Advertisement

New Roller Testing Unit for Vehicles

  • I. P. Troyanovskaya
  • I. Yu. Novikova
  • I. S. Zhitenko
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

The paper is devoted to investigating a roller testing unit with a closed circuit for testing wheeled vehicles. A distinctive feature of the unit is its rigid connection between cylindrical surfaces which causes a kinematic mismatch between their angular velocities of rotation. The authors consider the power and kinematic interaction of a vehicle wheel with cylindrical surfaces in a new type of testing units, and find experimentally an interaction between the power and kinematic parameters of the contact between a tire and a cylindrical surface in the driving mode. A mathematical model of the testing unit with a closed circuit is developed to analyze the behavior of power flows at various mismatching transmission ratios. Therefore, some recommendations for choosing reasonable values of transmission ratios for various types of testing for wheeled vehicles are given. The proposed testing unit provides a constant value of skidding, which expands the diagnostic capabilities of testers of this type. It makes possible to determine the elastic and traction qualities of tires in all running modes (driven, driving, or braking), to carry out running, short time and braking testing for vehicles, to test tires for wear, heat resistance and strength, to carry out shafting tests of engines with and without loading, to test the turning mode with accelerated testing of differentials, and to simulate different ground conditions under wheels by providing different kinds of skidding.

Keywords

Roller testing unit Closed circuit Cylindrical surfaces Kinematic mismatch Power circulation Bench testing 

References

  1. 1.
    Belkin AE, Semenov VK (2016) Theoretical and experimental analysis of the contact between a solid-rubber tire and a chassis dynamometer. J Mech Solids 51(3):298–307.  https://doi.org/10.3103/S0025654416030067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bojko AV (2008) Improving the diagnostic method for vehicle brake systems with power testing units equipped with cylindrical surfaces. Dissertation, Irkutsk State Technical UniversityGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Huang W, Yu M, Fu W et al (2016) Analysis of influencing factors on testing results of vehicle roller anti-force brake testing platform. J Jiangsu Univ (Natural Science Edition) 37(5):497–502.  https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7775.2016.05.001
  4. 4.
    Loginov JV, Lovushkin VA, Shvedov SA (2011) Test bench. RU Patent 2431814 C1, 20 Nov 2011Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stashevskij II (1994) Accelerating stand for imitation tests of undercarriages of wheeled vehicles. RU Patent 2022930 C1, 15 Nov 1994Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fedotov AI, Vlasov VG, Yankov OS (2017) Power circulation under the interaction of braking vehicle wheel tyre and support rollers of the diagnostic test bench. J Bull Irkutsk State Tech Univ 21(7):178–186.  https://doi.org/10.21285/1814-3520-2017-7-178-186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mazur VV, Gaylish AV (2011) The method of measuring the vehicle speed when it moves on cylindrical surfaces of the testing unit and the device for its implementation. J Mech XXI Century 10:126–128Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gusev AG, Troyanovskaya IP (2007) Mathematical model of interaction of a vehicle wheel with cylindrical surfaces in stands kinematically mismatched. J Bull Kalashnikov ISTU 3:3–6Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kotiev GO, Gorelov VA, Zakharov AY (2014) Simulation modeling of wheeled vehicle dynamics on the stand “Roller”. J Sci Educ 4:45–63.  https://doi.org/10.7463/0414.0707918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pacejka HB (1974) Some recent investigations into dynamics and frictional behavior of pneumatic tires (Physics. Tire tract. Theory and Experiment). New York, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yankov OS (2017) Comparison of wheel braking process depending on the mode of wheel setting on test bench support rollers. J Bull Irkutsk State Tech Univ 21(2):208–219.  https://doi.org/10.21285/1814-3520-2017-2-208-219MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bojko A, Fedotov AI, Khalezov WP, Młyńczak M (2015) Analysis of brake testing methods in vehicle safety. In: European safety and reliability conference, Wroclaw in Poland, 14–18 Sept 2014Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pozin BM, Troyanovskaya IP, Yusupov AA (2015) Optimal power distributing between wheels of the mobile vehicle under different soil conditions. J Procedia Eng 129:713–717.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guskov VV, Dzioma AA, Kolola AS et al (2017) Investigation of process pertaining to interaction of tractor driving wheels with ground surface. J Sci Tech 16(1):83–88.  https://doi.org/10.21122/2227-1031-2017-16-1-83-88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Troyanovskaya IP, Pozin BM (2015) Forces of friction at the wheel-to-ground contact in a turning vehicle. J Procedia Eng 129:156–160.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Berezin VS, Pozhbelko VI, Gusev AG, Dudunikov AG (2005) Wheeled vehicle shaftline system test stand. RU Patent 2267109 C1, 27 Dec 2005Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. P. Troyanovskaya
    • 1
    • 2
  • I. Yu. Novikova
    • 1
  • I. S. Zhitenko
    • 1
  1. 1.South Ural State Agrarian UniversityChelyabinskRussia
  2. 2.South Ural State UniversityChelyabinskRussia

Personalised recommendations