Advertisement

Durability Assessment of Pavement Foundation Materials Treated with a Polymeric-Based Additive

  • Romel Georgees
  • Rayya Hassan
  • Robert Evans
Conference paper
Part of the Sustainable Civil Infrastructures book series (SUCI)

Abstract

Strength and durability characteristics of granular and subgrade pavement materials have been shown to improve using polymer additives. Using such types of additives have shown to lower carbon footprints compared to traditional cementitious additives. This study reports the outcomes of a laboratory investigation to evaluate the use of a polymeric stabilization technique in improving engineering properties of pavement foundation materials. A synthetic polyacrylamide-based additive (PAM) has been used to stabilize three types of soils, commonly used in pavement construction. Repeated load triaxial tests were conducted to assess the stiffness and resistance to permanent deformation characteristics of PAM-treated soils. Simple capillary rise and abrasion tests have also been conducted to assess durability characteristics. The results revealed a significant overall increase in resilient modulus and a remarkable decrease in permanent deformation for the treated samples, depending on soil type. Further, the PAM used herein was shown to enhance the sealing capacity of the soils with the rise of water table, and dramatically improved the abrasion resistance for all the soils tested.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the logistic support of the Earthco projects company, particularly Mr Mark Holding for providing the stabilizer additive for this research.

References

  1. AASHTO: Guide for design of pavement structures. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, AASHTO, Washington, D.C., USA (1993)Google Scholar
  2. AASHTO: Standard method of test for determining the resilient modulus of soils and aggregate materials. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, AASHTO, Washington, D.C. USA (2003)Google Scholar
  3. Andrews, R., Sharp, K.: A protocol for conducting field trials for best value management of unsealed roads. In: 24th ARRB Conference—Building on 50 Years of Road and Transport Research (2010)Google Scholar
  4. AS: Methods of sampling and testing aggregates Method 53: absorption, swell and capillary rise of compacted materials AS1141.53. Standards Australia, Australia (1996)Google Scholar
  5. AS: Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes Method 5.2.1: soil compaction and density tests—determination of the dry density/moisture content relation of a soil using modified compactive effort. AS 1289.5.2.1. Standards Australia, Sydney, Australia (2003)Google Scholar
  6. AS: Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes Method 3.3.1: soil classification tests—calculation of the plasticity index of a soil. AS 1289.3.3.1. Standards Australia, Sydney, Australia (2009)Google Scholar
  7. ASTM: Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system). ASTM D2487. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: American Society for Testing Materials (2011)Google Scholar
  8. Austroads: Determination of permanent deformation and resilient modulus characteristics of unbound granular materials under drained conditions. Commentary to AG:PT/T053. Austroads, Sydney, NSW, Australia (2000)Google Scholar
  9. Austroads: Guide to Pavement Technology Part 2: Pavement Structural Design. Sydney, NSW, Australia (2008)Google Scholar
  10. Camarena, S.: Sustainable Road Maintenance and Construction Utilising New Technologies. International Public Works Conference, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia (2013)Google Scholar
  11. Factbook: Australia. Central Intelligence Agency, In: The world factbook. Available: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/AS.html (2016)
  12. Georgees, R.N., et al.: Effect of the use of a polymeric stabilizing additive on unconfined compressive strength of soils. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board, 200–208 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jones, D.: Development of performance-based tests for nontraditional road additives. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board, 142–153 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Malik, M., et al.: Mobility of polyacrylamide and polysaccharide polymer through soil materials. Soil Technol. 4, 255–263 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Puppala, A., et al.: Permanent deformation characterization of subgrade soils from RLT test. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 11, 274–282 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sampson, L.: Development of the mechanical wet/dry brushing test for the durability testing of stabilized materials. Transportek, CSIR, Pretoria, SA. Confidential Report C/DPVT/3.1 (1988)Google Scholar
  17. Theng, B.: Clay-polymer interactions; summary and perspectives. Clays Clay Miner. 30, 1–10 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Virgil Ping, W., et al.: Measuring resilient modulus of granular materials in flexible pavements. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board, 81–90 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Vorobieff, G., Wilmot, T.: Australian experience on subgrade stabilisation and pavement recycling. In: International Symposium on Subgrade Stabilisation and In Situ Pavement Recycling Using Cement, 1st, Salamanca, Spain (2001)Google Scholar
  20. Wilmot, T.D.: Applications for stabilisation in pavement construction and rehabilitation. In: Malaysian Road Conference, 1st Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (1994)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Swinburne University of TechnologyMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Kirkuk UniversityKirkukIraq

Personalised recommendations