Advertisement

Performativity, Creativity and Personalised Learning

  • Dennis Beach
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter has been developed from some recent research viewed in relation to an article by Beach and Dovemark entitled Making “right” choices: an ethnographic account of creativity, performativity and personalised learning policy, concepts and practices. This article was first published in the Oxford Review of Education in July 2009. It uses data from ethnographic investigations in two Year 8 classes in two middle-sized secondary schools about a kilometre apart in a Swedish town in the western part of the country. One school stands in a predominantly middle-class area of privately owned ‘low-rise’ houses whilst the other is in an area of ‘high-rise’ rented accommodation, where the first language of many homes is not Swedish. The differences between the two catchment areas are important. The school in the low-rise community has become a magnet school for high-achievers and the children of white and wealthier parents. The school in the second area belongs to a stigmatized peri-urban space that has suffered in recent years from multi-level poverty. Situated in the national education political context following the stabilisation of general trends of decentralisation and privatisation in the governance and control of educational processes and outcomes in Sweden subsequent to the Swedish education decentralisation and privatisation acts in the late 1980s and early 1990s, it examines how pupils experience their education in school and how they and their performances are assessed and valued by teachers.

References

  1. Agier, M. (2009). The Ghetto, the Hyperghetto and the Fragmentation of the World. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(3), 854–857. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00922.x/full.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anyon, J. (1981). Social Class and School Knowledge. Curriculum Inquiry, 11(1), 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ball, S. J. (2003). The Teachers’ Soul and the Terrors of Performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18, 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ball, S. J. (2007). Education Plc: Understanding Private Sector Participation in the Public Sector. Oxford: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ball, S. J. (2008). New Philanthropy, New Networks and New Governance in Education. Political Studies, 56, 747–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bauman, Z. (1999). Arbete, Konsumtion och den nya fattigdomen. Göteborg: Didalos.Google Scholar
  7. Beach, D. (1999a). Alienation and Fetish in Science Education. Scandinavian Journal of Education Research, 43(2), 157–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beach, D. (1999b). Matematikens politik och ideologi. Nämnaren, 26, 56–60.Google Scholar
  9. Beach, D. (1999c). Om demokrati, reproduktion och förnyelse i dagens gymnasieskola. Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige, 4(4), 349–365.Google Scholar
  10. Beach, D. (2001). Alienation, Reproduction and Fetish in Swedish Education. In G. Walford (Ed.), Ethnography and Education Policy, Studies in Education Ethnography (Vol. 4, pp. 193–220). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beach, D. (2003). Mathematics Goes to Market. In D. Beach, T. Gordon, & E. Lahelma (Eds.), Democratic Education—Ethnographic Challenges. London: Tufnell Press.Google Scholar
  12. Beach, D. (2008). The Paradoxes of Student Learning Preferences. Ethnography and Education, 3(2), 145–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Beach, D. (2010). Socialisation and Commercialisation in the Restructuring of Education and Health Professions in Europe: Questions of Global Class and Gender. Current Sociology, 58(4), 551–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Beach, D., & Dovemark, M. (2007). Education and the Commodity Problem: Ethnographic Investigations of Creativity and Performativity in Swedish Schools. London: Tufnell Press.Google Scholar
  15. Beach, D., & Dovemark, M. (2009). Making Right Choices: An Ethnographic Investigation of Creativity and Performativity in Four Swedish Schools. Oxford Review of Education, 35(6), 689–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Beach, D., & Dovemark, M. (2011). Twelve Years of Upper-Secondary Education in Sweden: The Beginnings of a Neo-liberal Policy Hegemony. Educational Review, 63(3), 313–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Beach, D., & Puaca, G. (2014). Changing Higher Education by Reform: Education Choices and Student Identities. European Journal of Higher Education, 4(1), 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Beach, D., & Sernhede, S. (2011). From Learning to Labour to Learning for Marginality: School Segregation and Marginalisation in Swedish Suburbs. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 32(2), 257–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Sage: London.Google Scholar
  20. Bernstein, B. (1990). Class, Codes and Control, Vol. 4: The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bernstein, B. (2003). Social Class and Pedagogical Practice. In B. Bernstein (Ed.), Class, Codes and Control, Vol. 4: The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Bhaktin, M. (1941). Rabelais and His World. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Bhatti, G. (2011). Outsiders or Insiders? Identity, Educational Success and Muslim Young Men in England. Ethnography and Education, 6(1), 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Bouakaz, L. (2007). Parental Involvement in School: What Promotes and What Hinders Parental Involvement in an Urban School (Doctoral Thesis). Malmö: Malmö University Electronic Publishing. http://muep.mau.se/handle/2043/4684
  25. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1970/1977). Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Broady, D., & Börjesson, M. (2005). Gymnasiaskolans sociala karta [The Social Map of Upper-Secondary Schools]. Utbildningsvetenskap 2005—Resultat dialog (Stockholm, Vetenskapsrådets rapportserie 13).Google Scholar
  27. Cole, M. (2003). Might it be in the Practice that It Fails to Succeed? A Marxist Critique of Claims for Postmodernism and Poststructuralism as Forces for Social Change and Social Justice. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 24(4), 487–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. David, M. E. (1980). The State, The Family and Education. Henley on Thames: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  29. Dewey, S. (2000). Imperial Designs, Post-Colonial Replications: Class and Power at Cathedral and John Connon School in Bombay. Ethnography and Education, 1(2), 215–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dewey, S. (2006). Imperial Designs, Post-Colonial Replications: Class and Power at Cathedral and John Connon School in Bombay. Ethnography and Education, 1(2), 215–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dovemark, M. (2004). Ansvar-flexibilitet-valfrihet. En etnografisk studie (Gothenburg Studies in Educational Sciences 223). Göteborg: ACTA Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
  32. Erlandson, P. (2007). Docile Bodies and Imaginary Minds: On Schön’s Reflection in Action (Gothenburg Studies in Educational Sciences 257). Göteborg: ACTA.Google Scholar
  33. Erlandson, P., & Beach, D. (2014). Ironising with Intelligence. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 35(4), 598–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Francis, D. (2017). Troubling the Teaching and Learning of Gender and Sexuality Diversity in South African Education. Journal of LGBT Youth, 14(4), 359–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Giddens, A. (2002). Runaway World: How Globalisation is Reshaping Our Lives. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  36. Gilbertson, A. (2014). ‘Mugging Up’ Versus ‘Exposure’: International Schools and Social Mobility in Hyderabad, India. Ethnography and Education, 9(2), 210–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Harvey, D. (2003). The New Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Harvey, D. (2006). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Hultén, M., & Lundahl, C. (2018). Betyg och bedömning i en marknadsutsatt skola. In A. Fejes & M. Dahlstedt (Eds.), Skolan, Marknaden och framtiden. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  40. Johnson, E. (2009). Schooling as a Regime of Equality and Reproducing Difference in an Afro-Ecuadorian Region. Ethnography and Education, 4(2), 147–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kenway, J., Fahey, J., Epstein, D., Koh, A., McCarthy, C., & Rizvi, F. (2018). Multi-sited Global Ethnography and Elite Schools: A Methodological Entrée. In D. Beach, C. Bagley, & S. Marques da Silva (Eds.), The Handbook of Ethnography of Education. London/New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  42. Koh, A., & Kenway, J. (2016). Introduction: Reading the Dynamics of Educational Privilege Through a Spatial Lens. In A. Koh & J. Kenway (Eds.), Elite Schooling: Multiple Geographies of Privilege. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Lacey, C. (1970). Hightown Grammar: The School as a Social. System. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Lindblad, S., Lundahl, L., Lindgren, J., & Zackari, G. (2002). Educating for the New Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 46, 283–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lpf 94. (1994). National Curriculum for the Upper-Secondary and Voluntary School Sector.Google Scholar
  46. Lpfö 98. (1998). National Curriculum for the Pre-School and Pre-School Preparation Class.Google Scholar
  47. Lpo 94. (1994). National Curriculum for the Compulsory Comprehensive School.Google Scholar
  48. Lundahl, L. (2002). Sweden: Decentralization, Deregulation, Quasi-Markets – and then What? Journal of Education Policy, 17(6), 687–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lundahl, L., Erixon Arreman, I., Holm, A., & Lundström, U. (2013). Educational Marketization the Swedish Way. Education Inquiry, 4(3), 497–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lundahl, L., Erixon Arreman, I., Holm, A.-S., & Lundström, U. (2014). Gymnasiet som marknad. Umeå: Boréa.Google Scholar
  51. Lundberg, O. (2015). On Cultural Racism and School Learning: An Ethnographic Study (Göteborg Studies in Educational Science). Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothenburgensis.Google Scholar
  52. Mac An Ghaill, M. (1988). Young, Gifted, and Black: Student-Teacher Relations in the Schooling of Black Youth. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Mac An Ghaill, M. (1994). The Making of Men: Masculinities, Sexualities and Schooling. London: McGraw-Hill Education UK.Google Scholar
  54. Maisuria, A. (2016). Obscured Inequality and Feasible Equity: An Exploratory Study of Life History, Consciousness and Practices of Social Class in Contemporary Sweden (Unpublished PhD Thesis). University College London, Institute of Education.Google Scholar
  55. Maisuria, A. (2017) Class Struggle in Cultural Formation in Contemporary Times: A Focus on the Theoretical Importance of Antonio Gramsci and the Organic Intellectualism of Russell Brand and Pablo Iglesias. In McLaren, L & Monzo, L. (Eds.), Revolution and Education Special Issue Knowledge Cultures Journal, Addleton Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  56. Marcuse, H. (1964). One-Dimensional Man. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  57. Nylund, M. (2012). The Relevance of Class in Education Policy and Research: The Case of Sweden’s Vocational Education. Education Inquiry, 3(4), 591–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nylund, M. (2013). Vocational Education, Class and Knowledge (Acdemic Thesis). Örebro: Örebro University (see also for ch. 2).Google Scholar
  59. Rasmussen, A. (2012). The Use of Talent Classes to Reproduce Differentiated Education. Ethnography and Education, 7(1), 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schwartz, A. (2013). Pedagogik, plats och prestationer: en etnografisk studie om en skola i förorten (Gothenburg studies in educational sciences; 340). Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
  61. Seltzer, K., & Bentley, T. (1999). The Creative Age. London: Demos.Google Scholar
  62. Sharp, R., & Green, A. (1975). Education and Social Control: A Study in Progressive Primary Education. London: RKP.Google Scholar
  63. Statens Offentliga Utredningar (SOU). (1991/92:95). Om valfrihet och fristående skolor. Stockholm: Fritzes.Google Scholar
  64. Statens Offentliga Utredningar (SOU). (1992/93:230). Valfrihet i skolan. Stockholm: FritzesGoogle Scholar
  65. Svensson, A. (2001). Består social snedrekrytering? Elevens val av gymnasieprogram hösten 1998. Pedagogisk Forskning i Sverige, 6, 161–182.Google Scholar
  66. Svensson, A. (2006). Hur skall rekryteringen till högskolans mest eftersökta utbildningar breddas? Pedagogisk Forskning i Sverige, 11, 116–133.Google Scholar
  67. Tickle, L. (1983). One Spell of Ten Minutes or Five Spells of Two? Teacher-Pupil Encounters in Art and Design. In A. Hargreaves & P. Woods (Eds.), Classrooms and Staffrooms – The Sociology of Teachers and Teaching (pp. 130–146). London: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Troman, G., Jeffrey, B., & Raggl, A. (2007). Creativity and Performativity Policies in Primary School Cultures. Journal of Education Policy, 22, 549–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Trondman, M., Taha, R., & Lund, A. (2012). For Aïsha: On Identity as Potentiality. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 19, 533–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vigo Arrazola, B., & Soriano Bozalongo, J. (2014). Teaching Practices and Teachers’ Perceptions of Group Creative Practices in Inclusive Rural Schools. Ethnography and Education, 9(2), 253–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Weis, L., Cippollone, K., & Jenkins, H. (2014). Class Warfare: Class, Race and College Admissions in Top Tier Secondary Schools. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Willis, P. (1977). Learning to Labour: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs. Farnborough: Saxon House.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dennis Beach
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Education and Special EducationUniversity of GothenburgGöteborgSweden

Personalised recommendations