Advertisement

Multiphysics Simulation of Electromagnetic Forming of Aluminum Alloy Tubes

  • V. M. Volgin
  • V. D. Kukhar
  • A. E. Kireeva
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

This paper is devoted to the study of coupled electromagnetic, mechanical, and heat transfer processes at electromagnetic forming of tubes. A multiphysics mathematical model of coupled, high-speed electrical, magnetic, mechanical, and heat transfer processes in the system “Installation-Coil-Workpiece” taking into account the characteristics of the technological system is developed. Numerical simulation of electromagnetic forming was performed by a finite element method within the 2D axisymmetric approximation. The effect of the main process parameters and modeling technique on electromagnetic forming of aluminum alloy tubes are investigated.

Keywords

Electromagnetic forming Multiphysics simulation Finite element method 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The results of the research project are published with the financial support of Tula State University within the framework of the scientific project № 8702.

References

  1. 1.
    Belyy V, Ferrtik SM, Khimenko LT (1996) Electromagnetic metal forming handbook, English version of Russian book translated by Altynova M.M. Ohio State University, USAGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Psyk V, Risch D, Kinsey BL, Tekkaya AE, Kleiner M (2011) Electromagnetic forming—a review. J Mater Process Technol 211(5):787–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gayakwad D, Dargar MK, Sharma PK, Rana RS (2014) A review on electromagnetic forming process. Proc Mater Sci 6:520–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Furth HP, Waniek RW (1962) New ideas on magnetic forming. Metal working Prod 106:92–95Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Giannoglou A, Kladas A, Tegopoulos J, Koumoutsos A, Manolakos D, Mamalis A (2004) Electromagnetic forming: a coupled numerical electromagnetic-mechanical-electrical approach compared to measurements. COMPEL 23(3):789–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mamalis AG, Manolakos DE, Kladas AG, Koumoutsos AK (2006) Electromagnetic forming tools and processing conditions: numerical simulation. Mater Manuf Process 21(4):411–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Unger J, Stiemer M, Schwarze M, Svendsen B, Blum H, Reese S (2008) Strategies for 3D simulation of electromagnetic forming processes. J Mater Process Technol 199(1):341–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bartels G, Schatzing W, Scheibe HP, Leone M (2009) Comparison of two different simulation algorithms for the electromagnetic tube compression. Int J Mater Form 2(1):693–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yu HU, Chunfeng LI, Jianghua DENG (2009) Sequential coupling simulation for electromagnetic–mechanical tube compression by finite element analysis. J Mater Process Tech 209(2):707–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Demir OK, Psyk V, Tekkaya AE (2010) Simulation of tube wrinkling in electromagnetic compression. Prod Eng 4(4):421–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Uhlmann E, Ziefle A (2011). Simulation approaches for pulse magnetic forming. Prod Eng 5(6):659–665. Cui X, Mo J, Han F (2012) 3D Multi-physics field simulation of electromagnetic tube forming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 59(5):521–529Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim J, Noh HG, Song WJ, Kang BS (2015) Analysis of electromagnetic forming process using sequential electromagnetic-structural coupling simulation. Int J Appl Electromagnet 49(2):263–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Patel C, Ghatule P, Kore SD (2017) Finite element analysis of effect of process parameters on electromagnetic free expansion of aluminium tube. Int J Mater Prod Tec 54(1–3):165–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Feng H, Cui XY, Li GY (2017) Coupled-field simulation of electromagnetic tube forming process using a stable nodal integration method. Int J Mech Sci 128:332–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Manea TE, Verweij MD, Blok H (2002) The importance of velocity term in the electromagnetic forming process. In: Proceedings of 27th general assembly international union radio science, pp 112–115Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Johnson GR, Cook WH (1983) A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. In: Proceedings of 7th international symposium on ballistics, vol 21, issue 1, pp 541–547Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hodko AA (2014) Features of a choice of models of metal plasticity deformable workpiece by the numerical study of hydrodynamic process stamping. Aerosp Techn Technol 5:11–24 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Golovashchenko S, Dmitriev V, Canfield P, Krause A, Maranville C (2009) Apparatus for electromagnetic forming with durability and efficiency enhancements. U.S. Patent No. 7540180Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Golovashchenko SF (2007) Material formability and coil design in electromagnetic forming. J Mater Eng Perform 16(3):314–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gale WF, Totemeier TC (eds) (2003) Smithells metals reference book. Butterworth-HeinemannGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tula State UniversityTulaRussia

Personalised recommendations