Advertisement

ARtour: Augmented Reality-Based Game to Promote Agritourism

  • Juan Garzón
  • Juan Acevedo
  • Juan Pavón
  • Silvia Baldiris
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10850)

Abstract

Agritourism is an extension of ecotourism, which encourages visitors to experience agricultural life at firsthand. The growing interest in this industry worldwide poses new challenges to the environment. Traditional tourism models have somehow endangered local biodiversity and, consequently, it is necessary to promote new models that include education. Eco-education is commonly conducted through passive learning approaches within educational institutions, which often result in poor student performance in real life. Therefore, it is necessary to generate active methodologies to enrich learning experiences. Augmented Reality holds the power to add multiple benefits to the learning processes. Accordingly, this study introduces “ARtour”. ARtour combines an Augmented Reality experience with on-site experiences to learn about agritourism while encourages tourists to maintain responsible environmental behavior. The project considers two outdoor learning scenarios: aquaponics and subsistence crops. We posit that ARtour will enhance outdoor learning experiences and will be a useful guide to promote agritourism.

Keywords

Agritourism Augmented reality Eco-education Ecotourism 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors are deeply grateful to Catholic University of the East - Colombia, for having fully supported this project.

References

  1. 1.
    McGehee, N.G., Kim, K., Jennings, G.R.: Motivation for agri-tourism entrepreneurship. Tour. Manag. 28(1), 280–289 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Weaver, D.B., Fennell, D.: The vacation farm sector in Saskatchewan: a profile of operations. Tour. Manag. 18, 357–365 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Melstrom, R.T., Murphy, C.: Do agritourism visitors care about landscapes? An examination with producer-level data. J. Travel Res. 57(3), 360–369 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Govindasamy, R., Vellangany, I., Arumugam, S.: Bed and breakfast: an analysis of consumer preferences for eco-agritourism. J. Food Distrib. Res. 45(1), 69–70 (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abelló, F.J., Palma, M.A., Waller, M.L., Anderson, D.P.: Evaluating the factors influencing the number of visits to farmers’ markets. J. Food Prod. Mark. 20(1), 17–35 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Trends, C., Zurbriggen, M., Nitzsche, P., Vanvranken, R.: Farmers Markets (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Holden, A.: Environment and Tourism. Routledge (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mowforth, M., Munt, I.: Tourism and Sustainability: Development, Globalisation and New Tourism in the Third World. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Paramati, S.R., Shahbaz, M., Alam, M.S.: Does tourism degrade environmental quality? A comparative study of Eastern and Western European Union. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 50, 1–13 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wearing, S., Tarrant, M.A., Schweinsberg, S., Lyons, K.: Cultural and environmental awareness through sustainable tourism education: exploring the role of onsite community tourism-based work-integrated learning projects. In: Handbook of Teaching and Learning in Tourism, Chap. 27, p. 402 (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reis, G., Roth, W.M.: A feeling for the environment: Emotion talk in/for the pedagogy of public environmental education. J. Environ. Educ. 41(2), 71–87 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Huang, T.C., Chen, C.C., Chou, Y.W.: Animating eco-education: to see, feel, and discover in an augmented reality-based experiential learning environment. Comput. Educ. 96, 72–82 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pekrun, R.: Emotions and learning. Int. Acad. Educ. Bur. Educ. IEA (http://www.iaoed.org), IBE (http://www.ibe.unesco.org/publications.htm) (2014)
  14. 14.
    Villarroel, J.D., Antón, Á., Zuazagoitia, D., Nuño, T.: Young children’s environmental judgement and its relationship with their understanding of the concept of living things. Environ. Socio Econ. Stud. 5(1), 1–10 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Torkar, G.: Learning experiences that produce environmentally active and informed minds. NJAS - Wageningen J. Life Sci. 69, 49–55 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Martin, S., Diaz, G., Sancristobal, E., Gil, R., Castro, M., Peire, J.: New technology trends in education: Seven years of forecasts and convergence. Comput. Educ. 57(3), 1893–1906 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Billinghurst, M., Clark, A., Lee, G.: A survey of augmented reality. Found. Trends Hum. Comput. Interact. 8(2–3), 73–272 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yuen, S.C., Yaoyuneyong, G., Johnson, E.: Augmented reality: an overview and five directions for AR in education. J. Educ. Technol. Dev. Exch. 4(1), 119–140 (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Diegmann, P., Schmidt-kraepelin, M., Van Den Eynden, S., Basten, D.: Benefits of augmented reality in educational environments – a systematic literature review. Wirtschaftsinformatik 3(6), 1542–1556 (2015)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bacca, J., Fabregat, R., Baldiris, S., Graf, S., Kinshuk: Augmented reality trends in education: a systematic review of research and applications. Educ. Technol. Soc. 17, 133–149 (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Garzón, J., Pavón, J., Baldiris, S.: Augmented reality applications for education: five directions for future research. In: De Paolis, L.T., Bourdot, P., Mongelli, A. (eds.) AVR 2017, Part I. LNCS, vol. 10324, pp. 402–414. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60922-5_31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mekni, M., Lemieux, A.: Augmented reality : applications, challenges and future trends. In: Applied Computational Science Anywhere, pp. 205–214 (2014)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Akçayir, M., Akçayir, G.: Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: a systematic review of the literature. Educ. Res. Rev. 20, 1–11 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chen, P., Liu, X., Cheng, W., Huang, R.: A review of using augmented reality in education from 2011 to 2016. In: Popescu, E., et al. (eds.) Innovations in Smart Learning. LNET, pp. 13–18. Springer, Singapore (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2419-1_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Caudell, T.P., Mizell, D.W.: Augmented reality: an application of heads-up display technology to manual manufacturing processes. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 2, pp. 659–669 (1992)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tekedere, H., Göker, H.: Examining the effectiveness of augmented reality applications in education: a meta-analysis. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Educ. 11(16), 9469–9481 (2016)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Keller, J.M.: Motivational Design for Learning and Performance: The ARCS Model Approach. Springer, New York (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1250-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tarng, W., Ou, K.-L., Yu, C.-S., Liou, F.-L., Liou, H.-H.: Development of a virtual butterfly ecological system based on augmented reality and mobile learning technologies. Virtual Real. 19(3–4), 253–266 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kamarainen, A.M., et al.: EcoMOBILE: integrating augmented reality and probeware with environmental education field trips. Comput. Educ. 68, 545–556 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Huang, T.C.: Seeing creativity in an augmented experiential learning environment. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 129, 1–13 (2017)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wharton, C.R.: Towards commercial aquaponics: a review of systems, designs, scales and nomenclature (1969)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wharton, J.: Subsistence Agriculture and Economic Development. Routledge (2017)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    UNESCO, The International Standard Classification of Education (2011)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bacca, J., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R., Kinshuk, Graf, S.: Mobile augmented reality in vocational education and training. Procedia Comput. Sci. 75 (Vare), 49–58 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chen, C.-H., Chou, Y.-Y., Huang, C.-Y.: An augmented-reality-based concept map to support mobile learning for science. Asia-Pacific Educ. Res. 25(4), 567–578 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Di Serio, Á., Ibáñez, M.B., Kloos, C.D.: Impact of an augmented reality system on students’ motivation for a visual art course. Comput. Educ. 68, 585–596 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Joo-Nagata, J., Martinez Abad, F., García-Bermejo Giner, J., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: Augmented reality and pedestrian navigation through its implementation in m-learning and e-learning: evaluation of an educational program in Chile. Comput. Educ. 111, 1–17 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juan Garzón
    • 1
  • Juan Acevedo
    • 1
  • Juan Pavón
    • 2
  • Silvia Baldiris
    • 3
  1. 1.Catholic University of the EastRionegroColombia
  2. 2.Complutense University of MadridMadridSpain
  3. 3.International University of La RiojaLa RiojaSpain

Personalised recommendations