Advertisement

Assurance of Quality Indices of Technological Processes of Form-Shaping During Preproduction Stage

  • L. E. Shvartsburg
  • E. V. Butrimova
  • O. V. Yagolnitser
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

Quality indices of technological processes of form-shaping in general and of machining, in particular, determine to a large extent the competitiveness of these processes and play an essential role in assuring environmental and industrial safety. The most important quality indices of these technological processes are the indices characterizing vibrations and associated noise during the implementation of technological processes. Besides, from the point of view of safety, the issues related to the rational selection of LCTA are of considerable importance. To improve the safety of technological processes, these issues must be solved as early as at the preproduction stage. The issues of improving environmental and industrial safety of technological processes of form-shaping basing on the analysis of vibrations propagation, vibrations prediction, and also the methodology for rational selection of LCTA are discussed in the article. The mathematical models of propagation of vibrations in the structural components of the equipment were developed, and the problems of applying these models for the prediction of vibration levels at a preproduction stage are discussed. The issues of creating a comprehensive criterion for LCTA selection are considered, being a tool for rational selection of LCTA and of the systems for LCTA application. The developed information retrieval system “ECO LCTA” is presented, which includes the database and ensures rational selection of LCTA.

Keywords

Technological processes Form-shaping Safety Vibration LCTA Mathematical model Comprehensive criterion 

References

  1. 1.
    Shvartsburg L, Butrimova E, Yagolnitser O (2017) Quantitative evaluation of the effectiveness of best available technologies of form-shaping. In: MATEC web of conferences, vol 129, p 01027.  https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201712901027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Egorov SB, Kapitanov AV, Mitrofanov VG, Shvartsburg LE, Ivanova NA, Ryabov SA (2016) Formation of the integral ecological quality index of the technological processes in machine building based on their energy efficiency. Int J Environ Sci Educ 11(11):4065–4078Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shvartsburg LE, Ivanova NA, Ryabov SA, Zaborowski T (2014) Chemical contaminations in a process of polishing with an implementation of liquid LCTS. Life Sci J 11(10s):228–230Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gvozdkova SI, Shvartsburg LE (2017) Analysis of sources and methods for reducing noise by minimizing vibrations of engineering technological processes. Proc Eng 206:958–964.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rodriguez PE, Shvartsburg LE, Artemyeva MS (2017) Methodological design and commissioning of an experimental stand for the study of the spread of harmful substances in the air of work areas during the processing of metals in industry. Proc Eng 206:588–593.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Golubkov YU, Ermolaeva NV, Shwarzburg LE (2016) Nitrogen-bearing organic components of industrial oils. Chem Technol Fuels Oils 52:90–94.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10553-016-0677-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ivanova NA, Ryabov SA, Shvartsburg LE (2016) The role of information technology in rotor balancing. Russ Eng Res 36(3):235–238.  https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068798X16030096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shvartsburg LE, Butrimova EV, Yagolnitser OV (2017) Energy efficiency and ecological safety of shaping technological processes. Proc Eng 206:1009–1014.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zaborowski T, Shvartsburg LE, Konov SG (2016) Tracking navigation system based on photogrammetry principles. Mater Sci Forum 876:69–73.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.876.69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Egorov SB, Kapitanov AV, Mitrofanov VG, Shvartsburg LE, Ivanova NA, Ryabov SA (2016) Modern digital manufacturing technical support centers. Math Educ 11(7):2213–2225Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kapitanov AV (2016) Special characteristics of the multi-product manufacturing. Proc Eng 150:832–836.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kapitanov AV, Mitrofanov VG, Omel’chenko IS, Sirotkin OS (2015) The effect of reliability on the distribution of a production program among technological systems at an engineering enterprise. J Mach Manuf Reliab 44(7):646–649.  https://doi.org/10.3103/s1052618815070092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bukeikhanov NR, Gvozdkova SI, Nikishechkin AP (2017) Automation of the technological system “gas nitriding—recycling processes”. In: 2017 international conference on industrial engineering, applications and manufacturing (ICIEAM), IEEE, pp 1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1109/icieam.2017.8076447
  14. 14.
    Shvartsburg L, Zaborowski T, Cyplik P (2017) Situation of costs in the logistik process of enterprises. LogForum 13(4):495–506.  https://doi.org/10.17270/J.LOG.2017.4.9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Butrimova E, Yagolnitser O, Shvartsburg L (2017) Automation of management of ecological parameters of the technological processes of cutting on the basis of forecasting their negative impact on the person and environment. Int J Eng Sci Res Technol 6(11):379–383.  https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1054609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shvartsburg L, Vikharev A (2017) Performance management of local air purification systems. ecology and industry of Russia 21(1):4–7. (In Russian)  https://doi.org/10.18412/1816-0395-2017-1-4-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Egorov SB, Kapitanov AV, Loktev DA (2016) Modern methods and technological solutions for effective processing of gear wheels. Mater Sci Forum 870:397–403.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.870.397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shvartsburg LE, Zvenigorodskij UG, Bukeihanov NR (2011) Methodology of resource saving projects development. Vestnik MSTU “Stankin” 2:14–17Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gvozdkova SI, Shvartsburg LE (2012) Reduce of loss of energy by increase the coefficient of power. Vestnik MSTU “Stankin” 2:32–36Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shvartsburg L (2000) Formation of the ecological component in engineering education. In: 2nd global congress on engineering education, congress proceedings, pp 203–204. WOS:000089500800041Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Butrimova EV (2014) Automation of forecasting of levels of vibration in various points of constructional elements of metal-cutting machines. Pract Educ-Methodical J Life Saf 6(174):18–23Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Butrimova EV (2015) Evaluation of vibrations in metalcutters based on the linear law of their propagation. Ecol Ind Russ 19(3):18–21Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hudoshina MY, Butrimova OV (2015) A complex criterion for the evaluation of ecologically substantiated selection of LCAs and systems for their application. Ecol Ind Russ 19(5):46–49Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hudoshina MY, Butrimova OV (2014) Automation of ecologically reasonable choice of lubricant cooling technological means and systems of their application. Pract Educ-Methodical J Life Saf 1(90):19–21Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. E. Shvartsburg
    • 1
  • E. V. Butrimova
    • 1
  • O. V. Yagolnitser
    • 1
  1. 1.Moscow State Technological University “STANKIN”MoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations