Advertisement

Landscapes of Desire: The Effect of Gender, Sexualized Identity, and Flirting on Data Production in Rwanda and Zimbabwe

  • Lyn Johnstone
Chapter

Abstract

The chapter looks at the effects of sexualized identity and desire on the process of data production through a discussion of flirting in the field. In an attempt to generate new insights into different gender and power dynamics during the research process, as well as illustrate the effect that these dynamics might have on the type as well as the amount of data we produce and collect, Lyn Johnstone offers four glimpses into ways in which she encountered and reciprocated flirtatious banter directed by my male interviewees during fieldwork encounters in Rwanda and Zimbabwe. Exploring the role that agency, power, and performance play in such flirtatious encounters, the chapter discusses the ways in which flirtation can both impede and facilitate data production.

Keywords

Positionality Zimbabwe Flirting Gender Sexuality 

References

  1. Ackerly, B., Stern, M., & True, J. (Eds.). (2006). Feminist Methodologies for International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Agar, M. (2006). An Ethnography by Any Other Name. Forum: Qualitative Social Research Socialforschung, 7(4). http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/177. Accessed December 15, 2017.
  3. Arendell, T. (1997). Reflections on the Researcher-Researched Relationship: A Woman Interviewing Men. Qualitative Sociology, 20, 341–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell, D. (1995). [Screw]ing Geography (Censor’s Version). Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 13, 127–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell, D. (2007). Fucking Geography, Again. In K. Browne, J. Lim, & G. Brown (Eds.), Geographies of Sexualities: Theory, Practices and Politics (pp. 81–88). Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  6. Binnie, J. (1997). Coming out of Geography: Towards a Queer Epistemology? Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 15, 223–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Caplan, P. (1993). Learning Gender: Fieldwork in a Tanzanian Coastal Village, 1965–85. In D. Bell, P. Caplan, & W. J. Karim (Eds.), Gendered Fields: Women, Men and Ethnography (pp. 168–181). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Chattopadhyay, S. (2013). Getting Personal While Narrating the “Field”: A Researchers Journey to the Villages of the Narmada Valley. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 20(2), 137–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark, I., & Grant, A. (2015). Sexuality and Danger in the Field: Starting an Uncomfortable Conversation. Journal of the Anthropological Society of Oxford, 7(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
  11. Cupples, J. (2002). The Field as a Landscape of Desire: Sex and Sexuality in Geographical Fieldwork. Area, 34(4), 382–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diprose, G., Thomas, A. C., & Rushton, R. (2013). Desiring More: Complicating Understandings of Sexuality in Research Processes. Area, 45(3), 292–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. England, K. (1994). Getting Personal: Refexivity, Positionality, and Feminist Research. Professional Geographer, 46(1), 80–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gallagher, J. (2016). Interviews as Catastrophic Encounters: An Object Relations Methodology for IR Research. International Studies Perspectives, 17(4), 445–461.Google Scholar
  15. Gibson-Graham, J. K. (1994). “Stuffed If I Know!”: Reflections on Post-modern Feminist Social Research. Gender, Place and Culture, 1, 205–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gilbert, M. R. (1994). The Politics of Location: Doing Feminist Research “At Home”. Professional Geographer, 46, 90–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gilchrist, V. J. (1999). Key Informant Interviews. In B. F. Crabtree & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing Qualitative Research (pp. 70–89). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Grenz, S. (2005). Intersections of Sex and Power in Research on Prostitution: A Female Researcher Interviewing Male Heterosexual Clients. Signs, 30(4), 2091–2113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haraway, D. J. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jacoby, T. (2006). From the Trenches: Dilemmas of Feminist IR Fieldwork. In B. Ackerly, M. Stern, & J. True (Eds.), Feminist Methodologies for International Relations (pp. 153–173). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaspar, H., & Landolt, S. (2016). Flirting in the Field: Shifting Positionalities and Power Relations in Innocuous Sexualisations of Research Encounters. Gender, Place and Culture, 23(1), 107–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Martin, P. Y. (2003). “Said and Done” Versus “Saying and Doing”: Gendering Practices, Practicing Gender at Work. Gender and Society, 17(3), 342–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mattingly, D., & Falconer-Al-Hindi, K. (1995). Should Women Count? A Context for the Debate. Professional Geographer, 47, 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McDowell, L. (1988). Coming in From the Dark Feminist Research in Geography. In J. Eyles (Ed.), Research in Human Geography (pp. 154–173). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  25. McDowell, L. (1992). Doing Gender: Feminism, Feminists and Research Methods in Human Geography. Transactions. Institute of British Geographers, 17, 399–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moreno, E. (1995). Rape in the Field: Reflections From a Survivor. In D. Kulick & M. Wilson (Eds.), Taboo: Sex, Identity and Erotic Subjectivity in Immersed Anthropological Fieldwork (pp. 219–250). London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Morton, H. (1995). My Chastity Belt: Avoiding Seduction in Tonga. In D. Kulick & M. Wilson (Eds.), Taboo: Sex, Identity and Erotic Subjectivity in Anthropological Fieldwork (pp. 168–185). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nast, H. J. (1994). Opening Remarks on “Women in the Field”. Professional Geographer, 46, 54–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Newton, E. (1993). My Best Informant’s Dress: The Erotic Equation in Fieldwork. Cultural Anthropology, 8, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Parr, H. (1996). Mental Health, Ethnography and the Body: Implications for Geographical Research. Paper Presented at a Conference on Feminist Methodologies, Nottingham.Google Scholar
  31. Rose, G. (1997). Situating Knowledges: Positionality, Reflexivities and Other Tactics. Progress in Human Geography, 21(3), 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sundberg, J. (2003). Masculinist Epistemologies and the Politics of Fieldwork in Latin Americanist Geography. The Professional Geographer, 55(2), 180–190.Google Scholar
  33. Valentine, G. (2002). People Like Us: Negotiating Sameness and Difference in the Research Process. In P. Moss (Ed.), Feminist Geography in Practice: Research and Methods (pp. 116–126). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lyn Johnstone
    • 1
  1. 1.Royal Holloway, University of LondonEghamUK

Personalised recommendations