Advertisement

Features of Decision-Making Simulation When Designing Locomotive Underframe Part

  • V. I. Vorobiev
  • O. V. Izmerov
  • S. O. Kopyilov
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

The analysis of the logic of choice of design options for the locomotive underframe part is carried out. It is established that the solution of the problem situation in the choice of the design of the units of the outfit part is the development of a multivariate strategy for creating and mastering the production of various design variants. A new design of the traction drive is proposed and patented, instead of a technologically complex integrated axial thrust drive, it is offered to use a support frame drive with an axial reduction gear at the early stages of implementation, with a subsequent transition to an axle-type traction drive of the aggregate type, combining high processability and the possibility of reducing the TM weight.

Keywords

Traction drive Asynchronous electric motor Reliability Design Modeling 

References

  1. 1.
    Lockett H, Guenov M A knowledge based expert system for moulded part design. ICED’07/426Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Capilla R, Bosch J, Kang K (2013) Systems and software variability management. Springer, p 300Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jones SW (1973) Product design and process selection. Butterworth, p 206Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pahl G, Beitz W (1996) Engineering design—a systematic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, p 620Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Park G-J (2007) Analytic methods for design practice. Springer, p 627Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bourdot P, Convard T, Picon F, Ammi M, Touraine D, Vezien J-M (2010) VR-CAD integration: multimodal immersive interaction and advanced haptic paradigms for implicit edition of CAD models. Comput Aided Des 42:445–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen Y, Liu Z-L, Xie Y-B (2012) A knowledge-based framework for creative conceptual design of multidisciplinary sytems. Comput Aided Des 44:146–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kondrashov V, Maksimov I, Galperin V (1999) Development of the wheel profiles of cars and locomotives for the existing railways for reduction of wear of wheel flanges and lateral surfaces of rail. International heavy haul association STS-conference “wheel/rail interface”, vol 1, pp 95–102Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jendel T (2002) Prediction of wheel profile wear—comparisons with field measurements. Wear 253:89–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Braghin F, Lewis R, Dwyer-Joyce RS, Brunia S (2006) A mathematical model to predict railway wheel profile evolution due to wear. J Wear 261:1253–1264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu Y, Liu L, Stratman B, Mahadevan S (2008) Multiaxial fatigue reliability analysis of railroad wheels. J Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93:456–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pombo J, Ambrosio J, Pereira M, Lewis R, Dwyer-Joyce R, Ariaudo C, Kuka N (2010) A railway wheel wear prediction tool based on a multibody software. J Theor Appl Mech 48(3):751–770zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lin J, Asplund M, Parida A (2014) Reliability analysis for degradation of locomotive wheels using parametric bayesian approach. Qual Reliab Eng Int 30:657–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kumar U, Ahmadi A, Verma AK, Varde P (2016) Current trends in reliability, availability, maintainability and safety. Springer, Berlin, p 738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bimal K (1997) Bose power electronics and variable frequency drives. IEEE Press, p 640Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kondo K, Matsuoka K (2000) Control system of permanent magnet synchronous motor for railway vehicle traction. Q Rep RTRI 41:94–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ghate P, Shankapal SR, Gowda MH (2012) Failure investigation of a freight locomotive suspension spring and redesign of the spring for durability and ride index. SASTECH J 11:23–29Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Myamlin S, Luchanin M, Neduzha L (2013) Construction analysis of mechanical parts of locomotives. TEKA Comm Motorization Energetics Agric 13:162–169Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vorobyov VI, Strizhenok AG, Izmerov OV (2016) Search for new constructive schemes of geared and direct drive locomotive traction drive with partial mass curing. Bull Bryansk State Tech Univ 1(49):16–21Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Naveen S, Kiran CP, Prabhu Das M, Naga Dilip P, Prathibha Bharathi VV (2014) Study on bogie and suspension system of an electric locomotive (Wap-4). IJMER 4:1–14Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Railway technical handbook (2012) SKF Group 2:236Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vorobiev VI, Izmerov OV, Novikov VG, Vdovin AV, Bondarenko DA, Novikov AS, Vorobiev DV (2016) Traction drive locomotive. RF Patent 164797, 20 Sept 2016Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. I. Vorobiev
    • 1
  • O. V. Izmerov
    • 1
  • S. O. Kopyilov
    • 1
  1. 1.Bryansk State Technical UniversityBryanskRussia

Personalised recommendations