Advertisement

Method of Investigating Dynamic Operating Modes of Electrohydraulic Drive Systems with Movable Boundaries of Working Fluids

  • A. I. Ozerskij
  • N. A. Tseligorov
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

The paper provides a methodology of the difficult hydropower-driven systems equipped with primary energy sources of two types: explosive motors and the electric motors operating under trying conditions of maintenance. The latter, alongside with hydropower-driven systems, are modeled as uniform heat-electro hydromechanical systems, optimum control with which one can carry out on the basis of a mechanotronic approach and a principle of a maximum developed by L.S. Pontrjagin. The method for investigating dynamic operating modes of electrohydraulic drive systems with movable boundaries of operating fluids was described. The method is original as it allows one to calculate dynamic operating modes of the abovementioned systems in the cases when fluids of these systems have movable boundaries of the following type: “fluid–gas” or “fluid–solid” (“fluid–piston”). The description of engineering, physical, and mathematical models of the investigated processes was presented.

Keywords

Electrohydraulic systems Dynamic modes Movable boundaries Calculation method Engineering simulation Physical simulation Mathematical modeling 

References

  1. 1.
    Tseligorov NA, Tseligorova EN (2015) Research robust absolute stability of system of stabilization of the flying machine. In: Abstracts 14th international conference “Aircraft and astronautics—2015”, MAI, Moscow, 16–20 Nov 2015Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Qinyang G, Guanglin S, Changyu H et al (2017) Adaptive robust dynamic surface control of electro-hydraulic system with unknown nonlinear disturbance. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference of control, dynamic systems, and robotics, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kljuchev VI (1985) Teoriya electroprivoda (Theory of electric drive). Energoatomizdat, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Osman A, Nagarajan T, Hashim F (2013) Analysis of innovative design of energy efficient hydraulic actuators. Int J Eng Res Appl (IJERA) 569:1–7Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xiao Q, Wang Q, Zhang Y (2008) Control strategies of power system in hybrid hydraulic excavator. Autom Constr 17(4):361–367.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2007.05.01.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eriksson B (2007) Control strategy for energy efficient fluid power actuators: utilizing individual metering. Linköping UniversityGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vael G, Achten P, Potma G et al (2003) Cylinder control with the floating cup hydraulic transformer. In: Proceedings of the eight Scandinavian international conference on fluid power, SICFP’03, Tampere, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ozerskij AI, Poluhin DA, Sizonov VS (1979) Research of one-dimensional motion of fluids with contact tearing up in the trunks containing pumps. In: Proceedings of the USSR academy of science. Power Eng Transp 2:143–150Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fenton J (2017) A first course in hydraulics. http://johndfenton.com/Alternative-Hydraulics.html. Accessed 15 Dec 2017
  10. 10.
    Liu TC, Khoo BC, Yeo KS (2001) The simulation of compressible multi-medium flow. II. Applications to 2D underwater shock refraction. Comput Fluids 765:315–337.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7930(00)00021-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ozersky AI (2010) Application of Lagrange approach to solving the problems of dynamics of hydraulic systems of hydraulic power and heat-power installations. Vestn DSTU 6(1002):914–925Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Basniev KS, Dmitriev N, Chilingar G et al (2012) Mechanics of fluid flow. Scrivener Publishing LLC, Wiley, 568 pGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chikulaev DG, Shvarts KG (2017) Effect of rotation on the monotonic instability mode of advective flow in a horizontal incompressible fluid layer with rigid boundaries in the case of normal spiral perturbations.  https://doi.org/10.7242/1999-6691/2016.9.1.3. Accessed 15 Dec 2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pember RB, Anderson RW (2001) Comparison of direct Eulerian Godunov and Lagrange plus remap, artificial viscosity schemes. In: Proceedings of 14th AIAA computational fluid dynamics conference, AnaheimGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ozerskij AI, Shoshiashvili ME (2014) The method of calculating dynamic modes of operation of electro-hydraulic drive with ampulized hydraulic system. Izv High Sch North-Cauc Reg Eng 1(148):52–60Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sedov LI (1973) Mechanika splotchnoy sredy (Mechanics of the continuous medium). Nauka, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ozersky AI (2013) Modeling of dynamic operating modes hydro driven systems with thermal and electric energy sources. Izv High Sch Sev-Kavk Region Tech Sci 5(100):37–43Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ozerskiy AI, Shoshiahvili ME (2014) Simulation of electro-hydraulic drive with ampulized hydraulic system. In: Works of the international scientific and technical conference “computer modeling and simulation”. Publishing House Polytechnical University, St. Petersburg, pp 68–71Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Karnopp DC, Margolis DL, Rosenberg RC (2012) System dynamics: modeling, simulation, and control of mechatronic systems. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chiasson J (2005) Modeling and high-performance control of electrical machines. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Don State Technical UniversityRostov-on-DonRussia

Personalised recommendations