Advertisement

Homodimer Folding and Binding

  • Pandjassarame Kangueane
Chapter

Abstract

The formation of an interface through the association of two identical monomers (homodimers) is common in cellular regulation. A number of structures have been known till date in homodimer complex form. The folding mechanism is also known for some of these homodimers. They fold through two-state (2S) without the formation of an intermediate or through three-state (3S) with the formation of an intermediate. The 3S proteins either form a monomer intermediate (3SMI) or a dimer intermediate (3SDI) in establishing a biologically active interface. Therefore, it is of interest to create relationship between structural features and folding mechanism. Estimating the relationship between known homodimer structures with known folding data is challenging. The structural differences among 2S, 3SMI, and 3SDI are discussed using 3D homodimer structures.

Keywords

Homodimers Folding mechanism Two-state Three-state Structures Interface area Monomer length 

References

  1. Apiyo D, Jones K, Gulrdy J et al (2001) Equilibrium unfolding of dimeric desulfoferridoxin involves a monomeric intermediate: iron cofactors dissociate after polypeptide unfolding. Biochemistry 40:4940–4948CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Karthikraja V, Suresh A, Lulu S, Kangueane U, Kangueane P (2009) Types of interfaces for homodimer folding and binding. Bioinformation 4:101–111CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Levy Y, Wolynes PG, Onuchic JN (2004) Protein topology determines binding mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:511–516CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Li L, Gunasekaran K, Gan JG et al (2005) Structural features differentiate the mechanisms between 2S and 3S folding of homodimers. Bioinformation 1:42–49CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Mazzini A, Maia A, Parisi M et al (2002) Reversible unfolding of bovine odorant binding protein induced by guanidinium hydrochloride at neutral pH. Biochim Biophys Acta 1599:90–101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Mei G, Divenere A, Rosata A et al (2005) Importance of being dimeric. FEBS J 272:16–27CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Neet KE, Timm DE (1994) Conformational stability of dimeric proteins: quantitative studies by equilibrium denaturation. Protein Sci 3:2167–2174CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Schülke N, Varlamova OA, Donovan GP et al (2003) Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ECTO homodimer is a known target for prostate cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:12590–12595CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Tanaka T, Suh KS, Lo AM et al (2007) p21WAF1/CIP1 is a common transcriptional target of retinoid receptors: pleiotropic regulatory mechanism through retinoic acid receptor (RAR)/retinoid X receptor (RXR) hetrodimer and RXR/RXR homodimer. J Biol Chem 282:29987–29997CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Tiana G, Broglia RA (2002) Design and folding of dimeric protein. Proteins 49:82–94CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Tsai CJ, Xu D, Nussinov R (1997) Structural motifs at protein-protein interfaces: protein cores versus 2S and 3S model complexes. Protein Sci 6:1793–1805CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pandjassarame Kangueane
    • 1
  1. 1.PondicherryIndia

Personalised recommendations