Advertisement

Calculated and Experimental Study of Free Vibrations of a Cylindrical Shell

  • D. A. Permyakov
  • A. S. Pantileev
  • S. V. Makhnovich
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

At designing of thin-walled structures for aerospace engineering, it is vital to identify their frequencies and modes of free vibrations based on the results of frequency tests and the finite-element analysis. The paper defines calculated frequencies and modes of free vibrations of a cylindrical shell based on the finite-element model. Experimental frequencies and modes of free vibrations are obtained by the impulse excitation method. The authors used the Modal Assurance Criterion to evaluate matching of the calculated and experimental eigenmodes. However, such evaluation is complicated due to the limited number of sensors (to measure the mode and the frequency of free vibrations) and the presence of initial imperfections not taken into account in the calculated shell model. Based on the study of the Modal Assurance Criterion sensitivity to the difference of the relevant pairs of calculated and experimental vibrations of nodes, the authors have shown the influence of the initial imperfections on the eigenmodes. Based on the results of this study, the authors have identified nodes and areas of the shell with the maximum difference of the compared modes. By adjustment of the calculated vibration mode with regard to the experimental one in the circumferential direction, the authors have improved the values of the Modal Assurance Criterion. The location of the imperfection area and evaluation of its influence are used to specify the eigenmodes of the calculated shell model and to increase the modeling accuracy of the structure’s dynamic characteristics.

Keywords

Cylindrical shell Finite-element model Modal analysis Modal assurance criterion 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by Act 211 Government of the Russian Federation, contract № 02.A03.21.0011.

References

  1. 1.
    Mezhin VS, Obukhov VV (2014) Practice of applying modal tests for verification of finite-element models of the space-rocket product structures. Space Eng Technol 1:86–91Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allemang RJ, Randall J (2003) The modal assurance criterion (MAC): 20 years of use and abuse. Sound Vibr 37(8):14–23Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fotsch D, Ewins DJ (2000) Application of MAC in the frequency domain. Rolls Royce PLC-Report-PNRGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Test-Analysis Correlation-Updating Considerations. http://faculty.uml.edu/pavitabile/22.515/Correlation_Topics_122901_1.pdf. Accessed 14 Mar 2018
  5. 5.
    Pugach IYu (2015) Development of procedural guidelines to increase the accuracy of modeling the dynamic characteristics of elements of the ERS space vehicles. Structures at the calculated and ground exercise stage: abstract of a thesis for a degree of Ph.D. in technical sciences. OJSC VNIIEM Corporation, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Potapov AN (2003) Ratios of orthogonality of free vibration modes in elastic-plastic dissipative systems. SUSU publishing house, ChelyabinskGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ambartsumyan SA (1961) Theory of anisotropic shells. Physmathgiz, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vlasov VZ (1949) General theory for shells and its Application in Engineering. Gostekhizdat Publ, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gontkevich VS (1964) Natural vibrations of plates and shells. Kiev: Nauk, DumkaGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Panovko YaG (1977) Introduction to the theory of Mechanical Oscillations. Nauka, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Breslavsky VE (1953) On the vibrations of cylindrical shells. In the book: Ing. Collection of the USSR AS OTN XVI: 126–135Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oniashvili OD (1957) Some dynamic problems in the theory of shells. Izd AN SSSR, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Arnold RN, Warburton BB (1949) Flexural vibrations of the walls of thin cylindrical shells having free supported ends. Proc of the Roy Soc of London (A): 238–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    GOST ISO 7626-5-99 (2000) Vibration and stroke. Experimental determination of mechanical mobility. Part 5. Measurements using impulse excitation by the exciter not attached to the structure. Minsk: Interstate Council for Standardization, Metrology and CertificationGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ponomarev IS, Makhnovich VS, Pantileev AS (2016) Characteristics of experimental determination of frequencies and modes of free vibrations of a cylindrical shell. Sci Bull Novosibirsk State Techn Uni 3(64):44–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Heylen V, Lammens S, Sas P (2010) Modal analysis: theory and tests. Novatest, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Miroslav P, Michal B (2012) Modal assurance criterion. Proc Eng 48: 543–48548Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Skubachevsky GS (1984) Aircraft Gas-Turbine Engines: Design and Estimation of Parts. Mechanical Engineering, MoscowGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. A. Permyakov
    • 1
  • A. S. Pantileev
    • 1
  • S. V. Makhnovich
    • 1
  1. 1.South Ural State UniversityChelyabinskRussia

Personalised recommendations