Advertisement

Development of Complex of Performance Indicators of a Flexible Abrasive Tool for Assessing the Effectiveness of Application

  • N. V. Syreyshchikova
  • V. V. Batyev
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

The results of the development of a complex of operational parameters of a flexible abrasive tool and methods for quality control of grinding bands, grinding paper, etc. are given on performance indicators and quality control of the petal circles in production conditions for performance indicators. Analytical models have been developed to calculate the selected indicators, and their physical meaning has been determined. The developed sets of performance indicators specify the minimum necessary and sufficient number of indicators to assess the properties of a flexible abrasive tool. Application of the developed set of operational parameters of a flexible abrasive tool, determined by uniform methods of quality control of FAT in production conditions, allows using a flexible abrasive tool for its intended purpose economically and efficiently.

Keywords

Complex of operational indicators Flexible abrasive tool Method of control Quality assessment in production conditions 

References

  1. 1.
    Zaitseva MA, Ulanova ME, Skochko AP (2002) Operational features of a grinding skins on special synthetic ties. Tools for highly effective grinding. VNIIAH NIIMASH, Chelyabinsk, pp 24–31Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abrasives (2016) Uses widening but improved quality moderating demand. Ind Miner 46:9–28Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Agasaryan RR (1985) Dependence of the bearing capacity of the surface layer on the method of finish abrasive processing. Bull Mach Build 8:66–68Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baboshkin AF, Zubarev YM, Pirozerskaya OL (2001) Parameters of the abrasive belt working surface during operation. Abrasive processing processes, abrasive tools and materials. Articles of international scientific conference Shlifabraziv VolgGASA, pp 62–63Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baboshkin AF, Pirozerskaya OL (2001) Change of geometric parameters of abrasive grains in the process of wear of abrasive belts. Abrasive processing processes, abrasive tools and materials. Articles of international scientific conference Shlifabraziv VolgGASA, pp 64–66Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bayor BN, Semenov AV (2011) Methodology of the calculation determination of the characteristics of an abrasive tool. STIN 2:15–18Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Borisov VB, Bolshagin NP (2014) Precision and productivity grinding processing. Sci Prod 7:20–21Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Butorin GI, Isakov VM, Ardashev DV (2012) Complex of operational parameters of abrasive tools. Theoretical and experimental studies of abrasive materials. UNSC of the USSR Academy of Sciences. Sverdlovsk, pp 25–30Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nosenko VA, Nosenko SV (2015) Technology of grinding metals, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stratievsky IK, Yuryev VG, Zubarev YM (2010) Abrasive treatment: reference book. Engineering, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guzeev VI, Syreyshchikov AA (2014) Using the method of structuring the quality function for a flexible abrasive tool. Quality management of life, education, products and the environment in the regions of Russia. International scientific conference. Orel STU. Orel, pp 98–100Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ivanov YuI, Nosov NV (2012) Efficiency and quality of processing tools on a flexible basis. Machine-building, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Buchner S (2015) Schleifscheibenhökte und Bindun-gemenge bei Keramischen Schleifscheiben. Vorträge der Konferenz über Herstellung und Anwendung vön Schleifscheiben, UngarnGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kostin NV, Kostin AN, Ageev SS, Gubarev SV (1999) Increase of efficiency of belt grinding. Mach Tool 8:27–28Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guzeev VI, Sibs AA (2014) Stand for certification tests of a flexible abrasive tool. XX Russian School on Problems of Design of Inhomogeneous Constructions. Inform Materials. MNTC, Miass, pp 74–75Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maslov EN (1974) Theory of metal grinding. Mechanical Engineering, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Quality control of fiber grinding discs according to performance indices in production conditions (2007) Unified methodology. VNIITEMR, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Korchak SN, Koshin AA, Butorin GI (1979) Complex optimization model of grinding processes. Progressive methods of abrasive, diamond and elbor processing in mechanical engineering. NIIMASH, Moscow, pp 31–33Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yakimov AV (1984) Abrasive-diamond processing of shaped surfaces. Mechanical Engineering, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Meyer K (2014) Das Hochleistungs-Bandschleifen und von zwei Einsatzbeispielen. Macchine 3:15–16Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Seward W (2015) Abrasive belt grinding and polishing. Do best work if basic principles applied. Can Mach Ketalworking 2:57–55, 71Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.South Ural State UniversityChelyabinskRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations