produce 1-butanol from CO2 via photosynthesis as a fuel source, instead of gasoline, for cars. The maximum 1-butanol concentration produced was 79 mg/L, and the 1-butanolproduced/CO2utilized efficiency was 87.6% in the S. elongatus species isolated from the Gölcük Lake at a temperature of 30 °C, at 60 W light intensity, at pH = 7.1, at 120 mV redox potential, at a flow rate of 0.083 m3/min using CO2 from the Aliağa industrial region, and at 0.5 mg/L dissolved O2 concentration. The maximum 1-butanol concentration produced was 59 mg/L, and the 1-butanolproduced/CO2utilized efficiency was 67.9% in the Atatürk industrial district due to low levels of polluted air in this region. In order to produce 10.000 m3 1-butanol from 1000 g/L CO2, the cost was calculated as 0.13 euro, while the addition of plasmid increased the cost to 0.66 euro to produce 10.000 m3 1-butanol.


1-Butanol CO2 S. elongatus Cyanobacteria Biofuel 



This study was prepared in the scope of master of science studies in biotechnology and at the same time it was supported by the DEU Scientific Research Foundation (2014.KB.FEN.035) in Dokuz Eylul University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences. In addition, the author acknowledges The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBİTAK) for the financial support to the project numbered 114Y72.


  1. 1.
    Microbe Wiki (2014) Title of Synechococcus. Accessed 15 Apr 2014
  2. 2.
    Armbrust EV, Bowen JD, Olson RJ, Chisholm SW (1989) Effect of light on the cell cycle of a marine synechococcus strain. Appl Environ Microbiol 55(2):425–432Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Atsumi S, Hanai T, Liao JC (2008) Non-fermentative pathways for synthesis of branched-chain higher alcohols as biofuels. Nature 451:86–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Devaki B, Watanabe N, Ogawa T (1999) National center for biotechnology information. U.S. National Library of Medicine 96(6):3188–3319Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Binder BJ, Chisholm SW (1995) Cell cycle regulation in marine synechococcus sp. strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 61(2):708–717Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boynton ZL, Bennet GN, Rudolph FB (1996) Cloning sequencing and expression of clustered genes encoding beta-hydroxybutyryl-coenzyme A (CoA) dehydrogenase, crotonase and butyryl-CoA dehydrogenase from clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824. J Bacteriol 178(11):3015–3024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Denhez F (2007) Global climate change and its effects in Turkey. Turkey, p 56–58Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Elliott JA (2010) The seasonal sensitivity of cyanobacteria and other phytoplankton to changes in flushing rate and water temperature. Glob Chang Biol 16:864–876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Flores E, Frías JE, Rubio LM, Herrero A (2005) Photosynthetic nitrate assimilation in cyanobacteria: a review. Photosynth Res 83:117–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fu F, Mark E, Zhang Y, Feng Y, Hulchins DA (2007) Effects of increased temperature and CO2 on photosynthesis, growth and elemental ratios in marine synechococcus and prochlorococcus (cyanobacteria). J Phycol 443(3):485–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hansen JL, Nazaernko R, Ruedy M, Sato M, Willis J, Del Genio A, Koch D, Lacis A, Lo K, Menon S, Novakov T, Perlwitz J, Russell G, Schmidt GA, Tausnev N (2005) Earth’s energy imbalance: confirmation and implications. Science 308:1431–1435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kuan D, Duff S, Posarac D, Bi X (2015) Growth optimization of synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942 in lab flasks and 2-D photobioreactor. Can J Chem Eng 93:640–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kajiwara S, Yamada H, Ohkuni N (1997) Design of the bioreactor for carbon dioxide fixation by synechococcus PCC 7942. Energy Convers Manag 38:529–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kamennaya NA, Anton FP (2011) Characterization of cyanate metabolism in marine synechococcus and prochlorococcus sp. Appl Environ Microbiol 77(1):291–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lan EI, Liao JC (2011) Metabolic engineering of cyanobacteria for 1-butanol production from carbon dioxide. Metab Eng 13:353–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lan EI, Liao JC (2012) ATP drives direct photosynthetic production of 1-butanol in cyanobacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109(16):6018–6023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu H, Robert R, Laws E, Landry M, Camphell L (1999) Cell cycle and physiological characteristics of synechococcus (WH7803) in chemostat culture. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 189:17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Luque I, Flores E, Herrero A (1993) Nitrite reductase gene from synechococcus sp. PCC 7942: homology between cyanobacterial and higher-plant nitrite reductases. Plant Mol Biol 21:1201–1205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Maeda S, Kawaguchi Y, Ohe TA, Omata T (1998) Cis-acting sequences required for NtcB-dependent, nitrite-responsive positive regulation of the nitrate assimilation operon in the cyanobacterium synechococcus sp. strain PCC 7942. J Bacteriol 180:4080–4088Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Standard methods for water and wastewater engineering (2012) APHA – AWWA, USAGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Murray R, Badger T, Andrews J (1982) Photosynthesis and inorganic carbon usage by the marine cyanobacterium synechococcus sp. Plant Physiol 70(2):517–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
    Palenik B, Brahamsha B, Larimer FW (2003) The genome of a motile marine synechococcus. Nature 424:1037–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Parmar A, Singh NK, Pandey A, Gnansounou E, Madamwar D (2011) Cyanobacteria and microalgae: a positive prospect for biofuels. Bioresour Technol 102:10163–10172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Prince RC, Khsheegi HS (2005) The photobiological production of hydrogen: potential efficiency and effectiveness as a renewable fuel. Crit Rev Microbiol 31(1):19–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yan R, Zhang Z, Zhu D (2009) Carbon and energetic metabolism of synechococcus sp. PCC7942 under photoautotrophic conditions. Springer Science and Business Media 25(9):1352–1359Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rippka R, Deruelles J, Waterbury JB, Herdman M, Stainer RY (1979) Generic assignments, strain histories and properties of pure cultures of cyanobacteria. J Gen Microbiol 111:1–61Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Romo S, Soria J, Fernandez F, Ouahid Y, Sola A (2013) Water residence time and the dynamics of toxic cyanobacteria. Freshw Biol 58:513–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pope D (1975) Effects of light intensity, oxygen concentration, and carbon dioxide concentration on photosynthesis in algae. Microb Ecol 2(1):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Aravinthan DT, Jennifer DP, Thomas SR (2001) Envelope structure of synechococcus sp. WH8113, a nonflagellated swimming cyanobacterium. BMC Microbiol 1:4. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Shen CR, Lan EI, Dekishima Y, Baez A, Cho KM, Liao JC (2011) Driving forces enable high-titer anaerobic 1-butanol synthesis in escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:2905–2915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Snyder DS, Brahamsha B, Azadi P, Palenik B (2009) Structure of compositionally simple lipopolysaccharide from marine synechococcus. J Bacteriol 191(17):5499–5509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Riming Y, Zhu D, Zhang Z (2012) Carbon metabolism and energy conversion of synechococcus sp. PCC 7942 under mixotrophic conditions: comparison with photoautotrophic condition. J Appl Phycol 24(4):657–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Delia Teresa Sponza
    • 1
    Email author
  • Cansu Vural
    • 2
  • Gokce Güney
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental EngineeringDokuz Eylul UniversityIzmirTurkey
  2. 2.Fundamental and Industrial Microbiology DepartmentEge UniversityIzmirTurkey

Personalised recommendations