Advertisement

Introduction

  • Daniela Caterina
Chapter
Part of the Contributions to Political Science book series (CPS)

Abstract

This chapter introduces the book as the result of a search process merging empirical and theoretical-methodological concerns. How to locate the project in the literature? What does it mean to adopt the suggested perspective on the Italian case? How is this achieved? What does this imply for critical policy analyses beyond the Italian case? In order to answer these questions, the chapter puts the book in its place in the current state of research and presents cultural political economy as its overarching research programme. It follows a discussion of its core research interest in the Italian political economy and in the development of a transdisciplinary research framework focused on the specific strategic aspect of hegemony struggles, before concluding with an overview of the book structure.

References

  1. Amable, B. (2003). The diversity of modern capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Amable, B., & Palombarini, S. (2005). L’économie politique n’est pas une science morale. Paris: Raisons d’agir.Google Scholar
  3. Amable, B., & Palombarini, S. (2009). A neorealist approach to institutional change and the diversity of capitalism. Socio-Economic Review, 7(1), 123–143.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwn018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amable, B., & Palombarini, S. (2014). The bloc bourgeois in France and Italy. In H. Magara (Ed.), Economic crises and policy regimes (pp. 177–216). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  5. Amable, B., Guillaud, E., & Palombarini, S. (2011). The political economy of neo-liberalism in Italy and France. CES Working Papers (Vol. 51). Paris: Centre d’Économie de la Sorbonne (CES).Google Scholar
  6. Amable, B., Guillaud, E., & Palombarini, S. (2012). L’économie politique du néolibéralisme – Le cas de la France et de l’Italie. Paris: Éditions Rue d’Ulm.Google Scholar
  7. Ascoli, U., & Pavolini, E. (Eds.). (2015). The Italian welfare state in a European perspective – a comparative analysis. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  8. Becker, J., & Jäger, J. (2012). Integration in crisis: A regulationist perspective on the interaction of European varieties of capitalism. Competition and Change, 16(3), 169–187.  https://doi.org/10.1179/10245294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bieling, H.-J. (2011a). Vom Krisenmanagement zur neuen Konsolidierungsagenda der EU. PROKLA, 163(2), 173–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bieling, H.-J. (2011b). Eine gemeinsame europäische Krisenüberwindungsstrategie – Probleme und Perspektiven. In Europa – quo vadis? (pp. 69–92).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92805-0_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bieling, H.-J. (2013). Die Krise der Europäischen Union aus der Perspektive einer neo-gramscianisch erweiterten Regulationstheorie. In R. Atzmüller, J. Becker, U. Brand, L. Oberndorfer, V. Redak, & T. Sablowski (Eds.), Fit für die Krise? Perspektiven der Regulationstheorie (pp. 309–328). Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.Google Scholar
  12. Bieling, H.-J., & Brand, U. (2015). Competitiveness or emancipation? Rethinking regulation and (counter-)hegemony in times of capitalist crisis. In R. Westra, D. Badeen, & R. Albritton (Eds.), The future of capitalism after the financial crisis. The varieties of capitalism debate in the age of austerity (pp. 184–204). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Brand, U. (2013). State, context and correspondence. Contours of a historical-materialist policy analysis. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 42(4), 425–442.Google Scholar
  14. Buckel, S., Georgi, F., Kannankulam, J., & Wissel, J. (2012). …wenn das Alte nicht stirbt und das Neue nicht zur Welt kommen kann. Kräfteverhältnisse in der europäischen Krise. In F. S. Europa (Ed.), Die EU in der Krise: zwischen autoritärem Etatismus und europäischem Frühling (pp. 11–48). Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.Google Scholar
  15. Buckel, S., Georgi, F., Kannankulam, J., & Wissel, J. (2014). Staat, Europa und Migrationskontrollen: theoretische Grundlagen einer materialistische Perspektive. In F. S. Europa (Ed.), Kämpfe um Migrationspolitik: Theorie, Methode und Analysen kritischer Europaforschung (pp. 22–41). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
  16. Calza Bini, P. (2003). The Italian welfare system between the European unification and the globalization processes: A suggested interpretation. In M. Di Matteo & P. Piacentini (Eds.), The Italian economy at the dawn of the 21st century (pp. 334–353). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  17. Caterina, D. (2018). Investigating hegemony struggles: Transdisciplinary considerations on the role of a critical discourse analysis of practical argumentation. Critical Discourse Studies, 15(3), 211–227.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2017.1398670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cerny, P. G. (1997). Paradoxes of the competition state: The dynamics of political globalization. Government and Opposition, 32(2), 251–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cerny, P. G. (2010). The competition state today: From raison d’État to raison du monde. Policy Studies, 31(1), 5–21.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01442870903052801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. De Cecco, M. (2007). Italy’s dysfunctional political economy. West European Politics, 30(4), 763–783.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380701500280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Della Sala, V. (2004). The Italian model of capitalism: On the road between globalization and Europeanization? Journal of European Public Policy, 11(6), 1041–1057.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176042000298093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dingeldey, I. (2007). Between workfare and enablement. The different paths to transformation of the welfare state: A comparative analysis of activating labour market policies. European Journal of Political Research, 46(6), 823–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dingeldey, I., & Rothgang, H. (2009). Introduction: Governance and comparative welfare state research. In I. Dingeldey & H. Rothgang (Eds.), Governance of welfare state reform. A cross national and cross sectoral comparison of policy and politics (pp. 1–68). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  24. Evans, M., & Lunt, N. (2010). Understanding competition states. Policy Studies, 31(1), 1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01442870903399111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  26. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  27. Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fairclough, N. (2006). Language and globalization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis and critical policy studies. Critical Policy Studies, 7(2), 177–197.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2013.798239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fairclough, I., & Fairclough, N. (2012). Political discourse analysis: A method for advanced students. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Ferrera, M. (1984). Il welfare state in Italia. Sviluppo e crisi in prospettiva comparata. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  32. Ferrera, M. (1996). The ‘Southern Model’ of welfare in social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 6(1), 17–37.  https://doi.org/10.1177/095892879600600102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ferrera, M., & Gualmini, E. (2000). Le riforme guidate dal consenso: lavoro e previdenza. In G. Di Palma, S. Fabbrini, & G. Freddi (Eds.), Condannata al successo? L’Italia nell’Europa integrata (pp. 245–285). Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  34. Ferrera, M., & Gualmini, E. (2004). Rescued by Europe? Social and labour market reforms in Italy from Maastricht to Berlusconi. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fischer, F., & Forester, J. (1993). The argumentative turn in policy analysis. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Fischer, F., & Gottweis, H. (Eds.). (2012). The argumentative turn revisited: Public policy as communicative practice. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Georgi, F., & Kannankulam, J. (2015). Kräfteverhältnisse in der Eurokrise: Konfliktdynamiken im bundesdeutschen “Block an der Macht”. PROKLA, 180, 349–369.Google Scholar
  38. Graziano, P. (2004). From a guaranteed labour market to the “flexible worker” model? The transformation of Italian unemployment policy in the ‘90s. In Les Cahiers européens de Sciences Po (Vol. 4). Paris: Centre d’études européennes at Sciences Po.Google Scholar
  39. Gualmini, E. (1996). Policy innovation in the Italian labour market: The influence of institutions (Vol. Discussion Paper FS, pp. 96–304). Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung.Google Scholar
  40. Gualmini, E., & Schmidt, V. A. (2013). State transformation in Italy and France: Technocratic versus political leadership on the road from non-liberalism to neo-liberalism. In V. A. Schmidt & M. Thatcher (Eds.), Resilient liberalism in Europe’s political economy (pp. 346–373). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hall, P. A. (2012). The economics and politics of the euro crisis. German Politics, 21(4), 355–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001). An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In P. A. Hall & D. Soskice (Eds.), Varieties of capitalism (pp. 1–68). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hancké, B., Rhodes, M., & Thatcher, M. (2007). Introduction: Beyond varieties of capitalism. In B. Hancké, M. Rhodes, & M. Thatcher (Eds.), Beyond varieties of capitalism. Conflict, contradictions, and complementarities in the European economy (pp. 3–38). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Heinrich, M. (2012). Zwischen Bankenrettungen und autoritärem Wettbewerbsregime. Zur Dynamik ds Europäischen Krisenmanagements. PROKLA, 168(3), 395–412.Google Scholar
  45. Heinrich, M., & Jessop, B. (2013). Die EU-Krise aus der Sicht der Kulturellen Politischen Ökonomie – Krisendeutungen und ihre Umsetzung. Das Argument, 301, 19–33.Google Scholar
  46. Hirsch, J. (1998). Vom Sicherheits- zum nationalen Wettbewerbsstaat. Berlin: ID Verlag.Google Scholar
  47. Hirsch, J. (2001). Die Internationalisierung des Staates: Anmerkungen zu einigen aktuellen Fragen der Staatstheorie. In J. Hirsch, B. Jessop, & N. Poulantzas (Eds.), Die Zukunft des Staates: Denationalisierung, Internationalisierung, Renationalisierung (pp. 101–138). Hamburg: VSA-Verlag.Google Scholar
  48. Jackson, G., & Deeg, R. (2012). The long-term trajectories of institutional change in European capitalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(8), 1109–1125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jessop, B. (1986). Der Wohlfahrtsstaat im Übergang von Fordismus zum Postfordismus. PROKLA, 16(65), 4–33.Google Scholar
  50. Jessop, B. (1991). The welfare state in the transition from Fordism to post-Fordism. In B. Jessop, H. Kastendiek, K. Nielsen, & O. K. Pedersen (Eds.), The politics of flexibility: Restructuring state and industry in Britain, Germany and Scandinavia (pp. 82–105). Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  51. Jessop, B. (1993). Towards a Schumpeterian workfare state? Preliminary remarks on post-Fordist political economy. Studies in Political Economy, 40, 7–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Jessop, B. (2002). The future of the capitalist state. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  53. Jessop, B. (2004). Critical semiotic analysis and cultural political economy. Critical Discourse Studies, 1(2), 159–174.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900410001674506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Jessop, B. (2010). Cultural political economy and critical policy studies. Critical Policy Studies, 3(3–4), 336–356.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171003619741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Jessop, B. (2012). Crossing boundaries: Towards cultural political economy. Interview with Bob Jessop. In A. Labrousse, T. Lamarche, & J. Vercueil (Eds.), Revue de la régulation (Vol. 12).  https://doi.org/10.4000/regulation.9943, http://journals.openedition.org/regulation/9943
  56. Jessop, B. (2013). Recovered imaginaries, imagined recoveries: A cultural political economy of crisis construals and crisis management in the North Atlantic financial crisis. In M. Benner (Ed.), Before and beyond the global economic crisis – economics, politics and settlement (pp. 234–254). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Jessop, B., & Sum, N.-L. (2001). Pre-disciplinary and post-disciplinary perspectives. New Political Economy, 6(1), 89–101.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13563460020027777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kalinowski, E. (2013). Regulating international finance and the diversity of capitalism. Socioeconomic Review, 11(3), 471–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kannankulam, J., & Georgi, F. (2012). Die europäische Integration als materielle Verdichtung von Kräfteverhältnissen: Hegemonieprojekte im Kampf um das “Staatsprojekt Europa”. Working paper of the Forschungsgruppe Europäische integration, FEI (Vol. Nr. 30). Marburg: Institut für Politikwissenschaft, Fachbereich Gesellschaftswissenschaft und Philosophie, Philipps-Universität Marburg.Google Scholar
  60. Kannankulam, J., & Georgi, F. (2014). Varieties of capitalism or varieties of relationships of forces? Outlines of a historical materialist policy analysis. Capital & Class, 38(1), 59–71.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0309816813513088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Konecny, M. (2012). Die Herausbildung einer neuen Economic Governance als Strategie zur autoritären Krisenbearbeitung in Europa – Gesellschaftliche Akteure und ihre Strategien. PROKLA, 168(3), 377–394.Google Scholar
  62. Molina, O., & Rhodes, M. (2007a). Industrial relations and the welfare state in Italy: Assessing the potential of negotiated change. West European Politics, 30(4), 803–829.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380701500314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Molina, O., & Rhodes, M. (2007b). The political economy of adjustment in mixed market economies: A study of Spain and Italy. In B. Hancké, M. Rhodes, & M. Thatcher (Eds.), Beyond varieties of capitalism. Conflict, contradictions, and complementarities in the European economy (pp. 223–252). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Oberndorfer, L. (2012). Hegemoniekrise in Europa – Auf dem Weg zu einem autoritären Wettbewerbsetatismus? In F. S. Europa (Ed.), Die EU in der Krise. Zwischen autoritärem Etatismus und europäischem Frühling (pp. 50–71). Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.Google Scholar
  65. Palombarini, S. (2001). La rupture du compromis social italien. Paris: CNRS Editions.Google Scholar
  66. Palombarini, S. (2003). Dalla crisi politica alla crisis sistemica. Interessi sociali e mediazione pubblica nell’Italia contemporanea. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
  67. Palombarini, S. (2009). La France et l’Italie dans la tempête. PRO, 309(2), 51.  https://doi.org/10.3917/pro.309.0051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Peck, J. (1996). Work-place: The social regulation of labor markets. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  69. Peck, J. (2001). Workfare states. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  70. Peck, J. (2003). The rise of the workfare state. Kurswechsel, 3, 75–87.Google Scholar
  71. Picot, G., & Tassinari, A. (2014). Liberalization, dualization, or recalibration? Labor market reforms under austerity, Italy and Spain 2010–2012 (Working Paper Series in Politics). Oxford: Nuffield College. https://www.nuffield.ox.ac.uk/media/1741/picottassinari-labor-market-reforms-under-austerity.pdf
  72. Rangone, M., & Solari, S. (2012). From the southern-European model to nowhere: The evolution of Italian capitalism, 1976–2011. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(8), 1188–1206.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2012.709014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rausei, P., & Tiraboschi, M. (Eds.). (2012a). Lavoro: una riforma a metà del guado. Prime osservazioni sul DDL n. 3249/2012, Disposizioni in materia di riforma del mercato del lavoro in una prospettiva di crescita. Modena: ADAPT University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Rausei, P., & Tiraboschi, M. (Eds.). (2012b). Lavoro: una riforma sbagliata. Ulteriori osservazioni sul DDL n.5256/2012, Disposizioni in materia di riforma del mercato del lavoro in una prospettiva di crescita. Modena: ADAPT University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Regini, M. (1995). Uncertain boundaries: The social and political construction of European economies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sacchi, S. (2013). Italy’s labour policy and policymaking in the crisis: From distributive coalitions to the shadow of hierarchy. In H. Magara & S. Sacchi (Eds.), The politics of structural reforms: Social and industrial policy chance in Italy and Japan (pp. 192–214). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  77. Sacchi, S., & Vesan, P. (2011). Interpreting employment policy changes in Italy since the 1990s: Nature and dynamics. In Carlo Alberto notebooks (Vol. 228). Turin: Collegio Carlo Alberto.Google Scholar
  78. Sacchi, S., & Vesan, P. (2015). Employment policy: Segmentation, deregulation and reforms in the Italian labour market. In U. Ascoli & E. Pavolini (Eds.), The Italian welfare state in a European perspective – a comparative analysis (pp. 71–99). Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sapelli, G. (1995). Southern Europe since 1945. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  80. Schmidt, V. A. (2002). Does discourse matter in the politics of welfare state adjustment? Comparative Political Studies, 35(2), 168–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Schmidt, V. A. (2006). Democracy in Europe: The EU and national polities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 303–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Schmidt, V. A. (2010). Taking ideas and discourse seriously: Explaning change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth “new institutionalism”. European Political Science Review, 2(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Schmidt, V. A. (2012). What happened to the state-influenced market economies (SMEs)? France, Italy and Spain confront the crisis as the good, the bad and the ugly. In W. Grant & G. K. Wilson (Eds.), The consequences of the global financial crisis: The rhetoric of reform and regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Schmidt, V. A., & Gualmini, E. (2013). The political sources of Italy’s economic problems: Between opportunistic political leadership and pragmatic, technocratic leadership. Comparative European Politics, 11(3), 360–382.  https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2012.44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Simonazzi, A., Villa, P., Lucidi, F., & Naticchioni, P. (2008). Continuity and change in the Italian model: Italy’s laborious convergence towards the European social model. Rome: Università degli Studi di Roma “La Sapienza”.Google Scholar
  87. Sum, N.-L., & Jessop, B. (2013). Towards a cultural political economy. Putting culture in its place in political economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniela Caterina
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Social SciencesUniversity of HamburgHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations