Advertisement

Use of Falling Weight Deflectometer for Airport Pavements

Conference paper
Part of the Sustainable Civil Infrastructures book series (SUCI)

Abstract

The Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) provides a rapid and cost-effective means of measuring the response of pavements to a dynamic load. Its broad application has allowed the development of significant guidance regarding empirical interpretation of FWD results. Software has also been developed allowing the estimation of layer modulus, including the subgrade, and in some cases the calculation of a theoretical strength rating for aircraft pavement structures. However, many practitioners question the reasonableness of the moduli calculated and the reliably of the resulting airport pavement strength rating. This paper reviews the use of FWD in airport pavement strength evaluations and assesses its appropriateness for particular situations and tasks. Example projects are considered and data analysed to determine the benefits and limitations. Further work is recommended to better understand the impact of variability in FWD results on inferred layer modulus and airport pavement strength rating.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The provision of FWD data and advice regarding testing protocols provided by Jim Johnson-Clarke or ARRB (Melbourne, Australia) is gratefully appreciated.

References

  1. AASHTO: Guide for Design of Pavement Structure, Appendix J: Analysis Unit Delineation by Cumulative Differences. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Official, Washington, District of Columbia, USA (1993)Google Scholar
  2. Ameri, M., Yavari, N., Scullion, T.: Comparison of static and dynamic backcalculation of flexible pavement layer moduli, using four software programs. Asian Journal of Applied Sciences 2(3), 197–210 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Austroads.: Pavement Deflection Measurement with a Falling Weight Deflectometer. Austroads Test Method AG:AM/T006, 31 Mar 2011Google Scholar
  4. Bandara, N., Rowe, G.M., Sharrock, M.J., Nickerson, C.R.: Seasonal variation of subgrade modulus in different subgrade soils for pavement rehabilitation for non freeze-thaw cycles. In: Applications of Advanced Technology in Transportation, pp. 473–480 (2002)Google Scholar
  5. Celaya, M., Nazarian, S.: ‘Field evaluation of NDT devices for delamination detection of HMA airport pavements. In: FAA Worldwide Airport Technology Transfer Conference, Galloway, New Jersey, USA, 5–7 Aug 2014Google Scholar
  6. Dynatest 2017, ELMOD 6 Quick Start Manual, Dynatest InternationalGoogle Scholar
  7. FAA.: Use of Nondestructive Testing in Pavement Evaluations, Advisory Circular 150/5370-11B, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, District of Columbia, USA, 30 Sept 2011Google Scholar
  8. Gendreau, M., Soriano, P.: Airport pavement management systems: an appraisal of existing methodologies. Transp. Res. 32(3), 197–214 (1998)Google Scholar
  9. ICAO: Aerodrome Design Manager: Part 3, ICAO 9157, 2nd edn. International Civil Aviation Organization, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, January (1983)Google Scholar
  10. Kang, Y.V.: Multifrequency back-calculation of pavement layer moduli. J. Transp. Eng. 124(1), 73–81 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rocha, S., Tandon, V., Nazarian, S.: Falling weight deflectometer fleet. Road Mat. Pavement Des. 5(2), 215–238 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. Thomas, F.: Generating homogenous road sections based on surface measurements: available methods. In: 2nd European Pavement and Asset Management Conference, Berlin, Germany, 21–23 Mar 2004Google Scholar
  13. TRB: Falling Weight Deflectometer Usage, NCHRP Synthesis 381. Transportation Research Board, Washington, District of Columbia, USA (2008)Google Scholar
  14. Vuong, B.: A new linear elastic back-calculation model for back-calculating layer moduli at fixed Poisson’s ratio. Aust. Road Res. 19(1), 17–28 (1989)Google Scholar
  15. White, G.: A sensitivity analysis of APSDS, an Australian mechanistic design tool for flexible aircraft pavement thickness determination. In: First European Aircraft Pavement Workshop, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 11–12 May 2005Google Scholar
  16. White, G.: Expedient runway upgrade technologies. In: 10th International Conference on the Bearing Capacity of Roads, Railways and Airfields, Athens, Greece, 28–30 June 2017Google Scholar
  17. Zaniewski, J.: Unified Methodology for Airport Pavement Analysis and Design, Technical Report DOT/FAA/RD-91/15, I. Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, District of Columbia, USA, June (1991)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Airport Pavement Research ProgramUniversity of the Sunshine CoastSippy DownsAustralia

Personalised recommendations