Advertisement

Failed Fieldwork in Senegal: Give Up or Continue?

  • Elizaveta Volkova
Chapter

Abstract

Beginning with a discussion around the lack of attention in the literature to honest accounts of failed fieldwork, in this chapter Elizaveta Volkova shares her experience with issues of access that led her to believe that her research was failing. During a particularly unproductive field trip to Senegal to research joking relations among the Joola people, Volkova discovered that admitting to yourself that things are not working and giving yourself time to evaluate why things might be going wrong potentially opens up a whole range of possibilities and possible solutions to anxieties and feelings of failure. She concludes that one of the strategies for successful fieldwork is admitting to yourself that feelings of failure are often par for the course for a novice researcher.

Keywords

Senegal Access Failure Gatekeepers Joking relations 

References

  1. Agyeman, D. (2005). Methodological Lessons: Working with Liberian and Togolese Refugees in Ghana. In E. Porter, G. Robinson, M. Smyth, A. Schnabel, & E. Osaghae (Eds.), Researching Conflict in Africa: Insights and Experiences (pp. 56–63). Tokyo: United Nations University.Google Scholar
  2. Aspen, H. (1991). A Novice’s Field Experience. In M. Zamora & B. Erring (Eds.), Fieldwork in Cultural Anthropology (pp. 97–110). New Delhi: Reliance Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Davis, S. H. (2011). Introduction: Becoming Human. In S. H. Davis & M. Konner (Eds.), Being There. Learning to Live Cross-Culturally (pp. 1–7). Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Diédhiou, P. (2013). La gestion du conflit de Casamance: Abdoulaye Wade et la “tradition” joola. In M.-C. Diop (Dir.), Le Sénégal sous Abdoulaye Wade: Le Sopi à l’épreuve du pouvoir (pp. 249–265). Dakar and Paris: Cres-Karthala.Google Scholar
  5. Jemielniak, D., & Kostera, M. (2010). Narratives of Irony and Failure in Ethnographic Work. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, 27(4), 335–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kovats-Bernat, J. C. (2002). Negotiating Dangerous Fields: Pragmatic Strategies for Fieldwork Amid Violence and Terror. American Anthropologist, 104(1), 208–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. McFadyen, J., & Rankin, J. (2016). The Role of Gatekeepers in Research: Learning from Reflexivity and Reflection. GSTF Journal of Nursing and Health Care, 4(1), 82–88.Google Scholar
  8. Molony, T., & Hammett, D. (2007). The Friendly Financier: Talking Money with the Silenced Assistant. Human Organization, 66(3), 292–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nairn, K., Munro, J., & Smith, A. B. (2005). A Counter-Narrative of a “Failed” Interview. Qualitative Research, 5(2), 221–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nilan, P. (2002). “Dangerous Fieldwork” Re-examined: The Question of Researcher Subject Position. Qualitative Research, 2(3), 363–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Olawale, I. (2005). Applying Social Work Practice to the Study of Ethnic Militias: The Oduduwa People’s Congress in Nigeria. In E. Porter, G. Robinson, M. Smyth, A. Schnabel, & E. Osaghae (Eds.), Researching Conflict in Africa: Insights and Experiences (pp. 64–89). Tokyo: United Nations University.Google Scholar
  12. Pollard, A. (2009). Field of Screams: Difficulty and Ethnographic Fieldwork. Anthropology Matters, 11(2). https://www.anthropologymatters.com/index.php/anth_matters/article/view/10/10. Accessed January 10, 2018.
  13. Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1940). On Joking Relationships. Africa: Journal of the International African Institute, 13(3), 195–210.Google Scholar
  14. Salamone, F. A. (1991). Friends in the Field. In M. D. Zamora & B. B. Erring (Eds.), Fieldwork in Cultural Anthropology (pp. 67–78). New Delhi: Reliance Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Smith, E. (2006). La nation “par le côté”. Le récit des cousinages au Sénégal. Cahiers d’études africaines, 184, 907–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Suzuki, Y. (2004). Negotiations, Concessions, and Adaptations During Fieldwork in a Tribal Society. Iranian Studies, 37(4), 623–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Temple, T., & Edwards, R. (2002). Interpreters/Translators and Cross-Language Research: Reflexivity and Border Crossings. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Thiongane, O. (2013). Anthropologie de la méningite au Niger: Espaces épidémiques, mobilisations scientifiques et conceptions de la maladie, Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, pp. 106–139.Google Scholar
  19. Thomson, S. (2009). “That is Not What We Authorised You to Do… ”: Access and Government Interference in Highly Politicised Research Environments. In C. Lekha Sriram, J. C. King, J. A. Mertus, O. Martin-Ortega, & J. Herman (Eds.), Surviving Field Research: Working in Violent and Difficult Situations (pp. 108–123). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Thomson, S., Ansoms, A., & Murison, J. (2013). Introduction: Why Stories behind the Findings? In S. Thomson, A. Ansoms, & J. Murison (Eds.), Emotional and Ethical Challenges for Field Research in Africa: The Story behind the Findings (pp. 1–11). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar
  21. Wanat, C. L. (2008). Getting Past the Gatekeepers: Differences Between Access and Cooperation in Public School Research. Field Methods, 20(2), 191–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizaveta Volkova
    • 1
  1. 1.Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, Institut des mondes africainsParisFrance

Personalised recommendations