Advertisement

Augmented Reality to Understand the Leonardo’s Machines

Conference paper
First Online:
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10851)

Abstract

Augmented reality plays an important role in cultural heritage and education. The magic effect of 3D animated objects can enhance students’ interest, attention and engagement in school subjects. Moreover, augmented reality can help understand spatial concepts and the working principles of complex mechanical components. In such context, machines designed by Leonardo Da Vinci are a perfect case study for augmented reality technologies. This paper presents a mobile augmented reality application developed for an exhibit on Leonardo’s inventions: it shows the overall structure and the working principles of some machines recognized on the pages of the Atlantic Codex. We used Blender to design the animated 3D models of the machines and the ARToolkit and Vuforia frameworks to superimpose virtual models over Leonardo’s sketches framed by the camera of mobile devices. Subjective data about user experience collected through some questionnaires proved how AR applications can improve the dominant learning style in accordance with Kolb’s theory.

Keywords

Mobile augmented reality E-Culture Cultural heritage Education 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Balaji, B.S., Sekhar, A.C.: The various facets of MOOC. In: IEEE International Conference in MOOC, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE), pp. 139–142 (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tommasi, F., Melle, C., De Luca, V.: OpenSatRelaying: a hybrid approach to real-time audio-video distribution over the internet. J. Commun. 9(3), 248–261 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tommasi, F., De Luca, V., Melle, C.: Are P2P streaming systems ready for interactive e-learning? In: International Conference on Education Technologies and Computers (ICETC), pp. 49–54 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Mora, C., Añorbe-Díaz, B., González-Marrero, A.: Virtual technologies trends in education. Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ. 13(2), 469–486 (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Iqbal, J., Sidhu, M.S.: A review on making things see: augmented reality for futuristic virtual educator. Cogent Educ. 4(1), 632–645 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Koutromanos, G., Sofos, A., Avraamidou, L.: The use of augmented reality games in education: a review of the literature. Educ. Media Int. 52(4), 253–271 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lin, A.C., Fernandez, W.D., Gregor, S.: Understanding web enjoyment experiences and informal learning: a study in a museum context. Decis. Support Syst. 53(4), 846–858 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marsick, V.J., Watkins, K.E.: Informal and incidental learning. New Dir. Adult Contin. Educ. 89, 25–34 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    De Paolis, L.T.: Walking in a virtual town to understand and learning about the life in the middle ages. In: Murgante, B., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2013. LNCS, vol. 7971, pp. 632–645. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39637-3_50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    De Paolis, L.T., Aloisio, G., Celentano, M.G., Oliva, L., Vecchio, P.: A Game-based 3D simulation of otranto in the middle ages. In: Third International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, pp. 130–133 (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    De Paolis, L.T., Aloisio, G., Celentano, M.G., Oliva, L., Vecchio, P.: Experiencing a town of the middle ages: an application for the edutainment in cultural heritage. In: IEEE 3rd International Conference on Communication Software and Networks, pp. 169–174 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    De Paolis, L.T., Aloisio, G., Celentano, M.G., Oliva, L., Vecchio, P.: MediaEvo project: a serious game for the edutainment. In: 3rd International Conference on Computer Research and Development, vol. 4, pp. 524–529 (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Petrucco, C., Agostini, D.: Teaching our cultural heritage using mobile augmented reality. J. E-Learn. Knowl. Soc. 12(3), 115–128 (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chauhan, J., Taneja, S., Goel, A.: Enhancing MOOC with augmented reality, adaptive learning and gamification. In: IEEE 3rd International Conference on MOOCs, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE), pp. 348–353 (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Banu, S.M.: Augmented reality system based on sketches for geometry education. In: International Conference on E-Learning and E-Technologies in Education (ICEEE), pp. 166–170 (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Contero, M., Gomis, J.M., Naya, F., Albert, F., Martin-Gutierrez, J.: Development of an augmented reality based remedial course to improve the spatial ability of engineering students. In: Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings, pp. 1–5 (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Álvarez, A., Javier, F., Parra, B., Beatriz, E., Tubio, M., de Paula, F.: From 2D to 3D: teaching terrain representation in engineering studies through augmented reality: comparative versus 3D pdf. In: IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings, pp. 1–4 (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Botrugno, M.C., D’Errico, G., De Paolis, L.T.: Augmented reality and UAVs in archaeology: development of a location-based AR application. In: De Paolis, L.T., Bourdot, P., Mongelli, A. (eds.) AVR 2017. LNCS, vol. 10325, pp. 261–270. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60928-7_23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vecchio, P., et al.: Cloud computing and augmented reality for cultural heritage. In: De Paolis, L.T., Mongelli, A. (eds.) AVR 2015. LNCS, vol. 9254, pp. 51–60. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22888-4_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    da Vinci, L., Marinoni, A.: Il Codice Atlantico della Biblioteca Ambrosiana di Milano. No. v. 1–4 in Grandi opere in facsimile, Giunti (2000)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zendjebil, I.M., Ababsa, F., Didier, J.Y., Vairon, J., Frauciel, L., Hachet, M.A., Guitton, P., Delmont, R.: Outdoor Augmented Reality: State of the Art and Issues (2009)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Blanco-Novoa, Ó., Fernández-Caramés, T.M., Fraga-Lamas, P., Vilar-Montesinos, M.A.: A practical evaluation of commercial industrial augmented reality systems in an Industry 4.0 Shipyard. IEEE. Access 6, 8201–8218 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Herpich, F., Guarese, R.L.M., Tarouco, L.M.R.: A comparative analysis of augmented reality frameworks aimed at the development of educational applications. Creat. Educ. 8(9), 1433–1451 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
  26. 26.
  27. 27.
    Santos, A.B.D., Dourado, J.B., Bezerra, A.: ARToolkit and qualcomm vuforia: an analytical collation. In: XVIII Symposium on Virtual and Augmented Reality (SVR), pp. 229–233 (2016)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
  29. 29.
  30. 30.
  31. 31.
  32. 32.
    OpenSceneGraph 3D graphics toolkit. http://www.openscenegraph.org
  33. 33.
  34. 34.
  35. 35.
  36. 36.
    Grahn, I.: The Vuforia SDK and Unity3D Game Engine: Evaluating Performance on Android Devices (2017)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kolb, D.A.: Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice-Hall P T R, Englewood Cliffs (1984)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kolb, D., Rubin, I., McIntyre, J.: Organizational Psychology: Readings on Human Behavior in Organizations. Behavioral Science in Business Series. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1984)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Engineering for InnovationUniversity of SalentoLecceItaly

Personalised recommendations