Advertisement

Conclusion

  • Patrick Kiernan
Chapter

Abstract

The conclusion provides a reflective overview of the book and attempts to draw out key findings from the book as a whole while considering how the inevitable shortcomings of this single project could lead into further research into translingual identity. It offers an evaluation of the methodology outlined and proposes new directions for research in the three perspectives on multimodal research into spoken discourse: ideational, interpersonal and textual. It also summarises the notion of spectrum of translingual identity proposed in this book and the related idea of a translingual community and indicates direction for further research. Finally, it concludes that the perspective taken in this book of exploring translingual identity as a multimodal construct should help better understand the multidimensional nature of language learning.

References

  1. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1992. Language and Symbolic Power. Trans. Gino Raymond. Ed. Matthew Adamson. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  2. Harré, Rom, and Fathali Moghaddam, eds. 2003. The Self and Others: Positioning Individuals and Groups in Personal, Political and Cultural Contexts. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  3. Harré, Rom, and Luk Van Langenhove, eds. 1999. Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of Intentional Action. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Honna, Noboyuki. 2002. The Encyclopedia of the English Language Situation in Asia: For Smooth Communication in the Global Age. Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.Google Scholar
  5. Jenkins, Jennifer. 2007. English as a Lingua Franca: Attitude and Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Kanno, Yasuko. 2008. Language and Education in Japan: Unequal Access to Bilingualism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kendon, Adam. 2004. Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kiernan, Patrick. 2010. Narrative Identity in English Language Learning: Towards a Research Agenda. The Bulletin of Arts and Sciences Meiji University 457: 23–42.Google Scholar
  9. Kress, Gunther, Carey Jewitt, Jon Ogborn, and Tsatsarelis Charalampos. 2001. Multimodal Teaching and Learning: The Rhetorics of the Science Classroom. Bloomsbury: London.Google Scholar
  10. Martin, J.R., and Peter R.R. White. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ochs, Elinor, and Lisa Capps. 2001. Living Narrative: Creating Lives in Everyday Storytelling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Sinclair, John, and Malcolm Coulthard. 1992. Towards an Analysis of Discourse. In Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis, ed. Malcolm Coulthard, 1–34. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Streeck, Jürgen. 2009. Gesturecraft: The Manufacturing of Meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. White, Peter R.R. 2005. Appraisal Website Homepage: http://www.grammatics.com/appraisal/index.html. Verbosity Enterprises.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrick Kiernan
    • 1
  1. 1.KenkyutoMeiji UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations