Advertisement

Modeling of Thin-Walled Cylindrical Part Turning Process Dynamics

  • A. Koloskova
  • I. Kiselev
  • S. Voronov
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

This article presents the method of chatter prediction in turning process using 3D diagrams of maximum and minimum vibrations magnitudes, cutting forces, and instantaneous chip thickness along the tool path. The 3D structural dynamic module includes a finite element model of workpiece and surface topography module, a dynamic cutting force prediction module. The gyroscopic effects are taken into the account. A numerical model simulating the turning process of thin-walled cylindrical workpieces for various spindle speed values is considered. The results of the modeling are 3D diagrams of maximum and minimum vibrations magnitudes along the tool path. The simulated results taking into account material removing, gyroscopic effects, and no effects are compared. The results of numerical simulations predict the chatter-free regimes of a turning process.

Keywords

Chatter Turning process dynamics Vibrations 

References

  1. 1.
    Altintas Y, Weck M (2004) Chatter stability of metal cutting and grinding. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 53:619–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gerasimenko A, Guskov M, Gouskov A (2015) Variable compliance-related aspects of chatter in turning thin-walled tubular parts. Procedia CIRP 31:58–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lazoglu I, Atabey F, Altintas Y (2002) Dynamics of boring processes: part III-time domain modeling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42:1567–1576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gouskov AM, Voronov SA, Ivanov II (2015) Investigation of vibratory drilling model with adaptive control. Part 1: control of cutting continuity index. J VibroEng 17–7:3702–3714Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mehdi K, Rigal J-F, Play D (2002) Dynamic behavior of a thin-walled cylindrical workpiece during the turning process, part 1: cutting process simulation. J Manuf Sci Eng 124:562–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Voronov SA, Ivanov II, Kiselev IA (2015) Investigation of the milling process based on a reduced dynamics model of cutting tool. J Mach Manuf Reliabil 44–1:70–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tobias SA, Fishwick W (1958) The chatter of lathe tools under orthogonal cutting conditions. Trans ASME 80:1079–1088Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gouskov AM, Guskov M, Lorong Ph (2017) Influence of flank face on the condition of chatter self-excitation during turning. Int J Mach Mach Mater 19–1:17–40Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tobias SA (1961) Machine tool vibration research. Int J Mach Tool Des Res 1:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tlusty J (1999) Manufacturing processes and equipment. Prentice Hall, NJGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jemielniak K, Widota A (1989) Numerical simulation of non-linear chatter vibration in turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 29–2:239–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Urbikain G, Lopez de Lacalle LN, Campa FJ (2002) Stability prediction in straight turning of a flexible workpiece by collocation method. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 54–55:73–81Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dombovari Z, Barton DAW, Eddie Wilson R, Stepan G (2011) On the global dynamics of chatter in the orthogonal cutting model. Int J Non-Linear Mech 46:330–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Insperger T, Stepan G, Turi J (2007) State-dependent delay in regenerative turning processes. Nonlinear Dyn 47:275–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gerasimenko A, Guskov M, Gouskov AM (2017) Analytical modeling of a thin-walled cylindrical workpiece during the turning process stability analysis of a cutting process. J Vibroeng 19–8:5825–5841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Koloskova AV, Kiselev IA, Ivanov II (2017) Modeling of the turning process dynamics, taking into the account the compliance of the workpiece. Online J Naukovedenie 9–2:1–16Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kiselev I, Voronov S (2014) Methodic of rational cutting conditions determination for 3-d shaped detail milling based on the process numerical simulation. ASME proceedings of 10th international conference on multibody systems, nonlinear dynamics and control. Am Soc Mech Eng 6:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2014-34894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vollan A, Komzsik L (2012) Computational techniques of rotor dynamics with finite element method. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kirchgaßner B (2016) Finite elements in rotordynamics. Procedia Eng 144:736–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kaymakci M, Kilic ZM, Altintas Y (2012) Unified cutting force model for turning, boring, drilling and milling operations. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 54–55:34–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bauman Moscow State Technical UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations