Advertisement

Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Cable Excavator Bucket Swing Mechanism

  • V. S. Isakov
  • V. P. Maksimov
  • Y. V. Maksimov
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

The paper presents the results of experimental and analytical study of the innovative, non-driven mechanism of the cable excavator bucket swing. This required a mathematical model of the digging workflow to be complemented with the necessary technical characteristics of the working body elements, including hydraulic cylinders, performing the role of kinematic links of variable length and their connecting pipelines in the adopted mechanism scheme. The results obtained on the basis of the mathematical model were verified by the experiment and proved to be quite a reliable tool that can simulate the bucket swing mechanism operation in a variety of production conditions on different types of cable excavators.

Keywords

Cable excavator Bucket swing Experimental studies Numerical modeling 

References

  1. 1.
    Isakov VS, Maksimov VP, Maksimov YV (2015) Justication of an adaptive working body of a cable excavator. Proc Eng 129:910–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Isakov VS, Maksimov YV (2008) On the prospects of using single-bucket excavators with a cable suspension. In: New technologies for controlling the movement of technical objects: Col of articles on the materials of the 9th international scientific-technical Conference, vol 1, pp 59–62Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Isakov VS, Maksimov YV (2008) The use of intense closed kinematic loops in the operation mechanisms of excavators. In: Modern trends in the Russian system of higher education: materials of conference Tver, TSTU, Tver, 14–16 May 2008, pp 8–9Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Maksimov VP, Maksimov YV (2013) The conceptual design of innovative working bodies of cable excavators. Engineering Don Gazette, no 4. https://www/ivdon.ru/magazine/archive/n4y2013/2183
  5. 5.
    Isakov VS, Maksimov YV, Simileysky (2012) Tools and machinery of bucket excavator. RF Patent 2450106, IPC E02F 3/42, Bull. 13, 8 pGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shemetov PA, Rubtsov SK, Shlykov AG (2005) Experience in the exploitation of cable and hydraulic excavators in the conditions of the Muruntau quarry. Mining industry, no 5. https://www.mining-media.ru/en/article/karertekh/1227-opyt-ekspluatatsii-kanatnykh-i-gidravlicheskikh-ekskavatorov-v-usloviyakh-karera-muruntau
  7. 7.
    Kölsch HR, Brodsey GS (2008) Prediction of service life resource of hydraulic pumps and motors of hydraulic drives of mining excavators under low-temperature conditions. Min Equip Electromech 11:35–37Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mandrovsky KP (2007) Competitiveness assessment of shovel excavators. Dorozhnaya derzhava 5:50–52Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maksimov YV (2013) Kinematic study of the cable excavator bucket swing mechanism. Engineering Don Gazette, no 4. https://www/ivdon.ru/magazine/archive/n4y2013/2174
  10. 10.
    Maksimov YV, Maksimov VP (2014) Mathematical modeling of the digging process of a cable excavator with a swing bucket. Modern problems of science and education no 2. https://www.science-education.ru/116-12285
  11. 11.
    Dombrovsky NG (1969) Excavators. Mechanical Engineering, Moscow, 318 pGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Isakov VS (2005) Inertia braking devices based on the closed kinematic loops. Publishing House of magazine “News of Higher Educational Institutions. North-Caucasus Region”, Rostov on Don, 140 pGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Artobolevsky II (2012) Theory of mechanisms and machines: a textbook, 4th ed, revised. Publishing House Alliance, Moscow, 640 pGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ananin VG (2007) Determination of optimal parameters for working equipment of a mining excavator with a mechanical drive. Constr Road Mach 6:36–38Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Balovnev VI (2006) Selection and definition of parameters of single-bucket excavators. MADI, Moscow, p 71Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pavlov VP, Abramov AN (1984) Recommendations for the selection of parameters of excavating buckets. Transp Constr 7:35–36Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kuzmin SS (2003) Excavation parameters by a back shovel bucket swing. Dissertation Moscow, 139 pGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tarasik VP (2004) Mathematical modeling of technical systems: a textbook for the institutions of higher education. Design PRO, Minsk, p 640Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Weitz VL, Kochura AE, Martynenko AM (1971) Dynamic calculations of machine drives. Mechanical Engineering, Leningrad, 352 pGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kelton V, Low A (2004) Simulation modeling. Classics. CS. CS Peter, St. Petersburg, p 847Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dyakonov VP (2011) Maple 10/11/12/13/14 in mathematical calculations. DMK-Press, Moscow, 800 pGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. S. Isakov
    • 1
  • V. P. Maksimov
    • 1
  • Y. V. Maksimov
    • 2
  1. 1.Platov South-Russian State Polytechnic University (NPI)NovocherkasskRussia
  2. 2.LLC “Rostselmash”Rostov-on-DonRussia

Personalised recommendations