Advertisement

Overhaul-Period Renewal of Cement Kiln Rotary Drive

  • Aleksei V. Antsupov
  • Alexander V. Antsupov
  • M. G. Slobodianskii
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

The article describes a sudden problem of unplanned failures of the kiln drive due to the destruction of the barb bolts of pillow block bolts. However, the evaluation of the bolts’ state according to the conditions of long-term strength did not confirm the loss of their operability. The model of gradual bolt failures has been developed using the kinetic approach to the destruction of structural materials and the thermodynamic condition for the solids strength in order to theoretically substantiate and solve the problem. The cause of the destruction in a barb bolts material was established after approximately 4-year operation on the basis of the theoretical analysis. Calculations showed that at the end of this lifetime the energy density of the material structure defects reaches a critical value corresponding to its melting enthalpy and leads to its destruction. The undertaken analysis made it possible to propose and justify two new design versions of the kiln rotary drive with almost complete unloading of the pillow block bolts. One of them is connected with the transfer of the drive to the opposite side; the other implies a direction change in the kiln rotation. The second version of the drive reconstruction turned out to be technically and economically feasible as well as the least prolonged. It is commissioned into commercial operation.

Keywords

Kiln Clinker Drive Barb bolt Damageability Resource Increase Reconstruction 

References

  1. 1.
    Goldebaev VP (2006) The rotary kiln is 4.5 × 125 m (wet method) with subsequent reconstruction to a 4.5 × 85 m furnace (dry method). Strength calculations, ZAO Volgotsemservis, Toljatti. (in Russian)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sorokin VG et al (2001) Steels and alloys. Database: reference. Intermet Inzhiniring, Moscow, p 608 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhurkov SN, Nurzullaev BN (1953) Time dependence of strength under various loading regimes. ZhTF 10:1677–1689 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cherepanov GP (1989) Mechanics of destruction and the kinetic theory of strength. Probl Strength 1:3–8 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Regel VR, Slutsker AI, Tomashevsky EE (1974) The kinetic nature of the strength of solids. The main edition of physics and mathematics literature published by Nauka Publishers (in Russian)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fedorov VV (1985) Kinetics of damage and destruction of solids. Publisher “Fan” UzSSR, Tashkent (in Russian)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pronikov AS (2002) Parametric reliability of machines. MSTU N.E. Bauman, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shashkin VV et al (1992) Reliability in mechanical engineering: Handbook. Polytechnics, SPb. (in Russian)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Antsupov AV, Antsupov VP (2013) Designed assessment of machine element reliability due to efficiency criteria. Vestnik of Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, pp 62–66Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kapur K et al (1980) Reliability and design of systems. Mir, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kogaev VP et al (1985) Calculations of machine parts and structures for strength and durability. Mechanical Engineering, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Antsupov AV et al (2015) Theory and practice of ensuring the reliability of machine parts by the criteria of kinetic strength and wear resistance of materials: monograph. Publishing house NMSTU, Magnitogorsk (in Russian)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ivanova VS (1992) Synergetics: strength and destruction of metallic materials. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fedorov VV et al (2014) Fundamentals of ergodynamics and synergetics of deformable bodies. Publishing House of the Federal State Educational Establishment of Higher Professional Education “KSTU”, Kaliningrad (in Russian)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Antsupov AV, Antsupov VP, Slobodianskii MG et al (2016) Energy-mechanical concept of the durability prediction of friction units on the wear resistance criterion of elements. J Frict Wear 494–499Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Antsupov AV, Antsupov AV Jr, Slobodyansky MG et al (2008) Structural-energy approach to the evaluation of frictional reliability of materials and machine parts. Materials of the 66th scientific-technical, pp 258–262 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fedorov VV (1979) Thermodynamic aspects of strength and fracture of solids. Publishing House “Fan” UzSSR, Tashkent (in Russian)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Antsupov AV, Antsupov AV, Antsupov VP (2017) Analytical method for project resource estimation of metallurgical machinery parts. Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenij. Chernaya Metallurgiya 62–66Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Antsupov VP, Dvornikov LT, Gromakovsky DG et al (2014) Fundamentals of the physical theory of reliability of machine parts by the criteria of kinetic strength of materials. Bull Nosov Moscow State Tech Univ 141–146 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Antsupov AV, Antsupov AV, Antsupov VP (2016) Estimation and assurance of machine component design lifetime. Procedia Eng 726–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aleksei V. Antsupov
    • 1
  • Alexander V. Antsupov
    • 1
  • M. G. Slobodianskii
    • 1
  1. 1.Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical UniversityMagnitogorskRussia

Personalised recommendations