Advertisement

Copyright Legacy and Developing Countries: Important Lessons for Nigeria’s Emerging Copyright Reform

  • Adebambo Adewopo
Chapter

Abstract

For about half a century of development policy and scholarship, the debate on the relationship between copyright and development with particular reference to developing countries has continued to renew itself over and over. The intensity of that debate underscores the pervasive role of copyright as an important intellectual property (IP) in developing countries and one without which the contemporary development narratives are incomplete. The narratives construct complex and dynamic issue linkages in the global copyright and development frameworks. As a background to the discourse, this chapter introduces IP through the lens of development. It revisits the foundations of copyright from its philosophical, technological and normative premises and as a legacy institution bequeathed by a Western knowledge system to developing countries. The chapter examines the emergence of access to knowledge (A2K) as an important concern for the future role of copyright in developing countries with the focus on Nigeria and its emerging copyright reform. The chapter argues that development in a developing country like Nigeria is undermined where the population is denied access to copyright materials, which can enhance access to education and knowledge that is critically needed for socio-economic and technological development. It concludes that Nigeria’s new Copyright Bill offers a quantum leap to the next copyright dispensation for the new digital environment.

References

  1. Abdel Latif A (2012) The emergence of the AZK movement: reminiscences and reflections of a developing-country delegate in access to knowledge in the age of IP. In: Krikorian G, Kapezynski A (eds) Access to knowledge in the age of IP. Zone Books, New York, p 99Google Scholar
  2. Adewopo A (2012) According to intellectual property: a pro-development vision of the law and the Nigerian intellectual property law and policy reform in the knowledge era. Nigerian Institute of Advanced Legal StudiesGoogle Scholar
  3. Adewopo A (2015) Role of the court in the interpretation and development of intellectual property law: the Nigerian experience. Gravitas Rev Bus Prop Law 6(1):1Google Scholar
  4. AJOL, African Journals Online. Available at http://www.ajol.info/
  5. Benkler Y (1999) Free as the air to common use: first amendment constraints on enclosure of the public domain. N Y Univ Law Rev 74:354Google Scholar
  6. Boyle J (2003) The second enclosure movement and the construction of the public domain. Law Contemp Probs 66:33–74Google Scholar
  7. Boyle J (2004) A manifesto on WIPO and the future of intellectual property. Duke Law Technol Rev 9:1–12Google Scholar
  8. Budapest Open Access Initiative. 2002Google Scholar
  9. Chon M (2007) Intellectual property from below: copyright and capability for education. UC Davis Law Rev 40:803Google Scholar
  10. Cornell University Library, arXiv.org
  11. David P (2004) The end of copyright history. Rev Econ Res Copyright Issues 1(2):5–10Google Scholar
  12. Dele Ogbodo (2015) Nigeria Now Uses 29% of Africa’s Internet Access an Interview with Nigerian Minister of Communication Technology, Mrs. Omobola Johnson (2015) Thisday. http://www.thisdaylive.com/articles/nigeria-now-uses-29-of-africa-s-internet-access/209661/
  13. Draft Copyright Bill 2015 (Nigeria)Google Scholar
  14. Dutfield G, Suthersanen U (2008) Global intellectual property law. Edward Edgar, p 272Google Scholar
  15. Dying for Change Poor People’s experience of health and ill-health, a joint undertaking between WHO and World Bank available at http://www.who.int/hdp/publications/dying_change.pdf
  16. Ghidini G (2011) On the impact of TRIPs on least developed countries: a tale of double standards. QMJIP 1(1):73–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Halbert DJ (2007) The world intellectual property organisation past, present and future. J Copyright Soc USA 54:253, 262Google Scholar
  18. Harnad S (2012) What is Open Access. http://www.eprints.org/openaccess/. Harnad, Mitteilungen der VÖB
  19. Harnad S et al (2008) The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access. Serial Rev 34(1):36–40Google Scholar
  20. Kaczynski A (2008) The access to knowledge mobilization and the new politics of generally IP. Yale Law J 117:804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kirchmeier F (2006) The right to development – where do we stand? State of debate on the right to development, dialogue on globalisation, Occassional Papers, No 23/July 2006. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  22. Krikovian G, Kapczynski A (2010) Access to knowledge in the age of IP. Zone Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Landes WM, Posner RA (2004) The political economy of intellectual property law, 1–4Google Scholar
  24. Larkin M (2014) The demise of copyright act in the digital Realm: re-engineering delivery models to circumvent copyright liability after Aereo. Columbia J Law Arts 37(3)Google Scholar
  25. Locke J (1690) Second Treatise on Government, s.27, reprinted in Gough J.W (ed) (1966). Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  26. Lunney GS Jr (2001) The death of copyright: digital technology private copying and digital millenium copyright act. Texas A & M Va Law Rev 84:813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. National Universities Commission, LIST OF NIGERIAN UNIVERSITIES AND YEARS FOUNDEDGoogle Scholar
  28. Nimmer D (1995) End of copyright. Vand Law Rev 48:1385Google Scholar
  29. Okedji RL (1999) See also copyright and public welfare in global perspective. Indiana J Glob Leg Stud 7(117):149–150Google Scholar
  30. Okedji RL (2006) The International Copyright System, Limitations Exceptions and Public Interest Consideration for Developing Countries, ICTSD – UNCTAD Project on IPRs and Sustainable Development, Issue Paper No. 15, 8Google Scholar
  31. Okedji RL (2008) IP essentialism and the authority of the firm. Yale Law J Pocket Part 117:274, 277Google Scholar
  32. Okedji RL (2014) Legal innovation in international intellectual property relations: revisiting twenty one years of the TRIPS agreement. Univ Pa J Int Law 36:191Google Scholar
  33. Queensland University of Technology, QUT ePrints. Available at http://eprints.qut.edu.au/
  34. Sen A (1983) Development: which way now? Econ J 93:745–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sen A (1984) Resources, values & development. Basil Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  36. Sen A (1985a) Well being, agency and freedom: the Dewey lectures. J Philos 82(4):169–221Google Scholar
  37. Sen A (1985b) Commodities and capabilities. Elsevier Science Publishers, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  38. Sunder M (2006) IP3. Stanf Law Rev 159(2):257Google Scholar
  39. Treaty to facilitate Access to published works for persons who are blind, visually impaired or otherwise print disabled Adopted by the Diplomatic Conference in Marrakesh, Morocco in 27, June 2013Google Scholar
  40. UN News Centre, Literacy vital for beating poverty and disease and reinforcing stability – UN. Available at http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=39485&Cr=literacy&Cr1#.USQB_h1BP-Y
  41. UN Report (13 June 2013) World population to reach 9.6 billion by 2050. http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=45165#.Uhv1GtJmjTo
  42. UNESCO (2009) Education for all global monitoring report 2009Google Scholar
  43. Vaver D (2000) Intellectual property the state of the art. Law Q Rev 116:621–637Google Scholar
  44. Von Lewinski S (2008) International copyright law and policy. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  45. Wong T, Dutfield G (eds) (2011) Intellectual property and human development, current trends and future scenarios, a publication of public interest intellectual property advisors. Cambridge University Press, p 4Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adebambo Adewopo
    • 1
  1. 1.Nigerian Institute of Advanced Legal StudiesAbujaNigeria

Personalised recommendations