Investigation of Controlled Vibratory Drilling Dynamics with Variable Velocity Feedback Gain

  • I. IvanovEmail author
  • I. Pleshcheev
  • A. Larkin
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)


During drilling, swarf can block tool’s clearance channel and lead to a standstill of production job. That is why it is advisable to make a drill bit oscillate in the axial direction. The certain amplitude–phase relation guarantees chip breakage. One of the ways to ensure this kind of vibration is to include in the system of tool fastening the special elastic element, characteristics of which are chosen from conditions of axial self-excited vibration excitation in the technological system. It is appropriate to add the control response, which sustains the tool vibrations in a wide range of manufacturing process parameters. In this paper, the model of vibratory drilling dynamics with velocity feedback is given. The possibilities of setting velocity feedback gain as constant and periodical laws have been investigated. The relation between integral characteristics of vibrational process and these laws parameters have been plotted. It is shown that the vibrational characteristics in case the feedback gain is set as a periodical function cannot be achieved in any way if the feedback gain is a constant.


Vibratory drilling Regenerative effect Self-excited vibrations Vibrations control Feedback 


  1. 1.
    Jallageas J, K’nevez JY, Cherif M et al (2013) Modeling and optimization of vibration-assisted drilling on positive feed drilling unit. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67:1205–1216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Popov VE, Vainshenker EA, Margulis MM (1976) Elektro-gidravlicheskiy privod vibrosverlilnovo stanka s programmnym upravleniyem (Electro-hydraulic drive of vibratory drilling machine with programmed control). USSR Patent 510351Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gouskov AM (1997) Razrabotka metodov postroeniya I analiza dinamicheskih modeley tehnologicheskih proseccov pri mehanicheskoy obrabotke (Elaboration of methods for development and analysis of machining dynamic models). Doctoral dissertation, Bauman Moscow State Technical UniversityGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Picard DB, Gouskov AM (2003) Sverlilnaya golovka s vibratsionnym effectom (Drilling head with vibrational effect). RF Patent 2212984Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rabate P, Moraru GF, Picard DB (2011) Drilling tool and device with self-maintained axial vibrations. US patent 0170964A1Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Altintas Y (2012) Manufacturing automation: metal cutting mechanics, machine tool vibrations and CNC design. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Poduraev VN (1970) Obrabotka rezaniyem s vibratsiyami (Cutting with vibrations). Machinostroenie, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Batzer SA, Gouskov AM, Voronov SA (2001) Modeling vibratory drilling dynamics. J Vib Acoust 123:435–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tichkiewitch S, Moraru G, Brun-Picard D et al (2002) Self-excited vibration drilling models and experiments. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 51(1):311–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Paris H, Tichkiewitch S, Peigne G (2005) Modelling the vibratory drilling process to foresee cutting parameters. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 54(1):367–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guibert N, Paris H, Rech J (2008) A numerical simulator to predict the dynamical behavior of the self-vibratory drilling head. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48:644–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Paris H, Brissaud D, Gouskov A et al (2008) Influence of the ploughing effect on the dynamic behaviour of the self-vibratory drilling head. CIRP Ann Manuf Tecnol 57:385–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Guibert N, Paris H, Rech J et al (2009) Identification of thrust force models for vibratory drilling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49:730–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Forestier F, Gagnol V, Ray P et al (2012) Model-based cutting prediction for a self-vibratory drilling head-spindle system. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 52:59–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mousavi S, Gagnol V, Ray P (2013) Machining prediction of spindle-self-vibratory drilling head. J Mater Process Technol 213:2119–2125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kiselev IA, Zhukov NA, Selivanov AN et al (2017) Three-dimensional modeling of deep hole vibratory drilling dynamics. Proc Eng 176:50–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gouskov AM et al (2000) Chatter synchronization in vibratory drilling. Acoust Simul/ASME 68:263–270Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Voronov SA, Gouskov AM, Kvashnin AS et al (2006) Influence of torsional motion on the axial vibrations of a drilling tool. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn 2(1):58–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gouskov AM, Voronov SA, Ivanov II (2015) Investigation of vibratory drilling model with adaptive control. Part 1: control of cutting continuity index. J Vibroeng 17(7):3702–3714Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gouskov AM, Voronov SA, Ivanov II (2015) Investigation of vibratory drilling model with adaptive control. Part 2: mixed control of peak-to-peak vibration displacement and cutting continuity index. J Vibroeng 17(8):4301–4312Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bauman Moscow State Technical UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations