Advertisement

A New Procedure for Construction Metro Station in Non-cemented Soil: A Numerical Investigation

  • Mahsa Firouzi
  • Hamed Bayesteh
Conference paper
Part of the Sustainable Civil Infrastructures book series (SUCI)

Abstract

According to the development of societies and increase of population, the use of underground spaces has been developed in the past decades. The high cost of construction of the urban space such as metro stations, leads to increase the demand for tunnels in big urban. Thus, an economical method should select to build these structures. One of the popular and flexible underground construction methods is New Austrian Tunneling Method (NATM). When NATM is implemented in big cross section, face is divided in to temporary section. This method includes Central Diaphragm (CD) method, Side wall Drift (SD) method, Pile-Beam-Arch method and etc. In the non-cemented soil, the settlements due to the excavation sequences maybe leads to damage to nearby structures. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the effective factor of controlling tunnel-induced settlements and change the construction stages during excavation. A lot of numerical studies have been done on NATM in urban areas that often deal with the simulation of tunnels and small sections. In this paper, a number of Finite Difference Method analyses were conducted to evaluate the effects of different patterns for advancing the tunnel face on the settlement in NATM station construction in the non-cementation soil. Constructing a station is considered as a big section. Induced displacements are empirically controlled by adjusting the speed of excavation, installing support and partial-face excavation.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thanks the personals of the Metro Company for consulting.

References

  1. Farias, M.M.D., Junior, A.H.M., Assis, A.P.D.: Displacement control in tunnels excavated by the NATM: 3-D numerical simulations. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2003.11.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Hoek, E.: Rock-Support Interaction Analysis for Tunnels in Weak Rock Masses. Rocscience Inc, Canada Google Scholar
  3. Itasca Consulting Group Inc, Sixth Edition (FLAC Version 8.0) February 2016, Minneapolis, MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  4. Karakus, M., c, R.J.: Effects of different tunnel face advance excavation on the settlement by FEM. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(03)00068-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kolymbas, D.: Tunnelling and Tunnel Mechanics. Springer, Berlin (2003). ISBN: 10 3-540-25196-0Google Scholar
  6. Sharifzadeh, M., Kolivand, F., Ghorbani, M., Yasrobi, S.: Design of sequential excavation method for large span urban tunnels in soft ground – Niayesh tunnel. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2013.01.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Vlachopoulos, N., Diederichs, M.S.: Improved longitudinal displacement profiles for convergence confinement analysis of deep tunnels. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-009-0176-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Yu, C.W., Chern, J.C. Expert system for D&B tunnel construction. Undergr. Space (2007). ISBN: 978-0-415-40807-3Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of QomQomIran

Personalised recommendations