Advertisement

The Gendered Dynamics of the Recruitment of Screenwriters

  • Natalie Wreyford
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter provides a unique inside view of the informal and socialized recruitment processes of the UK film labour market and demonstrates the precise mechanisms that lead to gender inequality. The need to be constantly ‘networking’ is an accepted part of film work, but how exactly does it disadvantage women? This chapter also examines the way employers justify their subjective decisions about hiring certain personnel as risk reduction strategies, thereby excusing any need to address inequality of access to screenwriting work. In analysing the importance of the idea of ‘trust’ to employers of screenwriters, it also demonstrates how their talk suggests they are actually more likely to rely on homophily to feel secure about their choices and how this has a significant impact on women.

References

  1. Banks, Mark. 2007. The politics of cultural work. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bielby, Denise D. 2009. Gender inequality in culture industries: Women and men writers in film and television. Sociologie du travail 51 (2): 237–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bielby, William T., and James N. Baron. 1984. A woman’s place is with other women: Sex segregation within organizations. In Sex segregation in the workplace: Trends, explanations, remedies, ed. Barbara F. Reskin, 27–55. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bielby, Denise D., and William T. Bielby. 1996. Women and men in film: Gender inequality among writers in a culture industry. Gender & Society 10 (3): 248–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bielby, William T., and Denise D. Bielby. 1999. Organizational mediation of project-based labor markets: Talent agencies and the careers of screenwriters. American Sociological Review 64: 64–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blair, Helen. 2000. Active networking: The role of networks and hierarchy in the operation of the labour market in the British film industry. Management Research News 23: 20–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ———. 2001. ‘You’re only as good as your last job’: The labour process and labour market in the British film industry. Work, Employment and Society 15 (1): 149–169.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 2009. Active networking: Action, social structure and the process of networking. In Creative labour: Working in the creative industries, ed. Alan McKinley and Chris Smith, 116–134. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blair, Helen, Susan Grey, and Keith Randle. 2001. Working in film–employment in a project based industry. Personnel Review 30 (2): 170–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blau, Peter M. 1994. Structural contexts of opportunities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bourdieu, Pierre, and Loïc Wacquant. 1992. An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Burt, Ronald S. 2002. The social capital of structural holes. In The new economic sociology: Developments in an emerging field, ed. Mauro F. Guillén, Randall Collins, Paula England, and Marshall Meyer eds, 148–190. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  14. Campbell, Karen E. 1988. Gender differences in job-related networks. Work and Occupations 15 (2): 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Christopherson, Susan. 2009. Working in the creative economy: Risk, adaptation, and the persistence of exclusionary networks. In Creative labour: Working in the creative industries, ed. Alan McKinlay and Chris Smith, 72–90. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cobb, Shelley, Linda Ruth Williams and Natalie Wreyford. 2016. Calling the Shots: Women working in key roles on UK films in production during 2015. https://www.southampton.ac.uk/cswf/project/number_tracking.page. Accessed 26 Mar 2018.
  17. Creative Skillset. 2010. Women in the creative media industries. http://www.ewawomen.com/uploads/files/surveyskillset.pdf. Accessed 14 Apr 2018.
  18. Cromie, Stan, and Sue Birley. 1992. Networking by female business owners in Northern Ireland. Journal of Business Venturing 7 (3): 237–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fang, Lily. 2015. Your Rolodex matters, but by how much depends on your gender. Knowledge Instead. https://knowledge.insead.edu/career/your-rolodex-matters-but-by-how-much-depends-on-your-gender-3862. Accessed 14 Apr 2018.
  20. Faulkner, Robert R., and Andy B. Anderson. 1987. Short-term projects and emergent careers: Evidence from Hollywood. American Journal of Sociology 92 (4): 879–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Franks, Suzanne. 1999. Having none of it: Women, men and the future of work. London: Granta.Google Scholar
  22. Gill, Rosalind. 2002. Cool, creative and egalitarian? Exploring gender in project-based new media work in Europe. Information, Communication & Society 5 (1): 70–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. ———. 2014. Unspeakable inequalities: Post feminism, entrepreneurial subjectivity, and the repudiation of sexism among cultural workers. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 21 (4): 509–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gill, Rosalind, and Andy Pratt. 2008. In the social factory? Immaterial labour, precariousness and cultural work. Theory, Culture & Society 25 (7–8): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goldin, Claudia, and Cecilia Rouse. 2000. Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of “blind” auditions on female musicians. American Economic Review 90 (4): 715–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goldman, William. 1983. Adventures in the screen trade. New York: Grand Central Publishing.Google Scholar
  27. Granovetter, Mark. 1995. Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Grugulis, Irena, and Dimitrinka Stoyanova. 2012. Social capital and networks in film and TV: Jobs for the boys? Organization Studies 33 (10): 1311–1331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hesmondhalgh, David. 2007. The cultural industries. Los Angeles: SAGE.Google Scholar
  30. Hochschild, Arlie, and Anne Machung. 1989. The second shift: Working families and the revolution at home. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  31. Ibarra, Herminia. 1992. Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly 37: 422–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. ———. 1993. Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review 18 (1): 56–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jones, Candace. 1996. Careers in project networks: The case of the film industry. In The boundaryless career: A new employment principle for a new organizational era, ed. Michael B. Arthur and Denise M. Rousseau, 58–75. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. 1977. Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  35. Kreager, Alexis, and Stephen Follows. 2018. Gender inequality and screenwriters. A study of the impact of gender on equality of opportunity for screenwriters and key creatives in the UK film and television industries. The Writers Guild of Great Britain. https://writersguild.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Gender-Inequality-and-Screenwriters.pdf. Accessed 13 June 2018.
  36. Macdonald, Ian W. 2010. So it’s not surprising I’m neurotic the screenwriter and the screen idea work group. Journal of Screenwriting 1 (1): 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mayer, Roger C., James H. Davis, and F. David Schoorman. 1995. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review 20 (3): 709–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McGuire, Gail M. 2000. Gender, race, ethnicity, and networks: The factors affecting the status of employees’ network members. Work and Occupations 27 (4): 501–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. ———. 2002. Gender, race, and the shadow structure: A study of informal networks and inequality in a work organization. Gender & Society 16 (3): 303–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McKinlay, Alan, and Chris Smith, eds. 2009. Creative labour: Working in the creative industries. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  41. Randle, Keith, and Nigel Culkin. 2009. Getting in and getting on in Hollywood: freelance careers in an uncertain industry. In Creative Labour, ed. Alan McKinlay, 93–115. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rees, Albert. 1966. Information networks in labor markets. The American Economic Review 56 (1/2): 559–566.Google Scholar
  43. Renzulli, Linda A., Howard Aldrich, and James Moody. 2000. Family matters: Gender, networks, and entrepreneurial outcomes. Social Forces 79 (2): 523–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rivera, Lauren A. 2011. Ivies, extracurriculars, and exclusion: Elite employers’ use of educational credentials. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 29 (1): 71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rogers, Susan. 2007. British Films: who writes British films and how they are recruited. UK Film Council. http://www.bfi.org.uk/sites/bfi.org.uk/files/downloads/uk-film-council-writing-british-films-who-writes-british-films-and-how-they-are-recruited.pdf. Accessed 26 Mar 2018.
  46. Singh, Anita. 2014. BBC staff take ‘unconscious bias’ course to encourage more diverse recruitment. The Telegraph. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/bbc/10794205/BBC-staff-take-unconscious-bias-course-to-encourage-more-diverse-recruitment.html. Accessed 14 Apr 2018.
  47. Steele, David. 2013. Succes de plume? Female Screenwriters and Directors of UK Films, 2010–2012. http://www.bfi.org.uk/sites/bfi.org.uk/files/downloads/bfi-report-on-female-writers-and-directors-of-uk-films-2013-11.pdf. Accessed 17 Apr 2018.
  48. Timewise. 2017. Timewise Flexible Jobs Index 2017. https://timewise.co.uk/what-we-do/research/flexible-jobs-index-2017/. Accessed 14 Apr 2018.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Natalie Wreyford
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations