Advertisement

You Don’t Have to Live Like a Refugee: Consumer Culture at the Nineteenth-Century Refugee Village at Tikal, Guatemala

  • James Meierhoff
Chapter
Part of the Contributions To Global Historical Archaeology book series (CGHA)

Abstract

In the mid-nineteenth century Maya refugees fleeing the violence of the Caste War of Yucatan (1847–1901) briefly reoccupied the ancient ruins of Tikal. Unlike the numerous Yucatec refugee communities established to the east in British Honduras, those who settled at Tikal combined with Lacandon Maya, and later Ladinos from Lake Petén-Itza to form a multiethnic village in the sparsely occupied Petén jungle of northern Guatemala. This chapter discusses the analysis of the mass-produced nineteenth century consumer goods found at Tikal. The historic inhabitants of Tikal were well connected to exchange networks of the societies encircling the Petén, reaching the world through the global markets emanating from nearby British Honduras. This small village was poised to renegotiate social and economic relationships with peripheral societies from deep within the frontier zone and may be demonstrating consumer behavior observed in refugee populations in the modern era.

Keywords

Refugees Maya Guatemala Tikal Caste War of Yucatan 

References

  1. Adams, R., & Trik, A. (1961). Tikal report no. 7. Temple I (SIR. 5D-1): Post-constructional activities. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology.Google Scholar
  2. Antochiw, M. (1997). The peace treaties of Chichanha. Saastun, 2, 83–112.Google Scholar
  3. Birks, S. (2017a). A–Z of stoke-on-trent potters. Wileman and Co. Retrieved December, 2017, from http://www.thepotteries.org/allpotters/1083.htm
  4. Birks, S. (2017b). A–Z of stoke-on-trent potters. Thomas and James Bevington. Retrieved December, 2017, from http://www.thepotteries.org/allpotters/98.htm
  5. Boddam-Whatham, J. (1877). Across Central America. Victoria: Leopold Classic Library.Google Scholar
  6. Bolland, N. O. (1977). The formation of a colonial society: Belize from conquest to crown colony. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bolland, N. O. (1988). The Maya and the colonization of Belize in the nineteenth century. In N. Bolland (Ed.), Colonialism and resistance in Belize (pp. 91–124). Benque Viejo: Cubola.Google Scholar
  8. Bonorden, B., & Houk, B. (2016). Archaeological investigations at Kaxil Uinic and Qualm Hill, two colonial period sites in northwestern Belize. Research Reports in Belizean Archaeology, 13, 337–347.Google Scholar
  9. Brooks, A. (2015). The importance of British material culture to historical archaeologies of the nineteenth century. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cal, A. (1991). Capital-labor relations on a colonial frontier: Nineteenth-century northern Belize). In J. Brannon & G. Joseph (Eds.), Land, labor, and capital in modern Yucatan: Essays in regional history and political economy (pp. 83–106). Tuscaloosa, AL: The University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
  11. Church, M., Yaeger, J., & Dornan, J. (2010). The San Pedro Maya and the British colonial enterprise in British Honduras. In M. Liebman & M. Murphey (Eds.), Enduring conquests: Rethinking the archaeology of resistance to Spanish colonialism in the Americas (pp. 173–198). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
  12. Coe, M., & Shook, E. (1961). Tikal report no. 6, The carved wooden lintels of Tikal. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology.Google Scholar
  13. Dornan, J. (2004). “Even by night we only become aware they are killing us”; agency, identity, and intentionality at San Pedro Belize (1857–1930). Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  14. Dumond, D. (1997). The machete and the cross. Omaha, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  15. Elverson, M. (2014). A smoker’s delight: An analysis of English tobacco pipe bowls from St. Georges Caye, Belize. In J. Garber (Ed.), The St. George’s Caye archaeology project: Results of the 2013 field season (pp. 20–31). Belmopan: Institute of Archaeology.Google Scholar
  16. Gann, T. (1927). Maya cities. London: Camelot Press.Google Scholar
  17. Garber, J. (Ed.). (2014). The St. George’s Caye archaeology project: Results of the 2013 field season. Belmopan: Institute of Archaeology Belmopan.Google Scholar
  18. Garland, J. (2017). Odds and ends: Christchurch uncovered, Retrieved February 10, from http://blog.underoverarch.co.nz/2017/02/odds-and-ends-2/
  19. Hammond, N. (1984). Nineteenth-century drawings of Maya monuments in the Society’s library. Antiquaries Journal, 64, 84–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harrell-Bond, B., & Voutira, E. (1992). Anthropology and the study of refugees. Anthropology Today, 8(4), 6–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hill, J. (Ed.). (1996). History, power, and identity: Ethnogenesis in the Americas (pp. 1492–1992). Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Press.Google Scholar
  22. Jones, G. (1977). Levels of settlement alliance among the San Pedro Maya of western Belize and eastern Petén, 1857–1936. In G. Jones (Ed.), Anthropology and history in Yucatan (pp. 139–190). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  23. Jones, M. (2015). Survey of historic sites at and near Aventura. In C. Robin (Ed.), Aventura archaeology project: 2015 season (pp. 73–91). Belmopan: Institute of Archaeology.Google Scholar
  24. Maler, T. (1911). Explorations in the Department of Petén, Guatemala, Tikal. Cambridge, MA: Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology.Google Scholar
  25. Malkki, L. (1990). Context and consciousness: Local conditions for the production of historical and national thought among Hutu refugees in Tanzania. In R. Fox (Ed.), Nationalist ideologies and the production of natural of cultures (pp. 32–62). Washington, DC: American Ethnological Society.Google Scholar
  26. Malkki, L. (1995). Refugees and exile, from “refugee studies” to the national order of things. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 495–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maudslay, A. (1889–1902). Archaeology. In F. D. Godman & O. Salvin (Eds.), Biologia Centrali-Americana (Vol. 3). London: R.H. Porter.Google Scholar
  28. Mayfield, T. (2015). The nineteenth-century British plantation settlement at Lamanai, Belize (1837–1868) Doctoral Dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
  29. Moholy-Nagy, H. (2012). Historical archaeology at Tikal, Guatemala. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ng, O. (2007). View from the periphery: A hermeneutic approach to the archaeology of Holotunich (1865–1930), British Honduras. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  31. Palka, J. (2005). Unconquered Lacandon Maya. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
  32. Pendergast, D. (1967). Palenque; The Walker-Cady expedition to the ancient Maya City (pp. 1839–1840). Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
  33. Reed, N. (1964). The caste war of Yucatan (Rev ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Reina, R. (1958–1961). The abandonment of Primicias by Itza of San Jose, Guatemala, and Socotz, British Honduras. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  35. Reina, R., & Hill, R. (1978). The traditional pottery of Guatemala. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  36. Rickard, J. (2006). Mocha and related dipped wares, 1770–1939. Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
  37. Rugeley, T. (1997). The caste war in Guatemala. Saastun, 3, 67–96.Google Scholar
  38. Rugeley, T. (2009). Rebellion now and forever: Mayas, Hispanics, and caste war violence in Yucatan (pp. 1800–1880). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Samford, P., & Miller, G. (2012). Post-colonial ceramics. Retrieved December 6, 2017, from http://www.jefpat.org/diagnostic/Post-Colonial%20Ceramics/index-PostColonialCeramics.htm
  40. Shook, E. (1958). Field director’s report: The 1956 and 1957 seasons. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  41. Trigger, B. (1989). A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. UNHCR. (2018). UNHCR The UN refugee agency; Figures at a Glance. Retrieved March 29, 2018, from http://www.unhcr.org/en-us/figures-at-a-glance.html
  43. Voss, B. (2008). The archaeology of ethnogenesis: Race and sexuality in colonial San Francisco. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
  44. Wauchope, R. (1938). Modern Maya houses: A study of their archaeological significance. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington.Google Scholar
  45. White, R. (1991). The middle ground: Indians, Empires, and Republics in the Great Lakes Region (pp. 1650–1815). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Williams, P. (1978). Staffordshire romantic transfer patterns. Jeffersontown, KY: Fountain House East.Google Scholar
  47. Yeager, J., Church, M., Dornan, J., & Leventhal, R. (2002). San Pedro Maya report: Preliminary report of the 2001 field season. Belmopan: Institute of Archaeology.Google Scholar
  48. Yeager, J., Church, M., Leventhal, R., & Dornan, J. (2004). Maya caste war immigrants in colonial British Honduras: The San Pedro Maya project, 2000–2003. Research Reports in Belizean Archaeology, 1, 101–112.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Meierhoff
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations