Virtual Prototyping Experience of the Coriolis Flow Meter

  • V. A. RomanovEmail author
  • V. P. Beskachko
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)


The subject of the study is the selection of the parameters of the model for finite element analysis (FEA) of the Coriolis flow meter. Based on the comparison of the results of calculations with previous experiments, it is shown that the built model can be used as a virtual prototype of the Coriolis flow meter when working with a single-phase liquid. Particular attention is paid to the detected danger of multiple overestimations of the dissipative properties of the model of the coupled nonlinear oscillatory system “elastic tube—liquid flowing through it”, built using the Two-Way Fluid–Structure Interaction (FSI) technology. It is shown that the overestimation of the dissipative characteristics leads to a distortion of the shape of the resonance oscillations, which makes such a model unacceptable for estimating the phase relations for both force and kinematic excitation. The settings of the design model allowing to obtain an idealized design case of the Coriolis flow meter without energy losses are given, and thus, they help to isolate the component of the sensor output signal (phase shift), which is caused solely by the flow of liquid.


Flow measurements Coriolis flow meter Computer simulation Numerical model 



Authors are grateful for financial support of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (grant No. 9.9676.2017/8.9).


  1. 1.
    Wang T, Baker R (2014) Coriolis flowmeters: a review of developments over the past 20 years, and an assessment of the state of the art and likely future directions. Flow Meas Instrum 40:99–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Binulal BR, Jayaraj K (2014) Coriolis flow meter—a review from 1989 to 2014. Int J Sci Eng Res 5:718–723Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anklin M, Drahm W, Rieder A (2006) Coriolis mass flowmeters: overview of the current state of the art and latest research. Flow Meas Instrum 17:317–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Basse NT (2014) A review of the theory of Coriolis flowmeter measurement errors due to entrained particles. Flow Meas Instrum 37:107–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kutin J, Bajsić I (2002) An analytical estimation of the Coriolis meter’s characteristics based on modal superposition. Flow Meas Instrum 12:345–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sultan G, Hemp J (1989) Modelling of the Coriolis mass flowmeter. J Sound Vib 132:473–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lange U, Levien A, Pankratz T et al (1994) Effect of detector masses on calibration of Coriolis flowmeters. Flow Meas Instrum 5:255–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Raszillier H, Alleborn N, Durst F (1994) Effect of a concentrated mass on Coriolis flow metering. Arch Appl Mech 64:373–382zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang T, Baker RC (2006) An advanced numerical model for single straight tube Coriolis flowmeters. J Fluids Eng 128:1346–1350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ruoff J, Hodapp M, Kück H (2014) Finite element modelling of Coriolis mass flowmeters with arbitrary pipe geometry and unsteady flow conditions. Flow Meas Instrum 37:119–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Belhadj A, Cheesewright R, Clark C (2000) The simulation of Coriolis meter response to pulsating flow using a general purpose F.E. code. J Fluids Struct 14:613–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stack C, Garnett G, Pawlas G (1993) A finite element for the vibration analysis of a fluid-conveying Timoshenko beam. In: AIAA/ASME structures, structural dynamics and materials conference. AIAA Technical Paper, AIAA-93-1552-CPGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mironov MA, Pyatakov PA, Andreev AA (2010) Forced flexural oscillations of a pipe with a liquid flow. Acoust J 56:684–692Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bobovnik G, Mole N, Kutin J et al (2005) Coupled finite-volume/finite-element modelling of the straight-tube Coriolis flowmeter. J Fluids Struct 20:785–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mole N, Bobovnik G, Kutin J et al (2008) An improved three-dimensional coupled fluid–structure model for Coriolis flowmeters. J Fluids Struct 24:559–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kumar V, Anklin M (2011) Numerical simulations of Coriolis flow meters for low Reynolds number flows. Mapan 26:225–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Luo R, Wu J, Wan S (2013) Numerical study on the effect of low Reynolds number flows in straight tube Coriolis flowmeters. In: XX IMEKO world congress metrology for green growth, Busan, 9–14 Sept 2012Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Luo R, Wu J (2013) Fluid-structure coupling analysis and simulation of viscosity effect on Coriolis mass flowmeter. In: 5th Asia pacific congress on computational mechanics & 4th international symposium on computational mechanics, Singapore, 11–14 Dec 2013Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Huber C, Nuber M, Anklin M (2014) Effect of Reynolds number in Coriolis flow measurement. In: European flow measurement workshop, Lisbon, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Romanov VA, Beskachko VP (2017) The simulation of Coriolis flow meter tube movements excited by fluid flow and exterior harmonic force. In: Advanced mathematical and computational tools in metrology and testing XI, Technology & Innovation Centre, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, 29–31 Aug 2017Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.South Ural State UniversityChelyabinskRussia

Personalised recommendations