Advertisement

Influence of Friction Geo-modifiers on HTHS Viscosity of Motor Oils

  • I. Levanov
  • E. Zadorozhnaya
  • D. Vichnyakov
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

Motor oil of the internal combustion engine is a means to deliver particles of friction geo-modifiers to the friction surfaces. In this case, the influence of friction geo-modifiers such an important parameter as engine oil HTHS viscosity is of practical interest. The purpose of this article is to determine the HTHS viscosity multigrade engine oils of SAE class 5W-40 with different concentrations of friction geo-modifiers on the basis of pure serpentine. The tapered bearing simulator TBS 2100E TANNAS was used to measure the viscosity of oils at shear rates 106 s−1. A lubricating composition was prepared using two samples of multigrade engine oils viscosity grade SAE 5W-40. The mass concentration of the friction geo-modifiers was 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5% in each sample. The friction geo-modifiers lead to insignificant decrease in HTHS viscosity multigrade engine oil of viscosity grade SAE 5W-40. The viscosity decreased on 3.5–6.5% for the analyzed samples of motor oils. Therefore, the working conditions of the bearings of the crankshaft are changed insignificantly at the introduction of the friction geo-modifiers in motor oil.

Keywords

Viscosity Friction geo-modifiers Serpentine Multigrade oil 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been carried out within financial support of Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project № 16-08-01020\16). The work was supported by Act 211 Government of the Russian Federation, contract № 02.A03.21.0011.

References

  1. 1.
    Usachev VV, Pogodaev LI, Teluh DM, Kuzmin VN (2010) Introduction in a problem of use of natural layered geomodifiers in pairs of friction. Frict Lubr Mach Mech 1:36–42Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Breki AD (2011) Tribological properties of modified lubricating oils. www.ipme.ru/ipme/edu/diss/albreki2011.pdf. Accessed 26 Feb 2017
  3. 3.
    Nigmatullin RG, Sholom BY, Shuster LS, Nigmatullin IM (2012) Improving the efficiency of lubricants with friction geomodificators. Bull USATU 16:51–56Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Medvedeva VV, Breki AD, Krylov NA, Skotnikova MA et al (2016) Investigation of antiwear properties of a plastic lubricating composite material containing dispersed particles of the layered friction modifier. In: Proceedings of the SouthWest State University technics and technologies vol 1, pp 75–82Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Medvedeva VV, Breki AD, Krylov NA, Aleksandrov SE et al (2016) Antiwear properties of a grease-lubricating composite material containing a mixture of hydrosilicates of magnesium. In: Proceedings of the SouthWest State University technics and technologies vol 2, pp 30–40Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davidov NA (2011) Nanotechnology antifriction powder composition (options), nanotechnology lubricating composition and method of lubrication nanotechnology. http://www.freepatent.ru/patents/2415176. Accessed 26 Feb 2017
  7. 7.
    Duradji VN, Kaputkin DE, Duradji A (2016) Tribological studies of antiwear antifriction composition and its application. Tribol Ind 38:496–507Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Medvedeva VV, Skotnikova MA, Breki AD et al (2015) Evaluation of the influence of particle size and concentration of powereds of rocks on the antiwear properties of liquid lubricant compositions. News of Tula State Univ, Tech Sci 11:57–65Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Levanov IG, Doykin AA, Zadorozhnaya EA, Novikov RI (2017) Investigation Antiwear properties of lubricants with the geo-modifiers of friction. Tribol Ind Med 39:302–306.  https://doi.org/10.24874/ti.2017.39.03.04CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    ASTM D4683-09 (2009) Simulator Viscometer at 150 °C1 standard test method for measuring viscosity of new and used engine oils at high shear rate and high temperature by tapered bearingGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smirnov SV, Trushina EB, Novikov RI, Novikova ER (2015) Solid lubricating composition. RU Patent 2553255, 10 July 2015Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Prokop’ev VN, Boyarshinova AK, Gavrilov KV (2009) Hydromechanical characteristics of complex-loaded siding bearing with allowance for nonroundness of the pivot shaft and bush. J Mach Manuf Reliab 38:393–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mukchortov I, Zadorozhnaya E, Levanov I, Pochkaylo K (2015) The influence of poly-molecular adsorption on the rheological behaviour of lubricating oil in a thin layer. FME Trans 43:218–222Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rozhdestvensky YV, Khozeniuk NA, Mylnikov AA (2016) The technique of an interconnection problem of the hydrodynamic lubrication theory and the nonlinear dynamics for mechanical systems “an elastic crankshaft on journal bearings”. Proc Eng 150:647–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gritsenko A, Plaksin A, Shepelev V (2017) Studying lubrication system of turbocompressor rotor with integrated electronic control. Proc Eng 206:611–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zadorozhnaya E, Sibiryakov S, Hudyakov V (2017) Theoretical and experimental investigations of the rotor vibration amplitude of the turbocharger and bearings temperature. Tribol Ind 39:452–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.South Ural State University (National Research University)ChelyabinskRussia

Personalised recommendations