Advertisement

Conclusion

  • Ellen McCabe
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Education book series (BRIEFSEDUCAT)

Abstract

This chapter outlines the theoretical and policy implications of the study’s findings, how they may inform future research in this area and meaningful curricular reform. While technology has a significant role to play in such reform, the best learning does not occur between student and interface, but through the relationships and interactions of students and teachers as well as among students themselves. Thus digital interventions within the proposed reformed system must depart from passive, broadcast interaction, to the facilitation and augmentation of such relationships. Moreover, this section will outline potential possibilities with regard to how such reform might be implemented in actual, educational activities and processes, primarily in the form of digital storytelling. As such, it will not only excavate and analyse the primary theoretical values underlying deeply embedded concepts surrounding education but also detail how such concepts manifest in the relationships and interactions of the classroom environment.

Keywords

Digital learning interventions Digital storytelling Standardised testing Independent assessment Empowering teachers Peer learning Collaborative learning Shakespeare and the leaving cert Macbeth at second level Educational reform Curricular reform Educational policy Learning environment design Digital literacy Multiliteracies Multimedia learning Passive learning Rote learning Holistic education Critical thinking Shakespeare at second level Digital arts Classroom based assessment Continuous assessment Media manipulation 

Bibliography

  1. Dewey, J. (1998). Experience and education. West Lafayette, IN: Kappa Delta Pi.Google Scholar
  2. Duncan, B. (1989). Media literacy: Resource guide. Toronto, ON: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.Google Scholar
  3. Feeney, A. (2017). SEC Guidance re requirements for the completion of assessment tasks (p. 1). Athlone: State Examinations Commission. Retrieved May 9, 2018, from https://www.examinations.ie/misc-doc/BI-EX-27838668.pdf.Google Scholar
  4. Ferrarotti, F. (1981). On the autonomy of the biographical method. In D. Bertaux (Ed.), Biography and society: The life history approach in the social sciences. Sage studies in international sociology (pp. 19–27). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  5. Joint committee on education and skills: Third level curricular reform. (2011). Houses of the Oireachtas. Retrieved October 10, 2014, from http://debates.oireachtas.ie/EDJ/2010/12/02/00004.asp.
  6. Langer, E. (2010). Mindfulness and mindlessness. In J. O’Brien (Ed.), The production of reality: Essays and readings on social interaction (pp. 82–87). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  7. Metcalfe, R. M., Paradis, J., & Pettitt, T. (2010). The Gutenberg parenthesis: Oral tradition and digital technologies. MIT Communications Forum.Google Scholar
  8. Ong, W. J. (2013). Orality and literacy. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Robinson, K. (2011). Out of our minds: learning to be creative. London: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  10. Wesch, M. (2014). From knowledgable to knowledge-able: Learning in new media environments. Academic Commons. Retrieved July 1, 2014, from http://www.academiccommons.org/commons/essay/knowledgable-knowledge-able.

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ellen McCabe
    • 1
  1. 1.Huston School of Film & Digital MediaNational University of Ireland, GalwayGalwayIreland

Personalised recommendations