Advertisement

Research in Public Policies for Aging

  • Elizabeth Caro-López
  • Ernesto Velasco-Sánchez
Chapter

Abstract

Evidence-based decision-making is an imperative for conducting effective policies, particularly in the case of aging. Systematic research can contribute to better decision making by clarifying concepts, allowing us to place an issue into a larger theoretical framework and by providing evidence on what works. It can help to assess the efficacy, efficiency and legitimacy of different policy alternatives. Finally, it can inform of the potential problems that could be faced and present evidence of the effectiveness of the adopted policies. This chapter offers a brief review of the contributions that researchers can make at different stages in the policy cycle.

Keywords

Public policy Evidence-based policies 

References

  1. 1.
    Aguilar LF (1991) El estudio de las políticas públicas. Ed. Miguel Ángel Porrúa, MéxicoGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ripley RB (1985) Stages of the policy process. In: Daniel CM (ed) Public policy theories, models, and concepts: an anthology. Ed. Upper Saddle River, Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    World Assembly on Aging (1983) A neglected área in the field of population and human rights: ageing and the aged. United Nations, New York, pp 102–109Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Immergut E (1998) The rules of the game. The logic of policy-making in France, Switzerland, and Sweden. In: Steinmo S, Thelen K, Longstreth F (eds) Structuring politics. Historical institutionalism in comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Miller ER, Pastor-Barriuso R, Dalal D, Riemersma RA, Appel LJ, Guallar E (2005) Meta-analysis: high-dosage vitamin E supplementation may increase all-cause mortality. Ann Intern Med 142(1):37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lipsky M (2010) Street-level bureaucracy, 30th ann. Ed.: dilemmas of the individual in public service. Russell Sage Foundation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cornia GA, Stewart F (1995) Two errors targeting. In: van de Walle D, Nead K (eds) Public spending and the poor. Theory and evidence. The World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Osuna JL, Marquez C (2000) Guía para la evaluación de políticas públcas. Universidad de Sevilla, SevillaGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lasswell HD (1970) The emerging conception of the policy sciences. Policy Sci 1(1):3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Caplan NA (1979) The two-communities theory and knowledge utilization. Am Behav Sci 22:459–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Newman J (2014) Revisiting the ‘two-communities’ metaphor of research utilization. Int J Public Sect Manage 27:614–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Leviton LC, Hughes EFX (1981) Research on the utilization of evaluations. A review and synthesis. Eval Rev 5(4):525–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Landry R, Amara N, Lamaru M (2001) Climbing the ladder of research utilization: evidence from social science research. Sci Commun 22:396–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mulgan G, Puttick R (2003) The case for new institutions. Nesta, UKGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth Caro-López
    • 1
  • Ernesto Velasco-Sánchez
    • 2
  1. 1.National Institute of GeriatricsMexico CityMexico
  2. 2.CIVICUS ConsultantsCoyoacán/Mexico CityMexico

Personalised recommendations