Advertisement

Roadmap to Local Autonomy? Drivers of Variation

  • Andreas Ladner
  • Nicolas Keuffer
  • Harald Baldersheim
  • Nikos Hlepas
  • Pawel Swianiewicz
  • Kristof Steyvers
  • Carmen Navarro
Chapter
Part of the Governance and Public Management book series (GPM)

Abstract

The previous chapters of the book have identified substantial and persistent patterns of variation in terms of local autonomy and its components across the 39 countries covered by the present study. This chapter seeks to explain the variation of local autonomy by trying to identify drivers of variation. Six hypotheses are explored in this regard with the database available. The hypotheses state that local autonomy varies in response to voter preferences, requirements of modernisation, state traditions, path dependency, games of multilevel governance, or citizen trust. State traditions, multilevel governance and citizen trust are the factors that best account for the cross-country variation in local autonomy.

Keywords

Rational preferences Country size Municipal size Modernisation theory Institutional evolution theory Path dependency Multilevel governance Citizen trust Political logic model 

References

  1. Baldersheim, H., & Rose, L. E. (2010). A Comparative Analysis of Territorial Choice in Europe – Conclusions. In H. Baldersheim & L. E. Rose (Eds.), Territorial Choice. The Politics of Boundaries and Borders. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldersheim, H., Haug, A. V., & Øgård, M. (2011). The Rise of the Networking Region. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  3. Bish, R. L., & Ostrom, V. (1973). Understanding Urban Government; Metropolitan Reform Reconsidered. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
  4. Congress of Local and Regional Authorities, Monitoring Committee. (2016). Comparative Analysis of the Implementation of the European Charter of Local Self-Government in 47 Member States. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  5. Dahl, R. A., & Tufte, E. R. (1973). Size and Democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Denters, B., Goldsmith, M., Ladner, A., Mouritzen, P., & Rose, L. E. (2014). Size and Local Democracy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  7. Dyson, K. N. (1980). The State Traditions in Western Europe. A Study of an Idea and Institutions. Oxford: Robertson.Google Scholar
  8. Eurobarometer 79. (2013). Public Opinion in the European Union. The European Commission.Google Scholar
  9. Fukuyama, F. (2014). Political Order and Political Decay. From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  10. Fürstenberg, K. (2016). Evolutionary Institutionalism: New Perspectives. Politics and the Life Sciences, 35, 48–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2001). Multi-level Governance and European Integration. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  12. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2012). Beyond Federalism: Estimating and Explaining the Territorial Structure of Government. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 42, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hooghe, L., Marks, G., Schakel, A. H., Niedzwiecki, S., Chapman Osterkatz, S., & Shair-Rosenfield, S. (2016). Measuring Regional Authority: A Postfunctionalist Theory of Governance (Vol. I). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Illner, M. (2010). Top-Down or Bottom-Up? Coping with Territorial Fragmentation in the Czech Republic. In H. Baldersheim & L. E. Rose (Eds.), Territorial Choice. The Politics of Boundaries and Borders. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Keating, M., & Loughlin, J. (Eds.). (1997). The Political Economy of Regionalism. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  16. Loughlin, J., & Peters, G. B. (1997). State Traditions, Administrative Reforms and Regionalization. In M. Keating & J. Loughlin (Eds.), The Political Economy of Regionalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Loughlin, J., Hendriks, F., & Lidström, A. (Eds.). (2010). The Oxford Handbook of Local and Regional Democracy in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lustick, I. S. (2011). Taking Evolution Seriously: Historical Institutionalism and Evolutionary Theory. Polity, 43, 179–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  20. Mouritzen, P. E. (1991). Den politiske syklus. Aarhus: Forlaget Politika.Google Scholar
  21. Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Inc.Google Scholar
  22. Scharpf, F. W. (1999). Governing in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Steinmo, S. (2010). The Evolution of Modern States: Sweden, Japan, and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Swianiewicz, P. (Ed.). (2010). Territorial Consolidation Reforms in Europe. Budapest: Open Society Institute.Google Scholar
  25. Swianiewicz, P. (2014). An Empirical Typology of Local Government Systems in Eastern Europe. Local Government Studies, 40(2), 292–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Thelen, K. (2004). How Institutions Evolve. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A Pure Theory of Local Government Expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Williamson, O. E. (1981). The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach. The American Journal of Sociology, 87, 548–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Ladner
    • 1
  • Nicolas Keuffer
    • 1
  • Harald Baldersheim
    • 2
  • Nikos Hlepas
    • 3
  • Pawel Swianiewicz
    • 4
  • Kristof Steyvers
    • 5
  • Carmen Navarro
    • 6
  1. 1.IDHEAPUniversity of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  3. 3.National and Kapodistrian University of AthensAthensGreece
  4. 4.Department of Local Development and Policy, Faculty of Geography and Regional StudiesUniversity of WarsawWarszawaPoland
  5. 5.Department of Political ScienceGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  6. 6.Department of Political ScienceUniversidad Autónoma de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations