Advertisement

Modeling Relationship Between Different Stages of Cylindrical Grinding Process with Axial Feed in Reversal Zones

  • P. P. Pereverzev
  • A. V. Akintseva
  • M. K. Alsigar
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

Operation efficiency management for cylindrical grinding with axial in-feed (for instance, internal and external grinding) at a numerical control machine (CNC) is performed with an automated adjustment of radial and axial in-feed within a staged cycle depending on the amount of the remaining part of allowance. However, grinding in reverse and non-reverse areas is performed with different cutting modes due to a number of factors: the presence of cylindrical grinding with radial in-feed at penetration stage at the beginning of a working path, necessity of reverse switch of axial in-feed, and the cutout of axial in-feed at penetration and reverse switching stages. As a result, the dynamics of actual radial in-feed and cutting force in all sections of a treated surface is significantly different in terms of grinding methods and value. That is the reason why treatment precision may vary depending on the length of a treated surface. The article describes the standardization processing steps of the scientific method in the reverse zones and shows a functional relationship interaction the actual radial feed, programmed radial feed in axial feed grinding. Also, there are data on how elastic deformations change the axis of the circle at all stages.

Keywords

Reverse zone Over-stroke cycle Cycle Cutting conditions External grinding Internal grinding 

References

  1. 1.
    Pereverzev PP, Akintseva AV (2016) Modeling of metal removal during an internal grinding in view of kinematics cutting feature. Russ Eng Res 36(10):888–893.  https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068798X1610015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pereverzev PP, Akintseva AV (2017) Modelling of renting of metal in reverse zones in the course of internal grinding. STIN 9:29–33Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pereverzev PP, Akintseva AV (2016) Model of cutting force while managing two regime parameters in the process of internal grinding. Procedia Eng 150:1113–1117.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pereverzev PP, Akintseva AV (2016) Optimal internal grinding cycles in multidimensional control-parameter space. Russ Eng Res 36(11):974–978.  https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068798X16110174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Akintseva AV, Pereverzev PP (2017) Complex optimization of parameters for controlling the cycle of internal grinding by the method of dynamic programming. MATEC Web Conf 129:01019.  https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201712901019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rowe WB (2013) Principles of modern grinding technology. Elsevier, LiverpoolGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Horiuchi O, Shibata T (2007) Computer simulations of cylindrical plunge grinding—influence of work stiffness on grinding accuracy. Key Eng Mater 329:51–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhou SS, Petrosky GC (1997) Improving workpiece roundness through centerless grinding cycle optimization. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 460:217–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Inasaki I (1991) Monitoring and optimization of internal grinding process. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 400:359–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Onishi T, Ohashi K, Yamamoto Y, Sakakura M, Tsukamoto S (2011) Improvement of accuracy in internal grinding with shape modification on high aspect ratio wheel. Proc 6th Int Conf Lead Edge Manuf 21st Century 8:482–487Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Malkin S, Stephen D (1986) Practical grinding optimization, proceedings. Abras Eng Soc Conf/Exhib 180:93–103Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nishimura T, Inasaki I, Yamamoto N (1989) Study on optimization of internal grinding cycle. Trans Jpn Soc Mech Eng 55:1808–1813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Krishna AG, Rao KM (2006) Multi-objective optimisation of surface grinding operations using scatter search approach. J Adv Manuf Technol 29:475–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Krajinik P, Drazumeric R, Badger J, Hashimito F (2014) Cycle optimization in cam-lobe grinding for high productivity. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 630:333–336Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Salov PM, Vinogradova TG, Salova DP (2009) Managing of a circle rerun at internal grinding. High Technol Mashinostr 1:61–63Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mikhelkevich VN (1975) Automatic control of grinding. Mechanical Engineering, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jiang C, Li H, Mai Y, Guo D (2014) Material removal monitoring in precision cylindrical plunge grinding using acoustic emission signal. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 228(4):715–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Alvarez J (2012) Model-based assistant tool for the setting-up and optimization of centerless grinding process. Mach Sci Technol 16(4):501–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee CW (2009) Dynamic optimization of the grinding process in batch production. J Manuf Sci Eng Trans ASME 131:61–66Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Guo G, Malkin S (1990) Heat transfer in grinding. J Mater Process Manuf Sci 1:16–27Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. P. Pereverzev
    • 1
  • A. V. Akintseva
    • 1
  • M. K. Alsigar
    • 1
  1. 1.South Ural State UniversityChelyabinskRussia

Personalised recommendations